Show Posts
|
Pages: 1 ... 47 48 [49]
|
721
|
All across the Great Western territory / The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom / Re: "How fast can we build a railway station?" - Network Rail
|
on: December 09, 2019, 16:10:14
|
At the other end of the spectrum - does anyone know why it is taking so long to complete the extension of the platforms between Tilehurst and Cholsey to accommodate 8 coach trains? Nothing seems to have happened for ages, but most seem nearly finished.
Perhaps no-one has worked out how to switch off the announcements on Electrostars that only doors in coaches 1-7 will open at these stations?
A couple of my friends have been caught out by doors on coach 8 not opening. One had her earphones on and didn't hear the announcements but managed to scoot up into Coach 7 and get off. Another failed to emerge from the train and when I phoned her I got a certain amount of invective: there were no warnings she claimed (which I doubt), "no one on the train" to ask, and she didn't know where it was going. For once in my life I was masterful: "Don't worry, dear. In two minutes' time the train will stop at Pangbourne and there'll be one back to Tilehurst in 20 minutes. Or I'll even come and collect you from Pangbourne" - which I did. The platform extensions remain unfinished. Marlburian
|
|
|
722
|
Journey by Journey / London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury / Re: Tilehurst station - facilities, incidents and improvements (merged posts)
|
on: December 09, 2019, 15:56:24
|
I have no problem at all with spaces dedicated to drivers with disabilities (though, as at supermarkets, I wonder about some of the motorists who park in them - and I do appreciate there are "hidden" disabilities). It's just that with a bit of imagination several spaces for others could have been delineated.
I have peered up at various posts to see if there are CCTV▸ cameras on the tops, but haven't spotted any. And there aren't any signs reinforcing the prohibition of parking. I guess the lines are meant to drop a broad hint and may not be enforceable in law. I park on them for a few minutes at quiet times to pick up and see off friends, but they are ignored by many others in the evening rush hour.
Marlburian
|
|
|
723
|
All across the Great Western territory / Looking forward - the next 5, 10 and 20 years / Re: Transport laws to be reviewed to improve everyday journeys
|
on: December 08, 2019, 22:18:58
|
e-scooters (and those of a push-along variety)....
Road-going or pavement going? topic desparately needs discussing & regulating....are they to be allowed on the roads and/or pavements? They're ann accident waiting to happen on both - against pedestrins the way they hog the pavement & try to pass pedestrians, thinking they have more rights than pedestrians and pushing past on busy pavements when they have no more rights to go faster than walkers....
But on the road, certainly in urban areas, face dangers more than cyclists do. Unprotected, no requirement for helmets or other protective clothing. No lights, minimal brakes, etc etc.
On Friday a youth was circling the concourse at Charing Cross station on an e-scooter - I wasn't sure if this was specifically against the bye-laws? E-scooters, traditional scooters and roller-skates can be great ways of getting around, and e-bikes are now becoming popular. Trouble is that they don't mix well with road vehicles, pedestrians and, indeed, each other. A friend of mine who cycles around London curses e-bikes and scooters using cycle lanes. And there's a sizeable minority of users of these minority forms of transport with "attitude". Pity, as well as environmental considerations, they take up far less space, both on the road and when parked, than solitary commuters in their SUVs. Marlburian
|
|
|
725
|
Journey by Journey / London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury / Re: Tilehurst station - facilities, incidents and improvements (merged posts)
|
on: December 08, 2019, 16:54:44
|
The capacity of short-stay parking on the concourse at Tilehurst Station has diminished over the years, what with hatched lines reserving a space for an ambulance (always slightly annoying when the driver ignores it and parks close to his Portacabin), two spaces dedicated to disabled drivers, another for the station staff member (who works only mornings), and another surrendered to an electrification gantry. But outside peak hours four or five cars could happily be parked so their drivers could wait for and see off passengers.
Then "they" painted double-yellow lines, leaving just one formal parking-space for short-stays. Curiously "they" did not extend the yellow lines in front of bollards protecting the cycle storage units, and it's possible to leave a car there for a few minutes. With a bit more imagination, at least four more short-stay bays could have been created.
The double-yellows are routinely ignored when more than a couple of cars are at the station for a few minutes. And they are completely ignored in the evening rush-hour when friends and families collect commuters, with cars spilling back onto the busy main road.
Marlburian
|
|
|
726
|
Journey by Journey / London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury / Re: Timetable changes making commute longer
|
on: December 08, 2019, 16:32:07
|
Hi Grahame, and thanks for that. Whilst you were posting, I was looking at Timetable T10, thanks to a link elsewhere on this Forum. I'd sussed out that blue-shaded times meant that one would need an Anytime ticket, but hadn't picked up on Note "A". So that's reassuring, though I hope that the ticket lady has realised this too. Up to now, when I've bought a One-Day Travelcard for the 0855 she's always asked if I'm staying on the train to Paddington. In fact, I've forestalled her by assuring her that I am.
(Let it be whispered, ever so softly and just between you and me, that up to March I might just have switched on to the Central Line at Ealing Broadway ..)
Curiously T10 suggests that a couple of "easements" for off-peak tickets in the evening rush hour will continue for semi-fast 1840 and 1920 departures to Tilehurst and beyond, as well other semi-fasts to Reading.
As you say, "complicated". I'll be at Tilehurst Station mid-morning on Tuesday and shall collect a new timetable - and ask the ticket lady how Monday went ...
I won't be travelling to London until February, so hopefully by then the dust will have settled.
Marlburian
|
|
|
727
|
Journey by Journey / London to Kennet Valley / Re: Midgham Station 1943
|
on: December 08, 2019, 15:43:22
|
Thanks for pointing that out, Red Squirrel. Of course there's the other curiosity that Midgham Station is actually in the village of Woolhampton but was named after another, even smaller, village a couple of miles away to avoid confusing travellers wishing to go to Wolverhampton and Wolverton.
Marlburian
|
|
|
728
|
Journey by Journey / London to Kennet Valley / Midgham Station 1943
|
on: December 08, 2019, 14:52:39
|
Midgham Station featured briefly in a 1943 film advising American soldiers on: How to behave in BritainAround 22.45 in the film, the soldier arrives there and walks past a sign for the Reading company C & G Ayres. He wants to get to Cirencester, but the station-master seems to think he means to get to Chichester and tells him to change at Reading! There's a sign saying it's Midgham Station. His train comes in drawn by a tank engine running boiler-first. But it leaves bunker-first, with a footbridge in the background that definitely isn't Midgham - this would have been a piece of stock film inserted into the footage made for the film. To get to Cirencester in those days, the soldier would have travelled from Reading to Kemble and changed on to the branch line for Cirencester. A longer route would have been to head west to Savernake Station and change onto the Midland & South Western Junction Railway through Marlborough and Swindon. Marlburian
|
|
|
729
|
Journey by Journey / London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury / Re: Timetable changes making commute longer
|
on: December 08, 2019, 10:10:28
|
As another newbie I hope it's OK to piggyback on this thread as my comments relate to the new timetable and local stations between Reading and Didcot. Nowadays I only travel off-peak from Tilehurst, including to London. A few days ago, I looked at the new timetable on the National Rail website and twitched about new restrictions on travel, with the first service on which off-peak tickets to London are valid apparently being the 0947 - until now it's been the 0855. But GWR▸ 's own timetable suggests off-peak fares will still apply to the 0855 (which gets into Paddington shortly after 1000). The very pleasant ticket lady at Tilehurst reckoned that off-peak would only apply to the 0927 and subsequent services.
Incidentally up to last week the National Rail website was suggesting that off-peak fares to Reading would be available for morning rush-hour services - too good to be true, and the glitch has now been corrected.
It's a minor pain that off-peak tickets will no longer be valid in the evening on semi-fasts to Tilehurst and beyond (42-45 minutes' journeys). The ticket lady pointed out one can still use the TFL▸ trains - 65 minutes to Reading and no loos!
(With regard to there being no toilets, I wonder how this will affect Friday and Saturday night "revelers" who have spent the evening drinking?)
|
|
|
730
|
All across the Great Western territory / Introductions and chat / Tilehurst commuter of many decades
|
on: December 08, 2019, 09:49:05
|
Hullo! I've been using Tilehurst Station since 1974 for commuting either into Reading or to London. I've seen lots of changes there: the demolition of the old goods shed, a new waiting room on Platform 4, a new footbridge, electrification. I have memories of waiting on cold December mornings, with the ticket clerk popping out of his office to shout "0710 ten minutes late" and dashing back in to groans from passengers!
Generally I've been satisfied with the service and the staff.
I'm interested in railway history and have visited the sites of many former stations and track beds. I also research "military Wiltshire 1897-1920", including the movement of thousands of troops and their equipment for annual manoeuvres and mobilization in 1914. (Lavington and Patney & Chirton stations were frequently used by military trains.)
Marlburian
|
|
|
|