Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7
|
1
|
Journey by Journey / London to the Cotswolds / Re: 2023 Delays and Cancellations
|
on: December 19, 2023, 22:23:52
|
Really Guys Whether GWR▸ cannot decide if they are to run a train or not is not the issue here. Once they have decided to go public and the decision has been made the train is cancelled. I am finding it difficult to understand an argument which supports the use of "will be cancelled" in case they might run it. If circumstances do change and a previously cancelled train can run the standard reinstatement message can be made. Please do not create another situation where railway communications are less than 100% clear
|
|
|
2
|
Journey by Journey / London to the Cotswolds / Re: 2023 Delays and Cancellations
|
on: December 19, 2023, 13:38:24
|
I might be sticking my neck out here but I cringe every time I read xxxx WILL be cancelled. If the decision is made not run a train it IS cancelled. If there is an overwhelming desire by those who update information to us the word WILL could they not say the train WILL not run.
|
|
|
4
|
All across the Great Western territory / The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom / Re: Network Rail is failing.
|
on: December 08, 2023, 22:44:39
|
We have to presume there will be other incidents as well as OHL▸ issues in the future and there will be a continuing need to evacuate trains on running lines. For me the major question coming from this incident is why does it still take a ridiculous amount of time to "free" the passengers. I would like to have an accurate and true diary of management action starting from the time the OHL problem was reported. I ask this as someone who has "moons ago" been the manager on site evacuating trains on the South Western Division (time clue there) of the Southern Region. On one occasion I had to attend a review at divisional headquarters called solely to discover why it took 75 mins to evacuate a train near Shalford Junction. With respect, I do not want to hear answers which major on health and safety, these restraints have always existed (more so on the third rail region!) Perhaps the sharing of the "emergency control management" structure might reveal the something.
|
|
|
6
|
All across the Great Western territory / The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom / Re: Victoria Closure Sunday Evening
|
on: October 25, 2022, 22:28:53
|
If the front of the train was in a position to detrain passengers safely (even if slowly) it should have been done for both customer service and operational reasons (ignoring them might produce an action by frustrated passengers which could produce further problems for the railway). Is it not standard police policy to remove from the site those not directly involved in an incident? I am also not convinced by the suggestion that the scene might be managed by those who had been potentially traumatised by the incident. It would have been managed by the police and an operational duty manager. From what has been said this appears another example of people in control reluctant to make a decision. BUT as so little detail has been officially released one needs to exercise some caution. Were the events such that some confidentiality was needed or were they too embarrassing to reveal. I would really like to know.
|
|
|
|