Title: December 2009 Timetable Post by: devon_metro on September 13, 2009, 18:35:23 Can now be found in online journey planners.
It seems a lot of slack has been cut! Swansea - Paddington in 2 hours 56 mins on the 1528 from Swansea for example! 0558 Swansea - Paddington fast from Swindon - Paddington etc. Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Chris from Nailsea on September 13, 2009, 18:54:46 Thanks, devon_metro! ;)
Interestingly, the new timetable is not yet available on the FGW website, at http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/BuyTickets.aspx ::) Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Mookiemoo on September 13, 2009, 19:15:57 No slack removal on the Cotswolds I see.
Only saving grace is that none has been added! Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Btline on September 13, 2009, 19:34:36 It seems a lot of slack has been cut! Swansea - Paddington in 2 hours 56 mins on the 1528 from Swansea for example! :) Good to see. Hopefully FGW will be able to tighten up its operations to prevent delays. Quote 0558 Swansea - Paddington fast from Swindon - Paddington etc. Good a peak service with fewer stops. FGW are learning! ;D ;D Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: paul7575 on September 13, 2009, 21:40:48 XC haven't caught up with the fact that Southampton Tunnel is closed weekends from 5/6 December onwards, which leads to the planners showing the ridiculous situation of changing out of an SWT service at Southampton Parkway and going forward in a XC service... ::)
Paul Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: devon_metro on September 14, 2009, 17:47:19 I've noticed one anomaly. Whilst they seem to be cutting slack in most places, the 0600 Plymouth - Paddington is to be no longer. Soon, it will be 7 minutes slower and call at nowhere additionally. Most odd.
Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Btline on September 14, 2009, 18:35:59 Note that the timetables have yet to be confirmed! TOCs are signing them off later this week, so changes could still happen.
Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: willc on September 14, 2009, 22:45:01 Can now be found in online journey planners. It seems a lot of slack has been cut! Swansea - Paddington in 2 hours 56 mins on the 1528 from Swansea for example! 0558 Swansea - Paddington fast from Swindon - Paddington etc. By "journey planners" do you mean the XC site, because I can't find the December times anywhere else? Forgive me for asking, but in what way is this cutting slack? If you care to consult the current timetable, the first train mentioned now leaves at 15.29 and gets in at 18.24, ie 2 hr 55min, so your cut in slack would be... a one-minute increase in the journey time. And the other one may cut nine minutes, but loses a Reading stop at 8.33 - it might stop a few more commuters cramming on to get to London but is it wise to drop a call there at that time of the morning? I suspect there might be a few people from South Wales doing business in Reading who are less than impressed. And someone else's trains will presumably be making Didcot and Reading calls to maintain the current frequency, so I don't think they will be quite as pleased as some of you seem to be. Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Btline on September 15, 2009, 00:36:39 And the other one may cut nine minutes, but loses a Reading stop at 8.33 - it might stop a few more commuters cramming on to get to London but is it wise to drop a call there at that time of the morning? I suspect there might be a few people from South Wales doing business in Reading who are less than impressed. And someone else's trains will presumably be making Reading calls to maintain the current frequency, so I don't think they will be quite as pleased as some of you seem to be. I also raised an eyebrow at the cut of a Reading stop. Why not make it a set down only stop instead. :-\ Cutting a Swindon (or equivalent) stop would be better. Hmm what else can call additionally at Reading? ;D ??? I hope no Cotswold commuter trains are routes via Didcot! >:( Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Mookiemoo on September 15, 2009, 00:48:16 And the other one may cut nine minutes, but loses a Reading stop at 8.33 - it might stop a few more commuters cramming on to get to London but is it wise to drop a call there at that time of the morning? I suspect there might be a few people from South Wales doing business in Reading who are less than impressed. And someone else's trains will presumably be making Reading calls to maintain the current frequency, so I don't think they will be quite as pleased as some of you seem to be. I also raised an eyebrow at the cut of a Reading stop. Why not make it a set down only stop instead. :-\ Cutting a Swindon (or equivalent) stop would be better. Hmm what else can call additionally at Reading? ;D ??? I hope no Cotswold commuter trains are routes via Didcot! >:( For Gods sake! The Cathedrals used to be none stop - oxf - pad Reading is not a religious moment Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Btline on September 15, 2009, 00:53:02 Reading is a major commuter destination (like yourself once ;) ). It is also the biggest interchange outside London.
However, I still agree with the stop cuts! ;D ;D Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Zoe on September 15, 2009, 08:44:50 It is also the biggest interchange outside London. Have you never heard of Birmingham New Street?Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Mookiemoo on September 15, 2009, 09:25:06 Reading is a major commuter destination (like yourself once ;) ). It is also the biggest interchange outside London. However, I still agree with the stop cuts! ;D ;D Yeah yeah - and I've just done five months in slough and as of 1st october will be doing 14 months in Wokingham so I know all about Reading ..... The point I'm making is not EVERYTHING has to stop there Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: willc on September 15, 2009, 09:52:42 Reading is a major commuter destination (like yourself once ;) ). It is also the biggest interchange outside London. However, I still agree with the stop cuts! ;D ;D Yeah yeah - and I've just done five months in slough and as of 1st october will be doing 14 months in Wokingham so I know all about Reading ..... The point I'm making is not EVERYTHING has to stop there No, but I expect that if a train you needed to catch to get you home skipped a Reading stop, then we would be hearing all about it. And I can still remember, so insane was it, what was involved getting from Reading to Moreton-in-Marsh one time in the late 1990s when the evening train skipped Reading - either set out much earlier on an all-stations stopper to Oxford, or catch a Bristol service to Didcot, then get off and await the arrival of an Oxford-bound HST which called at Didcot and Oxford only, then change again at Oxford. Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Mookiemoo on September 15, 2009, 11:43:52 Reading is a major commuter destination (like yourself once ;) ). It is also the biggest interchange outside London. However, I still agree with the stop cuts! ;D ;D Yeah yeah - and I've just done five months in slough and as of 1st october will be doing 14 months in Wokingham so I know all about Reading ..... The point I'm making is not EVERYTHING has to stop there No, but I expect that if a train you needed to catch to get you home skipped a Reading stop, then we would be hearing all about it. And I can still remember, so insane was it, what was involved getting from Reading to Moreton-in-Marsh one time in the late 1990s when the evening train skipped Reading - either set out much earlier on an all-stations stopper to Oxford, or catch a Bristol service to Didcot, then get off and await the arrival of an Oxford-bound HST which called at Didcot and Oxford only, then change again at Oxford. Not if it were in the timetable Just as I put with, at the ideal times I needed to travel, there were more Maidenhead fast to Paddington with no slough stop than there were slough fast! Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Tim on September 15, 2009, 13:51:17 No slack removal on the Cotswolds I see. probably prudent to see if the new track actually works before cutting the slack Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Btline on September 15, 2009, 16:44:44 Have you never heard of Birmingham New Street? Yes. Your point is? ;) Birmingham is over 100 miles from London. Hardly just outside! Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Zoe on September 15, 2009, 18:21:18 It is also the biggest interchange outside London. Birmingham is over 100 miles from London. Hardly just outside! You didn't say "just" outside in the original post. Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: TerminalJunkie on September 15, 2009, 18:45:46 You didn't say "just" outside in the original post. He probably didn't read it... Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Btline on September 15, 2009, 18:57:00 Yes, I can see the confusion. ::) When I said outside, I meant neighbouring, apologies. :-\ :-X :-[
Nevertheless, Reading is still one of the biggest interchanges wherever! And is TJ accusing me of not doing some Reading? ;D Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Phil on September 15, 2009, 23:08:51 Doesn't Clapham Junction have some sort of claim to this as well?
Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Btline on September 15, 2009, 23:12:44 Doesn't Clapham Junction have some sort of claim to this as well? Clapham Junction is Europe's (if not the world's minus Tokyo!) busiest station. But it doesn't counts as it is in London! ;) Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: broadgage on September 21, 2009, 08:34:37 Does anyone know when the new timetable will be confirmed and placed on the FGW website ?
Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: paul7575 on September 21, 2009, 12:38:37 The finalised timetable info should be in all the journey planners as of today, as the decision making process has a 12 week deadline. However previous experience suggests the TOC's online pdf timetables do not go live, and printed timetables do not appear in the racks, until about 3-4 weeks before the change date...
FGW are running with about a 13 week online availability, ie up to Sun 20th Dec, National Rail and SWT only go up to Sun 13th December, which is the actual change day. I think they'll then provide an extra day's info every 24 hours... Paul Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Tim on September 21, 2009, 13:28:33 Doesn't Clapham Junction have some sort of claim to this as well? Clapham Junction is Europe's (if not the world's minus Tokyo!) busiest station. But it doesn't counts as it is in London! ;) In terms of number of trains per day, not number of passengers. Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Btline on September 21, 2009, 16:03:20 No, Waterloo is Britain's busiest station by passenger numbers. Not sure what the world's busiest is...
Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: grahame on September 21, 2009, 16:14:25 No, Waterloo is Britain's busiest station by passenger numbers. Not sure what the world's busiest is... It so depends on how you measure it! The passenger numbers that I suspect Btline is quoting is for people leaving / joining / changing trains. If you look at the number of people who pass through a station (whether in and out by rail, or transferring to / from rail) you may get a different result (back to Clapham Junction), then if you add in the tube which - after all - is a railway station ... perhaps we're back to Waterloo, or on to the King's Cross / St Pancras complex? Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: readytostart on September 21, 2009, 16:42:00 Doesn't Clapham Junction have some sort of claim to this as well? Clapham Junction is Europe's (if not the world's minus Tokyo!) busiest station. But it doesn't counts as it is in London! ;) Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: broadgage on October 01, 2009, 16:56:52 A telephone call to FGW customer services suggests that the new timetable wont be on the website until about a week before it starts.
Can this be correct ? does give much notice of any major changes. Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: paul7575 on October 01, 2009, 21:23:22 A telephone call to FGW customer services suggests that the new timetable wont be on the website until about a week before it starts. Can this be correct ? does give much notice of any major changes. That doesn't reflect recent reality, where FGW have usually had the new timetable pdfs available online about 3-4 weeks before the change date. About the same time as they appeared in the racks at stations as well IIRC... Paul Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: willc on October 02, 2009, 00:51:17 A telephone call to FGW customer services suggests that the new timetable wont be on the website until about a week before it starts. Can this be correct ? does give much notice of any major changes. It is, however, now in the FGW website journey planner, along with times up to December 31 - which is a bit daft given that with New Year's Day falling on a Friday this time round, you would have though that putting on the following couple of days' services as well would make sense to help people plan ahead, but that's FGW logic for you... And yes, I know some people like to have the whole service laid out in front of them on a printed page or pdf, but in the days before the internet, it usually was only about a week before the change when you could get your hands on a new pocket timetable. Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Btline on October 02, 2009, 00:57:02 It's useful to be able to look up train times.
But when it comes down to it, I like a timetable booklet. (preferably with some substance, unlike the FGW bit of card) I do not want to have to waste time, ink and paper printing off reams of pdfs onto A4 paper! Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: TheLastMinute on November 13, 2009, 14:04:45 And today's revived from the dead thread is....
The Dec' 09 timetables have now been published on the FGW website (http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/Content.aspx?id=4505). TLM Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: DevonTrains2008 on November 13, 2009, 14:35:49 No, Waterloo is Britain's busiest station by passenger numbers. Not sure what the world's busiest is... How come that it says something along the lines of : Welcome to Clapham Junction - Britain's Busiest Railway Station; on the sign then? I think waterloo is the largest? Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Mookiemoo on November 13, 2009, 14:50:57 No, Waterloo is Britain's busiest station by passenger numbers. Not sure what the world's busiest is... How come that it says something along the lines of : Welcome to Clapham Junction - Britain's Busiest Railway Station; on the sign then? I think waterloo is the largest? I think Clapham is busier in terms of train numbers Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: devon_metro on November 13, 2009, 14:55:14 Far, far busier. Combined with the South Western lines that go to Waterloo, you also have London Overground on the West London Line and the mainline between East Croydon and London Victoria originating from the South Coast.
All you need to do is look at the departure boards, and bear in mind not everything stops there! Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Tim on November 13, 2009, 15:55:28 Waterloo has 62 million passenger entry exits per year and Clapham junction only 12.5 million. However 2000 train pass through it each day (most stopping). It is number 1 on the UK for number of trains stopping and number 1 in Europe for total number of trains passing though if you add in the non-stoppers. About 200,000 per day use the station as an interchange and it is numbr 1 in the UK for NR to NR interchange also.
Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: Tim on November 13, 2009, 16:03:17 see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Train_station#Largest_and_busiest_stations for more info
Title: Re: December 2009 Timetable Post by: IndustryInsider on November 13, 2009, 22:07:35 see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Train_station#Largest_and_busiest_stations for more info Blimey, over 3.5 million punters a day using Shinjuku Station in Japan and over 200 exits? That's not the sort of place you'd want to spend any time if you were claustrophobic! This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |