Darwin Award Hopeful?

johnneyw

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 2559

From station to station, back to Bristol city....

Darwin Award Hopeful?

« on: May 21, 2025, 17:41:24 »

As reported in this article, the incident has prompted Network Rail to apply for closure of this crossing.

https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/england-trespasser-railway-track-b2753590.html


	Logged

broadgage

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 5695

Re: Darwin Award Hopeful?

« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 23:53:17 »

As they were presumably still capable of breeding, not eligible for a Darwin award.
To be eligible for a Darwin award, a person must be unable to pass on their obviously defective genes. This may be achieved by death, or less commonly by destroying or removing the breeding equipment.

Possibly an honourable mention instead.

One of my favourite Darwin awards was an American whose car radio ceased to function due to a blown fuse, they used a live rifle round as a substitute. In time the passage of current fired the round, which removed or destroyed the breeding parts.


	Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU^▸ is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.

grahame

Administrator
Hero Member

Posts: 44211

Re: Darwin Award Hopeful?

« Reply #2 on: Today at 10:11:13 »

Quote from: johnneyw on May 21, 2025, 17:41:24

As reported in this article, the incident has prompted Network Rail to apply for closure of this crossing.

I have two minds about the application. Undoubtedly there are idiots sprinkled around from time to time - but is the stupid/thoughtless action of a (very?) few really justification for applying for a closure order. Far more convenient for NR^» to extinguish a crossing (or remove a footbridge some times) than to fulfil their [moral/legal] duty to the wider general public. Reminds me of the 9.11 "convenient time to release bad news". I can understand the temptation to slip in changes ... removal of footbridge at Pilning, these idiots in the video, death on the Pilning crossing which (to me and to be confirmed?) Network Rail were hardly blameless over.


	Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member

Western Pathfinder

Global Moderator
Hero Member

Posts: 1668

Re: Darwin Award Hopeful?

« Reply #3 on: Today at 17:12:43 »

Loss of life on the crossing was back in 2021, never heard anymore about it You ?.


	Logged

Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: [1]

« previous next »