Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:35 01 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1851)
Great Exhibition opens (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport
15:30 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
15:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
16:07 Reading to Basingstoke
16:28 Basingstoke to Reading
16:33 Reading to Basingstoke
16:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
16:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:59 Basingstoke to Reading
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:15 Reading to Basingstoke
17:20 Basingstoke to Reading
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
17:38 Reading to Basingstoke
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:57 Reading to Basingstoke
18:29 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
18:32 Reading to Basingstoke
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:05 Reading to Basingstoke
19:25 Reading to Basingstoke
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
18:10 Taunton to Cardiff Central
Delayed
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
15:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:18 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:22 Swansea to London Paddington
16:35 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
16:35 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 16:40:00 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[102] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[101] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[87] Cash payments for transport services
[84] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
[41] May Timetable Change
[40] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: No more painted cycle lanes?  (Read 2519 times)
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2141


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« on: June 22, 2021, 17:09:12 »

A letter has been sent to local authorities saying that to access the next tranche of cycling funding, schemes most comply LTN1/20 Cycle Infrastructure Design.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonreid/2021/06/16/no-funding-for-paint-uk-government-warns-local-authorities-to-be-ambitious-when-bidding-for-cycling-cash/?sh=6dca809a31ce
Carlton Reid says the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) letter says that painted and advisory cycle lanes will not be funded. The letter also says that schemes “should be given sufficient time to bed in and for benefits to be realised before any changes are made". Obviously aimed at local authorities such as Shoreham and various councils in Surrey who removed lanes within weeks of installation.

Presumably some of Reading's proposed schemes will bite the dust.

Quote
The DfT is also seeking four local authorities to take part in a pilot to provide cycling and walking interventions as part of a social prescribing offer via doctors’ surgeries, known as general practices, or GPs.
I think there is some work to be done to convince about social prescribing.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2021, 17:37:27 »

Probably a good move on balance. I think it will result in far fewer cycle schemes overall being implemented but those that do get put it will be more effective. But the main benefit will IMO ('in my opinion') come not from cycling, but from walking and other non-driving uses of roads, not just in the LTNs (Low Traffic Neighbourhood) but through more widespread redistribution of road space:
Quote
“to receive any money under this or future tranches, you will need to show us that you have a swift and meaningful plan to reallocate road space to cyclists and pedestrians, including strategic corridors.”
Also:
Quote
“Consultation does not mean giving anyone a veto, requiring consensus on schemes, or prioritising the loudest voices,” adds Furness.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 882


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2021, 18:32:22 »

I will be very interested to see how, if at all, this decision changes the approach of DCC» (Devon County Council - website) (Devon County Council). At present there is very little properly segregated, from both vehicular & pedestrian traffic, cycling infrastructure in my local area (Exeter and East & Central Devon) but DCC obviously have a pretty large stock of white, green & red/brown paint.

As I have mentioned previously their preferred solutions seem to be a solid white line down the middle of what used to be a pedestrians only footway (without cognisance of the overall width) or a broken white line on the nearside of the carriageway if no separate footway exists.
Logged
Ralph Ayres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 424


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2021, 11:48:57 »

This might reduce the number of poor quality schemes.  What it doesn't do though is offer any incentive or encouragement to those councils who are less than enthusiastic about providing any cycle facilities at all.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page