Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:35 01 May 2025
 
- Snake halts Japanese bullet trains after wrapping around power line
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1971)
Amtrak founded (*)

Train RunningCancelled
11:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
12:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
13:05 London Paddington to Newbury
13:23 London Paddington to Oxford
13:25 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
13:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
13:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
13:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
13:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
14:12 Newbury to Reading
14:25 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
14:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
14:34 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
14:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
14:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
15:03 Oxford to London Paddington
15:07 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
15:25 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
15:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
15:34 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
15:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
15:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
16:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
17:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
18:00 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
18:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
19:05 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
Short Run
10:59 Great Malvern to London Paddington
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
12:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
13:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:09 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:48 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:15 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
Delayed
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
11:57 Great Malvern to London Paddington
12:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
12:51 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
13:00 Oxford to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
14:06 London Paddington to Newbury
14:23 London Paddington to Oxford
etc
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 13:36:28 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[112] Cash payments for transport services
[69] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[53] May Timetable Change
[52] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
[36] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
[36] What and why - on the platform
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: More Oxfordshire folk let the train take the strain in 2008/09  (Read 5503 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19585



View Profile Email
« on: April 07, 2010, 19:39:07 »

From the Oxford Mail:

Quote
The number of people travelling by train in Oxfordshire grew even as the recession first began to bite, according to newly-released figures.

In 2008-9, Oxford station was the start or end of 5,491,802 journeys, up 16.5 per cent on 2007-8, when 4,076,814 journeys were recorded, according to the Office for Rail Regulation.

The biggest percentage increase in custom came at Appleford station, just as train operator First Great Western was preparing to make controversial cuts ^ since reversed ^ in off-peak trains calling there from last May.

In 2008-9, 10,814 journeys were recorded, up 32.8 per cent on the previous year, while at nearby Culham, where cuts were also made last May, 60,146 journeys began or ended there, up 28.4 per cent from 2007-8.

Dr Angela Jones, one of the passengers who campaigned against the cuts at Appleford, said: ^The figures show a very high usage of the station, given the village^s population, and people^s commitment to the train service.

^I would be very surprised, given the numbers I see on the platform each morning, if we didn^t get a similar rise in the current year^s figures.

^It^s clear there was no justification for the cuts. Appleford, Culham and Radley are all well used, usage is up at all three, and this strengthens the argument for maintaining and increasing the number of trains calling.^

FGW (First Great Western) spokesman Dan Panes said: ^The services we initially reduced at Appleford were at specific times of the day, while the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) figures are for all passengers passing through the stations, so it^s impossible to make direct comparisons.

^When we made the decision, fewer customers had been using Appleford since 2005 and, at the time, the ORR figures backed up these findings.

^Even with the sharp increase in custom we saw last year, only 200 more people per year are using the station than in 2005. By speaking to the local community, we were able to pinpoint increases in demand, even before the figures were available, and reverse the decision.^

Booming business on the Oxford-Bicester Town branch line will be used by the Oxford-Bicester Rail Action Group to help press the Government to increase the minimum guaranteed number of trains serving Bicester Town and Islip when the line transfers from FGW to Chiltern Railways next year to become part of a second Oxford-London route.

Bicester Town saw 60,638 journeys, up 17 per cent from 51,902 a year earlier, in part thanks to extra trains funded by the county, reversing cuts made in 2006.

At Islip, custom was up by 20 per cent, to 17,062 journeys from 14,120, though still short of the 18,988 seen in 2004-5.

OBRAG chairman Dr Ian East said the growth had been maintained after the end of the counting period, with FGW telling the group that in the 12 months to last September, there were 19,833 journeys at Islip and 77,258 at Bicester Town. He said: ^These figures show the remarkable effect of the four extra trains a day.^
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13350


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2010, 09:51:40 »

The County Council have offered Chiltern the same deal as they have with FGW (First Great Western) to subsidise extra services. The ball is firmly in Chiltern's court to to the deal.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2010, 17:39:39 »

The County Council have offered Chiltern the same deal as they have with FGW (First Great Western) to subsidise extra services. The ball is firmly in Chiltern's court to to the deal.

The advantage Chiltern have is that any stops at the minor stations will be in through services that will be passing anyway, at 2 tph (trains per hour).  In principle, the costs of a decent Chiltern service at say Islip should be pretty marginal compared to extra stops in FGW's existing service to Bicester Town?

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13350


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2010, 09:57:23 »

No extra trains at Islip (they'll all drive to Water Eaton anyway, more's the pity!), but extra trains to Bicester Town.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page