First Great Western Coffee Shop First Great Western info - [home] and [about]
Plymouth via Okehampton & Tavistock [link]
Current Running Last 2 days Acronyms & Abbreviations Station Comparator First Great Western co. site
September 07, 2008, 04:46:06 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Branch line boost for Truro - Falmouth  (Read 1071 times)
chris from nailsea
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1109



View Profile Email
« on: July 04, 2008, 07:52:04 PM »

Rail services on a cramped Cornish branch line are set to double thanks to a £7.8 million cash injection. The line between Truro and Falmouth will be upgraded with most of the money coming from the EU, Cornwall County Council and Network Rail, which oversees Britain's rail infrastructure.

The scheme will create passing points on the popular commuter and tourist line, which will mean that more than one train can shuttle back and forth at any time.

The Truro to Falmouth route, which is promoted as The Maritime Line by the Devon and Cornwall Rail Partnership, has witnessed an increase in passenger numbers of nearly 70 per cent in ten years. In 1997, an estimated 156,000 journeys were made on the line, while a decade later, the number had mushroomed to 261,000 journeys.

The scheme won backing worth just under £5 million from the EU's Convergence Programme, plus £2.5 million from Cornwall County Council and £600,000 from Network Rail.

Train operator First Great Western also gave its support.

Detailed design work is expected to begin in October with a new timetable commencing next May.

The project will provide a passing loop near Penryn Station and mean a once-an-hour service will double.
It is also planned that passengers using Truro's new park-and-ride, which opens in August, will be able to buy through tickets.

See http://www.thisiscornwall.co.uk/homepagenews/Branch-line-boost-Cornwall/article-206346-detail/article.html

See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cornwall/7489554.stm
Logged
signalandtelegraph
Full Member
***
Posts: 53



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2008, 06:57:16 AM »


The scheme will create passing points on the popular commuter and tourist line, which will mean that more than one train can shuttle back and forth at any time.



Just the one I was aware of at Penrhyn! 

Signalling equipment due to be commissioned first weekend in April

Logged

Bring Back BR
IndustryInsider
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 100


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2008, 01:22:11 PM »

Good stuff - where are they gonna get the stock from though?
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1049



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2008, 03:43:06 PM »

Perhaps they will use LM's 153 (soon to be replaced by a bus) from the Stourbridge branch line?
Logged

Shocked OVER 400 SIGNATURES!!! Shocked
Thank you very much for signing "http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Cotswold/" Partial redoubling has been approved! Grin
Karl Friends of Penmere
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 122


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2008, 08:53:18 PM »

Evening

April is the contractors 'target' to finalise, but
not 100% it may slightly over run that.

When the loop is ready and in action, it will be
booked two c153 single cars, one coming one way and
one the other, this will be refurb stock as per we
have now.  I can see this going down like a lead
baloon with the locals and I have to agree.

Hope this helps!

Regards

Karl.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 729


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2008, 09:51:08 PM »

When the loop is ready and in action, it will be
booked two c153 single cars, one coming one way and
one the other, this will be refurb stock as per we
have now.  I can see this going down like a lead
baloon with the locals and I have to agree.


I'm not sure I understand this view. The service will have the same capacity per hour but instead of 1 2 coach train ph (or less), it'll be more spread with 2 1 coach tph. At the moment there's an arrival into Truro at 0819 which I suspect is heavily loaded with commuters. If there are also arrivals at 0750 and 0850 then the commuter load will be spread over 3 services, hence more capacity.

I know which is the more attractive service for passengers, and it appears a very pragmatic way of doubling frequency without any additional costs in leasing rolling stock. By spreading passenger loads, it should avoid any problems with 1 peak hour train taking all the load, whereas in future the load will be spread over several trains.     
« Last Edit: July 06, 2008, 10:57:30 AM by John R » Logged
Lee Fletcher
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3905


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2008, 10:25:29 AM »

Background quote :

My thanks to Andrew Pennington for the following info on the aspired enhanced frequency and pattern :

Quote from: Andrew Pennington, FGW Head of Train Planning
The core "standard hour" elements are:

1/2 hourly service
 
branch resourced by 2 x 153 vice 1 x 150
 
trains cross with loop provided at Penryn

alternate trains do not call Perranwell due to pathing to make 1/2 hourly core branch service work
Logged
Karl Friends of Penmere
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 122


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2008, 02:45:46 PM »

Afternoon Lee and all

I've seen this statement posted before and I put it
forward to 'someone' who deals alot with the
partnerships TOC's e.t.c and he said that all trains
will stop at Perranwell.  Its only booked a 2min stop,
so I don't think it will throw the timetable out,
although most people I see at meetings usually use the
term a 45min timetable!

If FGW try to alternate the Perranwell stop, I got a
very good idea that "Perranworthal Town Council" plus
Perranwell and surrounding village's will have something
very strong to say about that; like errr no!  And they do
attend partnership meetings frequently!

