Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 126
|
1
|
Journey by Journey / Heart of Wessex / Re: Celebrating 30 years of Wessex Wanderers Railway Walks
|
on: May 07, 2025, 18:20:59
|
Yonks ago, and not helpful for your walk, with a friend who was on an educational placement in the area, we were exploring on bikes rather than by train. About a couple of miles east of Chetnole and just south of the village of Leigh, we visited Miz Maze, of which there was not much trace even then and possibly rather less now - perhaps ground resistance measurements would reveal it - but the day was lovely and later on we saw a purple emperor butterly.
Mark
|
|
|
2
|
All across the Great Western territory / The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom / Re: Driving licences and tests - ongoing discussion, merged topics
|
on: May 06, 2025, 09:36:24
|
Thinking about that piece, it makes some sharp observations that apply more widely than the examples it gives. The way that particularly since Covid, but this is something that didn't start with Covid, something that's high priority or high profile is often still handled well and appropriately, it's the lower priority stuff that's often started to drift - and it's that which impacts people's day-to-day living and which gives people the impression that their lives are awry - which leads to consequences, not least in politics. Dragging this on topic, thinking of the railway in the west, while its true that the core, the Great Western Main Line itself is more than a little glass-backed, some of the more minor routes, including the ones that have a sparse service, when it comes to their patterns of service and resilience of their services... well, it's holding back the contribution that they can make to people's lives. Mark
|
|
|
7
|
Journey by Journey / Bristol (WECA) Commuters / Re: Bath Spa station - dealing with future capacity issues - ideas?
|
on: May 02, 2025, 16:59:10
|
How long ago was this "preposterous" idea put forward as being the gospel truth by GWR▸ with regards to the Cardiff - Portsmouth route ?
Until not long before Covid, which was the big nail in that coffin. Instead of that, the core Bristol<>Westbury section has had a decent capacity increase thanks to the additional trains introduced from summer ‘23. I wholeheartedly agree with the extra local capacity and especially the doubling of services it brings to Keynsham and Oldfield Park, and the big improvements at Dilton Marsh and between Warminster and Salisbury. Excellent. What more short trains do, ironically, at Bath Spa is to boost that "hot spot" of people milling about at the top of the stops on the eastbound platform. Radical question - if the stop boards were moved forward (as they are at Melksham) so that local trains stop away from the platform entrance, would that help spread people out? It might enable a more orderly approach to the exits. Playing in Bath Spa's favour is that there's a bit of space on the platforms. After the bad experience at Paddington last year - very full, late, and very standing train arrival, people + me off it at the pointy end of the platform and I had to be first off as I was standing against the door - people getting off and mixing with passengers already on the platform, wanting to move down and board the train we'd arrived on, and then for good measure, another shorter IEP▸ appeared as it departed from the other platform face. If anyone finds themselves in that situation, do what I didn't know to do: step off and make your way to the platform end and wait there for a bit to give things a chance to settle. Mark
|
|
|
8
|
Journey by Journey / Bristol (WECA) Commuters / Re: Bath Spa station - dealing with future capacity issues - ideas?
|
on: May 02, 2025, 11:25:39
|
The platforms at Bath Spa can get very busy indeed and the numbers of people coming in and out of the city "can only grow".
A question from my mailbox asks how the congestion we already see might be eased. I have a whole load of way out ideas
Ten preposterous ideas ... 1. Extend Bristol bound platform over bridge 2. Access ramps rise over river from south bank 3. Three track section to the west becomes main lines on outside with turnback track in centre. 4. Access lifts / escalator in Prezzo Restaurant 5. Re-instate bay plaform at London end / side 6. Make better use of level access already there to car park at London end on London arrival side 7. Make all local trains 5 carriages long and stop them at the end of the platfom where people come on new local entries 8. Could there be a travellator up from the booking hall to the front of the London platform (old bay space)? 9. Could trains run on time to reduce passenger dwell time on platform? 10. Escalator / lifts in bus station to overhead walkway to platform (and across Dorchester Street?) So glad you didn't stray to the dark side and include a list of footfall-suppression techniques. Particularly evil would be to shape the passenger profile, minimising the numbers who would consider rail to travel with children, pushchairs, luggage, or those that for one reason or other, slow crowd movements down. Mark 
|
|
|
9
|
Journey by Journey / Bristol (WECA) Commuters / Re: Bath Spa station - dealing with future capacity issues - ideas?
|
on: May 02, 2025, 09:51:32
|
In the 1950s did BR▸ really propose replacing Bath Spa with a new station on the site of Westmoreland Road goods station? Also, closing the Midland line between Green Park and the outskirts of the city along with the S&D▸ from Midford, replaced with a spur from the GWR▸ line to the Midland west of the city, and a junction close to the Bath Spa station site serving a new-build double track line from there beneath Claverton Down to Monkton Combe, rejoining the S&D south of Midford?
Mark
|
|
|
|