Title: Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers Post by: matth1j on June 13, 2025, 14:16:40 As you might expect, they're going to be using AI.
On the yahoo!tech site (it's a Telegraph article but you need to be a subscriber to read it in full there): https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/articles/tech-arms-race-erupts-bid-075508560.html Title: Re: Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers Post by: Chris from Nailsea on June 13, 2025, 14:43:12 With acknowledgement to the Telegraph as my source, here is that article:
Quote A technological arms race has broken out to combat the fare-dodging crisis plaguing Britain’s railways. Faced with the prospect of £500m in lost ticket sales, rail operators are embracing artificial intelligence (AI) and so-called machine learning to crack down on freeloaders. Evasion tactics that once went little further than hiding in a train lavatory to avoid the guard have changed radically since ticket barriers – first trialled on the Tube in 1964 – were introduced at major stations and across commuter networks. Miscreants are often seen forcing their way through the barriers to avoid paying, a trend recently highlighted by Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, as he issued a call to arms. However, evasion tactics span well beyond brute force. The digitisation of ticketing in particular, with the bulk of payments made by bank card, travel card or mobile phone, has opened up whole new avenues for fare abuse and forced operators to respond with tougher safeguards. Transport for London (TfL), which puts its annual losses from fare-dodging at £130m, says that 4.7pc of Tube passengers – almost one in every 20 – skipped paying or stumped up the incorrect fare in the last financial year alone. Yet, across its wider network of the Tube, Overground, buses, Docklands Light Railway and Elizabeth Line, the rate of offending fell from 3.8pc to 3.4pc after fines were raised to £100. TfL aims to bring it down to 1.5pc by 2030 through an intelligence-led approach combined with new technologies and more proactive enforcement. While offending in London is well short of New York’s 13pc evasion rate, Siwan Hayward, TfL’s director of security, says that fare-dodging “is not a victimless crime”. She says: “It robs Londoners of vital investment in a safe and reliable transport network. The overwhelming majority of customers pay the correct fare, and it’s unfair to those who do that a minority avoid paying.” The main weapon in TfL’s armoury is its Irregular Travel Analysis Platform (ITAP), which uses ticketing and journey data, passenger information and CCTV to identify repeat offenders. The tool is integral for a TfL investigations team that seeks to identify “high-impact offenders”, some of whom cost the network up to thousands of pounds a year in lost revenue. After studying data, the team liaises with 500 uniformed enforcement officers and plain-clothes inspectors, who can demand proof of a ticket or travel card while staging sting operations in stations, sometimes supported by the British Transport Police. This crackdown led to TfL securing fines of £400,000 last year after prosecuting 360 of the most prolific offenders. Among the offences deployed by fare evaders are techniques known as zonal avoidance and re-tokenisation. The former, colloquially dubbed “doughnutting”, involves travel through zones that have not been paid for. In re-tokenisation, or “card tumbling,” the fraudster deletes a virtual card from a digital wallet on a mobile device after a journey to prevent authorisation of the transaction overnight. The card is then reloaded, at which point it is allocated a new tokenised number, preventing it from being blacklisted. A similar con involves the use of a bank card with insufficient funds to pay for a ticket. Tube gates identify the card as genuine and will let the holder in and out, only for the payment to bounce when requested. One offender last year used a contactless card to avoid paying the correct fare on 202 journeys, resulting in £1,427 in fines. Other scams include the abuse of Freedom Passes, which offer free travel in London for the disabled and those aged 66 and over. Meanwhile, outside of the biggest cities, at least 2,000 of Britain’s 2,500 or so stations still lack barriers. Therefore, bosses are required to rely on traditional checks to ensure passengers are paying. Graham Sutherland, chief executive of FirstGroup, which runs express trains on the West Coast and Great Western main lines, said on-train ticket checks remained vital to prevent “revenue leakage”. But there is no doubt that technology has been a game-changer. LNER, which runs trains between London King’s Cross and Edinburgh, has led the way among long-distance operators in deploying AI to uncover unusual ticket-purchase patterns and identify fraudsters, setting up a “machine learning team” to work alongside its risk experts. A pilot project that began in 2023 immediately identified a customer who had failed to pay for £10,000 worth of travel. Using information uncovered by the new technology, the team then built a case, which resulted in the customer repaying the full loss to LNER. Paul Larder, at LNER, said the application of machine learning had been revolutionary. He said: “Previously, we’ve relied on our revenue protection team to identify customers who deliberately purchase incorrect tickets for travelling on our services. By using AI, we can accurately analyse large amounts of information quickly and identify patterns that our team can investigate further.” While companies are ramping up efforts to catch offenders, a report from the Office of Rail and Road this month identified “significant inconsistency” in how operators target fare-dodgers, which has led to unnecessary and unfair prosecutions. Lord Hendy, the rail minister, who put the cost of fare evasion in England outside London at £400m a year, said a planned new ticketing system as part of the nationalisation programme should reduce instances of people mistakenly buying the wrong tickets. However, for the thugs who push through – known as bumpers, jumpers and tailgaters – sturdier barriers are being created. Developed by Cubic Transportation Systems, the barriers stretch from the floor to shoulder height and use AI-aided scanning software to detect instances of fare-dodging. Cubic says the gates “can accurately detect, record and flag fare evasion as it’s happening, distinguishing between different types of fare evasion, such as pushing through and climbing under the paddles or tailgating”. Sir Sadiq Khan’s TfL has not yet said if it will order the equipment. However, if they do, they may finally offer some solace to law-abiding passengers confronted by petty criminals cheating the system while regular staff, who are forbidden from staging physical interventions, look on. CfN. Title: Re: Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers Post by: infoman on June 14, 2025, 03:35:07 from what I recall there are 200 assaults on TfL staff per week and 100 are ticket related issues.