Regards

Karl.


trains cross with loop provided at Penryn alternate
trains do not call Perranwell due to pathing to make
1/2 hourly core branch service work.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1049



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2008, 05:36:21 PM »

Their are still problems.

People will still use the key peak trains, so overcrowding will get worse. Virgin XC found this out when they did Operation Princess - spreading did not occur.

A more frequent service will result in additional passengers being drawn in (more convenient, reliable etc.), so loadings will increase.

Will a single carriage cope?

Where is the 150 going? And where did the 2*153s come from?
Logged

Shocked OVER 400 SIGNATURES!!! Shocked
Thank you very much for signing "http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Cotswold/" Partial redoubling has been approved! Grin
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1616



View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2008, 05:48:45 PM »

Their are still problems.

People will still use the key peak trains, so overcrowding will get worse. Virgin XC found this out when they did Operation Princess - spreading did not occur.

A more frequent service will result in additional passengers being drawn in (more convenient, reliable etc.), so loadings will increase.

Will a single carriage cope?

Where is the 150 going? And where did the 2*153s come from?

It totally depends at what time the trains arrive and depart from truro.
Logged
Karl Friends of Penmere
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 122


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: July 06, 2008, 06:50:40 PM »

Afternoon

As already said it will be two FGW c153's which there
are enough to choose from!

As regards to overcrowding, I agrued that point at a
previous meeting (especially the 08:00 and 17:00
departures which will have the most), but was told
it will be c153's.  Remember a coment something to
do with funding?  As for 150's they will be deployed
alse where on the FGW network.  As for more, I think
you will have to ask FGW!  Are all the Welsh ones
going back?

Regards

Karl.


Their are still problems.

People will still use the key peak trains, so
overcrowding will get worse. Virgin XC found this
out when they did Operation Princess - spreading
did not occur. A more frequent service will result
in additional passengers being drawn in (more
convenient, reliable etc.), so loadings will increase.

Will a single carriage cope? Where is the 150 going?
And where did the 2*153s come from?
Logged
Karl Friends of Penmere
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 122


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2008, 12:04:58 AM »

Evening

One extra bit of info I forgot to add earlier is
'I think' after 7:00pm, it will revert to one train
and a normal style timetable, whether they will couple
up the other c153 to make a two car formation I don't
know.  Not sure if the first train of the day will be
only one or two?

On my travels bumped into a friend at Dawlish, he
comented on Spotlight Friday.  Funny he said on the
day of filming they used an "Arriva Trains" c150/2
and they filmed a not very attractive Falmouth Town -
The Dell station!

Regards

Karl.
Logged
Lee Fletcher
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3905


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2008, 11:33:57 AM »

Afternoon Lee and all

I've seen this statement posted before and I put it
forward to 'someone' who deals alot with the
partnerships TOC's e.t.c and he said that all trains
will stop at Perranwell.  Its only booked a 2min stop,
so I don't think it will throw the timetable out,
although most people I see at meetings usually use the
term a 45min timetable!

If FGW try to alternate the Perranwell stop, I got a
very good idea that "Perranworthal Town Council" plus
Perranwell and surrounding village's will have something
very strong to say about that; like errr no!  And they do
attend partnership meetings frequently!

Regards

Karl.


trains cross with loop provided at Penryn alternate
trains do not call Perranwell due to pathing to make
1/2 hourly core branch service work.

Update from Andrew Pennington :

Quote from: Andrew Pennington, FGW Head of Train Planning
No change on previous advice with alternate calls

The previous advice was :

Quote from: Andrew Pennington, FGW Head of Train Planning
The core "standard hour" elements are:

1/2 hourly service
 
branch resourced by 2 x 153 vice 1 x 150
 
trains cross with loop provided at Penryn

alternate trains do not call Perranwell due to pathing to make 1/2 hourly core branch service work
Logged
Karl Friends of Penmere
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 122


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: July 07, 2008, 12:43:27 PM »

Morning

Have had a word with another source of mine and
yep Lee is alternate.  My other source (who I will
have a word with his shell when I see him next as
he should know details), has good muddled up
somewhere!  I did ask him about Perranwell in
detail.

Also first train of the day is likely to be one
c153 then from 7am - 7pm will be the two c153's,
then it will revert back to a normal service.
There might be the possibility of later service
as well.

Regards

Karl. 
Logged
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: July 07, 2008, 05:43:39 PM »

Their are still problems.

People will still use the key peak trains, so overcrowding will get worse. Virgin XC found this out when they did Operation Princess - spreading did not occur.

SWT on the other hand with their massive timetable rebuild put the spreading of passengers over services key into the timetable - which did extremely well. It depends how well you advertise it and also, on ticketing! Add benefits for travelling later and earlier (Early Bird come to mind, TPE offer this) then there will be more of an uptake of shoulder peak services.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of First Great Western, and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk for the official First Great Western website. Please contact the adminstrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants