Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:35 01 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1964)
Helicopter service from Penzance to Scilly Isles starts (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
16:28 Basingstoke to Reading
16:33 Reading to Basingstoke
16:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
16:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:59 Basingstoke to Reading
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:15 Reading to Basingstoke
17:20 Basingstoke to Reading
17:38 Reading to Basingstoke
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:53 Basingstoke to Reading
17:57 Reading to Basingstoke
18:17 Basingstoke to Reading
18:29 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
18:32 Reading to Basingstoke
18:37 Basingstoke to Reading
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:05 Reading to Basingstoke
19:07 Basingstoke to Reading
19:25 Reading to Basingstoke
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
15:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
16:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
18:10 Taunton to Cardiff Central
Delayed
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
15:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:18 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:22 Swansea to London Paddington
16:35 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
16:35 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 16:51:55 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[95] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[82] Cash payments for transport services
[79] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
[38] May Timetable Change
[38] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: DfT confirms it will not implement overcrowding limits on busy services  (Read 1569 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43947



View Profile WWW Email
« on: December 13, 2017, 19:01:17 »



From Rail Technology Magazine

Quote

DfT» (Department for Transport - about) confirms it will not implement overcrowding limits on busy services

Rail minister Paul Maynard has confirmed that the government will not be introducing a maximum passenger limit for overcrowded trains.

Answering a written question from MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) Sharon Hodgson, Maynard said passengers prized the flexibility of the walk-on system of travel and the DfT had no intention of changing.

Hodgson asked the minister what assessment had been made of the potential merits of maximum occupancy limits on services.
Maynard replied: “One of the most popular features of the UK (United Kingdom) railways is that it’s a walk-on, or turn up and go service. This flexibility is much prized by passengers.

[article continues]
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4532


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2017, 21:08:53 »

Its nothing to do with "the passengers prized the flexibility of the walk-on system" more to do with DfT» (Department for Transport - about) not able to fund the capacity enhancements needed
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2141


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2017, 10:27:11 »

Dredging an ageing memory, didn't the report after the Clapham crash say that overcrowding should be controlled?
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8644



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2017, 10:35:09 »

Its nothing to do with "the passengers prized the flexibility of the walk-on system" more to do with DfT» (Department for Transport - about) not able to fund the capacity enhancements needed

I wonder if passengers were asked whether they "prized the flexibility of the walk-on system" over the ability to travel in a safe environment where they were able to breathe and inhabit more than a postage stamp sized area of space rather than being crammed into unreliable cattle trucks, which they would prioritise?

In one of the wealthiest countries on the planet, with handsomely remunerated Industry Leaders, huge resources and workforces and sky high fares, surely it shouldn't be too much to ask to have both flexibility and safety and perhaps even a modicum of comfort?
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2017, 16:59:28 »

I certainly value the flexibility of a walk up system. 

I'd favour some overcrowding limits, but it depends what they are.

A limit which denies passengers the right to board when a service is overcrowded would not be welcome (bearing in mind that folk who don't want to board can always take the next service)

A limit which triggers some investment when regularly breached or financially incentivises the ToC to solve the problem might be a good idea. 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page