First Great Western Passengers' Forum First Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Plymouth via Okehampton & Tavistock [link]
Current Running Last 2 days Acronyms & Abbreviations Station Comparator First Great Western co. site
October 14, 2008, 03:10:43 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Infrastructure Priorities In The Greater Bristol Area  (Read 396 times)
Lee Fletcher
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4210


View Profile WWW Email
« on: June 29, 2008, 04:29:24 PM »

I'd be interested in reading what posters think are/should be the main priorities for infrastructure (development rather than maintenance/renewal) on the Plymouth-Cornwall routes (including branches) now that Probus-Burngullow has been redoubled and the Penryn loop is due for completion.

Having followed the "Infrastructure Priorities In Cornwall" topic with great interest, I'd like to know what members think are/should be the main priorities for infrastructure in the Greater Bristol area.

I'm currently doing some research on this, and such matters will be raised at the upcoming FOSBR Public Meeting (link below.)
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2718.msg20897#msg20897
Logged

Last call for the Walsall-Wolverhampton service? Please sign this petition
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 796


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2008, 05:47:18 PM »

Obviously Portishead is the big ticket item. One omission that puzzles me is the absence in any plan to reinstate the down relief between Bedminster and Parson St. Moving the up relief diverge to south of Parson St would also help matters.

I presume the Worle to Weston Milton improvement is still happening, although things seem to have gone quiet on that front of late.

And even if complete requadrification of the Filton bank is some way off, I would have thought a northbound "crawler line" up the bank as far as Filton would be very useful.

Oh yes, Parkway fourth platform, which hopefully won't be too far off.
Logged
Graz
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 401


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2008, 06:05:15 PM »

By far, Portishead. I can't think of a cause more worthy than that around Bristol. Trains between Portishead and Bristol Temple Meads perhaps with extensions towards Severn Beach. Sort of like a 'Severn Explorer' service Wink

Reinstatement of passenger trains between St Andrews Road and Bristol Parkway with a new station at Henbury. With the 4th platform soon to open I can't see many problems with capacity at Bristol Parkway, and this would provide many more travel oppertunities with people able to get to the inner Bristol stations from Cardiff and the Midlands. Not to mention Henbury station would provide easy access to Cribb's Causeway.

Turnback proposal at Clifton Down may be interesting and something to look into, though I don't want a resulting cut in Avonmouth/Severn Beach trains due to that. And this sounds a bit silly but I was seriously wondering whether it's an idea to look into upgrading the line between Bath and Bristol , since it is one of the busiest in the region.

Everything John said too  Cheesy
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1106



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2008, 08:53:53 PM »

In addition to the new branch line as above....

Quadruple tracks from Parkway to Temple Meads (with electrification as part of XC route electrification) to provide a high speed entry into Bristol for longer distance passengers, whilst allowing local services to be enhanced with faster (electric), more frequent services - not to mention extra stations.

...Breath...

General line speed increases and reduction in signalling headways where (or if) required.

And electrification of the GWML!
Logged

Shocked OVER 400 SIGNATURES!!! Shocked
Thank you very much for signing "http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Cotswold/" Partial redoubling has been approved! Grin
simonw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 133


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2008, 09:06:19 PM »

The biggest problems in the Greater Bristol area are

Capacity restrictions of the Severn Tunnel
Capacity restrictions between Filton Abbeywood and BTM
Portishead

Is there any chance of connecting Thornbury to the rail network? This could remove a lot of traffic off the A38/M32!
Logged
MikeGTN
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 21


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2008, 07:32:53 AM »

Is there any chance of connecting Thornbury to the rail network? This could remove a lot of traffic off the A38/M32!

The branch from Yate Middle to Tytherinton remains. If the quarry ever closed, there would be a fairly sizeable site for a 'parkway' station there.

I'd like to add the resignalling of the bay platform at WSM for terminating Bristol trains. Would improve reliability and provide better opportunities to recover the service in the event of problems.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of First Great Western, and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk for the official First Great Western website. Please contact the adminstrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants