Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:15 07 May 2025
 
- Minimum age to be a train driver lowered to 18
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
7th May (2017)
Day 1, All The Stations (link)

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 07, 2025, 16:30:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[76] Subtle train time changes
[59] Major rail disruption after blaze close to tracks between Newp...
[56] 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[44] April across the South West - May bank holiday quiz
[34] Gloucester station needs an east-facing bay platform
[28] Pilning Station - where are we, and looking at future options ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: CHAOS 15/10/2007  (Read 4170 times)
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« on: October 15, 2007, 18:11:08 »

Network Rail (and their contractors) excelled themselves this morning by an engineering possession which over ran by about 3 hours.

At one point during the disruption the 07:10 Bristol Temple Meads - London Paddington via Bristol Parkway which WAS running this morning was revised to operate via Bath Spa and Chippenham this morning due to the BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI) but BTM is a commonly used alternative)) to PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) services being diverted, but not calling at BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains). Then at the normal time for this service to depart all was ready except the signal stayed at red. This passed about 15 minutes of time and as the time for the next BTM - PAD service was approaching, the 07:10 was cancelled,

In total I saw there were about 25 services which were either cancelled, re-routed, started at a point into the journey by-passing Bath, terminating short of destinations not serving Bath or had additional stops inserted into their schedules this morning to cover for the missing services.

Included in the cancellations was this mornings up Melksham service to Swindon.

That what comes of Network Rail scheduling 8 hours work to be done in a 4 hour possession.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6628


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2007, 18:18:01 »

Pathetic! I bet there were many angry passengers at Bath Spa this morning as well as other stations that would have been affected. Did FGW (First Great Western) lay on replacement buses?
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2007, 18:42:22 »

Pathetic! I bet there were many angry passengers at Bath Spa this morning as well as other stations that would have been affected. Did FGW (First Great Western) lay on replacement buses?

None of the service incidents I logged had any info re replacement road transport.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2007, 18:44:49 »

Very short notice.

I'd like Network Rail to apologise so that FGW (First Great Western) don't get lumped with the majority of the blame.
Logged
Jim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1186


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2007, 18:53:37 »

Very short notice.

I'd like Network Rail to apologise so that FGW (First Great Western) don't get lumped with the majority of the blame.
They could of delt with the chaos better though!
Logged

Cheers
Jim Smiley
AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 16, 2007, 13:31:38 »

Very short notice.

I'd like Network Rail to apologise so that FGW (First Great Western) don't get lumped with the majority of the blame.
They could of delt with the chaos better though!
Thats easy to say Jim but i've been working in that sort of chaos and theres not really much the TOC (Train Operating Company) can do, you can never get replacement busses in the morning because they're all on shool runs etc.
Logged
Jim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1186


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 16, 2007, 15:29:00 »

Very short notice.

I'd like Network Rail to apologise so that FGW (First Great Western) don't get lumped with the majority of the blame.
They could of delt with the chaos better though!
Thats easy to say Jim but i've been working in that sort of chaos and theres not really much the TOC (Train Operating Company) can do, you can never get replacement busses in the morning because they're all on shool runs etc.

Very true
Logged

Cheers
Jim Smiley
AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 16, 2007, 21:17:56 »

Very short notice.

I'd like Network Rail to apologise so that FGW (First Great Western) don't get lumped with the majority of the blame.
They could of delt with the chaos better though!
Thats easy to say Jim but i've been working in that sort of chaos and theres not really much the TOC (Train Operating Company) can do, you can never get replacement busses in the morning because they're all on shool runs etc.

Very true

But is there anything stopping FGW passengers from using First buses between Bath and Bristol or points in between in cases of disruption, after all at the end of the day FGW profits together with those of First Buses profits all end up in the pockets of the First Group shareholders.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page