How much is the cost of 100 staff per week being assaulted and having time off work as opposed to the amount of fares being lost. As a by line when using the London Underground,the amount of times I have seen passengers get right behind a fare paying passenger and go through right behind them. Title: Re: Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers Post by: grahame on June 14, 2025, 05:50:35 How much is the cost of 100 staff per week being assaulted and having time off work as opposed to the amount of fares being lost. I'm not sure on the numbers ... but to let people evade fares because of the threat of them assaulting staff members would be a slippery and lawless slope indeed. Not rocket science (and I'm sure it's being done) ... 1. Reduce fare evasion in the first place * Remove loopholes in the system that make it easier to avoid paying the right fare in the first place * Clarify the fare system so that it's very clear indeed what isn't allowed 2. Apprehend those who still and knowingly evade fares in a more secure way Title: Re: Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers Post by: PhilWakely on June 14, 2025, 07:21:04 * Remove loopholes in the system that make it easier to avoid paying the right fare in the first place Split tickets cause all sorts of challenges. They may offer the traveller a cheaper journey, but they cause all sorts of challenges to the operators. I have heard stories of folk purchasing split tickets for their journey; showing the relevant part when asked to show their ticket; and then applying for a refund for the tickets not checked - and openly boasting about it! That is certainly a form of fare evasion. Title: Re: Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers Post by: Bob_Blakey on June 14, 2025, 08:26:10 Quote .....Graham Sutherland, chief executive of FirstGroup, which runs express trains on the West Coast and Great Western main lines, said on-train ticket checks remained vital to prevent “revenue leakage”. ..... As I posted elsewhere on this forum SWTSMBO and I recently travelled from DIG to PAD, via EXD, without having our tickets checked on either train. DIG is ungated and the IET terminated at one of the ungated PAD platforms. Mr. Sutherland appears, as they say, to be having a giraffe! Title: Re: Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers Post by: TaplowGreen on June 14, 2025, 08:50:31 I am struck by watching "Fare Dodgers" that the BTP are often not around when needed to deal with regular/aggressive fare dodgers, tailgaters etc and as they don't have the power to detain them the RP/gateline staff have little option but to let them go despite frequently calling for their assistance.
Perhaps a more visible/rapid reaction presence to make arrests would be more of a deterrent? Otherwise it tends to be the more compliant customers who have often made honest mistakes that tend to get punished. Title: Re: Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers Post by: grahame on June 14, 2025, 09:23:14 * Remove loopholes in the system that make it easier to avoid paying the right fare in the first place Split tickets cause all sorts of challenges. They may offer the traveller a cheaper journey, but they cause all sorts of challenges to the operators. I have heard stories of folk purchasing split tickets for their journey; showing the relevant part when asked to show their ticket; and then applying for a refund for the tickets not checked - and openly boasting about it! That is certainly a form of fare evasion. We had an interesting session yesterday about multi-leg air fares ... with the lady from Ryanair explaining some of the issues as far as attribution of income and responsibility when something goes wrong. Lively. Title: Re: Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers Post by: Mark A on June 14, 2025, 09:52:10 I am struck by watching "Fare Dodgers" that the BTP are often not around when needed to deal with regular/aggressive fare dodgers, tailgaters etc and as they don't have the power to detain them the RP/gateline staff have little option but to let them go despite frequently calling for their assistance. Perhaps a more visible/rapid reaction presence to make arrests would be more of a deterrent? Otherwise it tends to be the more compliant customers who have often made honest mistakes that tend to get punished. This put me in mind of the weird guy begging on the train up from Sutton to London Victoria the other year, going way beyond inappropriate and making every woman on the train feel insecure. Gateline staff unable to do anything other than let him through at which point he worked his way round the concourse and then the Wetherspoons there. Their staff knew him well and put him out. As we had half an hour connection time between trains we attempted to find security staff to help, one attended, interrupted him as he was successfully relieving a couple of encumbered international tourists of some cash, talked with him for some time, then, off he went and five minutes later he was continuing to work passengers on the other side of the station as we left for our connection. Mark This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |