Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:55 01 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1972)
Bristol Parkway station opens

Train RunningCancelled
15:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
16:28 Basingstoke to Reading
16:33 Reading to Basingstoke
16:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
16:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:59 Basingstoke to Reading
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:15 Reading to Basingstoke
17:20 Basingstoke to Reading
17:38 Reading to Basingstoke
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:53 Basingstoke to Reading
17:57 Reading to Basingstoke
18:17 Basingstoke to Reading
18:29 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
18:32 Reading to Basingstoke
18:37 Basingstoke to Reading
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:05 Reading to Basingstoke
19:07 Basingstoke to Reading
19:25 Reading to Basingstoke
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
15:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
18:10 Taunton to Cardiff Central
Delayed
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
15:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:18 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:22 Swansea to London Paddington
16:35 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 17:04:37 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[95] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[82] Cash payments for transport services
[79] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
[38] May Timetable Change
[38] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Electrification  (Read 12795 times)
Northerner
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 12


View Profile Email
« Reply #30 on: December 10, 2008, 17:13:49 »

Sorry to change the topic again. BUT if the turbos are limited in where they can go then the midland main line ought to be electrified because doing that would put more capcity on cross country, nottingham-cardiff, liverpool-norwich, portsmouth-cardiff and birmingham-stanstead. Plus think about what all the 158 & turbostars from there could do. This would be done by sending the long merdians & hst on the mml to xc, voyagers replaced by HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) & short merdians to the routes above. SURLY then that is better than having the constrated turbos even of it does not benefit the west as much. Huh
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4532


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: December 10, 2008, 18:15:23 »

Sorry to change the topic again. BUT if the turbos are limited in where they can go then the midland main line ought to be electrified because doing that would put more capcity on cross country, nottingham-cardiff, liverpool-norwich, portsmouth-cardiff and birmingham-stanstead. Plus think about what all the 158 & turbostars from there could do. This would be done by sending the long merdians & hst on the mml to xc, voyagers replaced by HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) & short merdians to the routes above. SURLY then that is better than having the constrated turbos even of it does not benefit the west as much. Huh
By the time the Government fund route electrification much of the current rolling stock will be either life expired 165/6 or half life, it is not until 2017 ie CP 6 that NR» (Network Rail - home page) thing the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) will fund such a venture
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Northerner
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 12


View Profile Email
« Reply #32 on: December 20, 2008, 10:41:58 »

How old are the 158s now. just over 20 years old and are providing capacity boost for such franchises as northern. How about the HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units))? They are 25-30 years old and most have just been re-engined putting another 20 years life in them. I'm sorry but does this not show that if we re planing to get rid of trains built in 2003ish (meridians) & 2002ish (voyagers) in 2203 and 2202 then will we not have capcity problems there and is it not wastefull?
Logged
Don
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: December 20, 2008, 16:59:57 »

How old are the 158s now. just over 20 years old and are providing capacity boost for such franchises as northern. How about the HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units))? They are 25-30 years old and most have just been re-engined putting another 20 years life in them. I'm sorry but does this not show that if we re planing to get rid of trains built in 2003ish (meridians) & 2002ish (voyagers) in 2203 and 2202 then will we not have capcity problems there and is it not wastefull?

I'm hoping that they keep refurbishing the HSTs.  I would be much happier if they chuck out the noisy, vibrating toilet-smelling Voyagers,  before the calm, quiet, relaxed (and 30-year-old) HSTs.

I vote for a new batch of HSTs, with power cars at the end and not underneath, and if electrification happens to occur. New or refurbished electric power cars sound like a great option.
Logged

Regards,
Don.
Northerner
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 12


View Profile Email
« Reply #34 on: December 30, 2008, 11:41:15 »

How old are the 158s now. just over 20 years old and are providing capacity boost for such franchises as northern. How about the HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units))? They are 25-30 years old and most have just been re-engined putting another 20 years life in them. I'm sorry but does this not show that if we re planing to get rid of trains built in 2003ish (meridians) & 2002ish (voyagers) in 2203 and 2202 then will we not have capcity problems there and is it not wastefull?

I'm hoping that they keep refurbishing the HSTs.  I would be much happier if they chuck out the noisy, vibrating toilet-smelling Voyagers,  before the calm, quiet, relaxed (and 30-year-old) HSTs.

I vote for a new batch of HSTs, with power cars at the end and not underneath, and if electrification happens to occur. New or refurbished electric power cars sound like a great option.

Your right a re-engined/refubished train is in some ways as good as (if not better) than a new one. Look at the Welsh Assambaly goverment express. That seems nicer than the voyagers which operate the London service.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page