Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:35 02 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
06:28 Reading to Gatwick Airport
07:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
06:02 Bristol Parkway to Carmarthen
07:00 Worcester Shrub Hill to Didcot Parkway
09:21 Carmarthen to London Paddington
Delayed
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2025, 07:48:30 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[93] Low passenger numbers due to train unreliability
[56] A very easy riddle
[49] Warmest day of year as UK temperature hits 24.9C - April 2025
[48] Spain / Portugal power outage
[37] Brighton Belle - merged topics
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: ICE3 at STP.  (Read 8768 times)
Brucey
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2259


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: October 19, 2010, 08:30:18 »

Train has arrived, there is now a short video on the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) News website
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11567753
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 19, 2010, 09:09:33 »

I think the perceived danger is that a 400 metre train will always stop beside an escape door thus passengers detraining will have a train beside them on the whole length of their walk.

that is the issue, and although Grahame is right to question this requirement in comparison with domestic tunnels, it needs to be remembered that the Chunnel has had 3 serious fires already.  Mind you, I think that the last one demonstrated that escape into the service tunnel isn't straightforward even when there is an escape door near as smoke and confusion can prevent efficient evacuation to it.  Proper signage, and the availability well trained staff would IMHO ('in my humble opinion') be much more important factors in an evacuation.   
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4532


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: October 19, 2010, 16:02:29 »

The tunnel and train safety systems were designed over 20 years ago, technology used in trains has changed, lessons (should have) learned especially from the shambles last winter on how to evacuate and or rescue a train.

I feel that a new operator wanting to move in will raise the game of the existing operator, it will also open up the market for new rolling stock at 20 years old the Eroustar fleet is over half life given the time for procurement and testing of new trains the process needs to start soon.

With DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) proposal to operate trains through the tunnel may be they might act out Edward Watkin's dream and run a train over his London extension using a TOC (Train Operating Company) that DB already own
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: October 19, 2010, 19:06:53 »

With DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) proposal to operate trains through the tunnel may be they might act out Edward Watkin's dream and run a train over his London extension using a TOC (Train Operating Company) that DB already own

Nice idea, but I'd suspect there's little likelihood of DB rebuilding any UK (United Kingdom) infrastructure to meet their gauging requirements, or buying UK gauge 'toy trains' to run on the continental network...

Sad

Paul
Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 979


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: October 19, 2010, 22:10:40 »


Came through Londres Midi at 1750, today, Tuesday 19/10, off EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about) and saw the ICE. Very impressive if a bit retro in style - rather VW beetle in fact.

Like French Eurostars that show the logo "SNCF (Societe Nationale des Chemins de fer Francais - French National Railways)" on their noses, it sports plenty of proud "DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about)" signs (means German Federal Railways).

If a National Railway is an icon of national (and ruling class) competence then it reflects badly on our betters.

I'm glad to see the Europeans working into UK (United Kingdom) - just incandescent with those traitors who destroyed our National Railway.

OTC
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: October 19, 2010, 22:38:07 »

Quote
the Chunnel has had 3 serious fires already

All three of which started on lorry shuttle trains which didn't have fire suppressing equipment on them, which doesn't strike me as very hyper-safety-conscious, given the serious damage that two of them did.

Quote
Nice idea, but I'd suspect there's little likelihood of DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) rebuilding any UK (United Kingdom) infrastructure to meet their gauging requirements, or buying UK gauge 'toy trains' to run on the continental network...

You might be surprised. The ICE-T (for tilt) and the ICE-TD (diesel variant) do have smaller body profiles and could well fit on much ex-GWR (Great Western Railway) infrastructure

I posted the following back in December 2008 in a thread about electrification where clearances were mentioned in the context of future use for Turbos.

Quote
Getting slightly off-topic, the current issue of Today's Railways Europe says that when DB stored its tilting ICE-TD DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) in 2002-3, an unnamed UK operator did go to look at them with a view to using them on ex-GWR routes, because the tilt capability meant they are slightly narrower than your typical European train and would fit through Brunel bridges. The stumbling block was their length, at 27m more typical of Europe, which meant they would foul curved platforms

Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: October 20, 2010, 09:09:31 »

Intersting last comment willc re 27 mtr coaches wasn't IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) meant to be 26 m?

Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: October 20, 2010, 14:47:22 »

Indeed, which would have required something to be done to the platforms at places like Bath and Bristol Temple Meads, to name but two.

Should perhaps add that the ICE-TD is Germany's answer to the Adelante, just 20 built and a rather chequered record, thought they do seem to have settled down in recent years, working Hamburg-Denmark services. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICE_TD
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: October 20, 2010, 16:01:24 »

And what should have just landed in my inbox, quite by coincidence I'm sure, but an email from Eurostar, urging me to use its services to reach Cologne...
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page