My sympathy to all you poor Thames Valley commuters who have to endure the Turbos on a hot day.
One of the many reasons I decided to retire a couple of years early and avoid the daily commute was to avoid paying
FGW▸ ^2k a year a for the priviledge of travelling of hot overcrowded unpuntuctual Turbos. Plus an added Underground journey, fortunately on the Hammersmith so slighly cooler than the Bakerloo.
FGW seem to have done something about the punctuality, but the 166 a/c problems and 165 draft problems don't seem to have been cured. Also overcrowding still seems to be a problem on some services.
The ultimate answer, of course, would be to fit the Chiltern a/c kit to all the 165s and 166s, but sadly there's no sign either First or the leasing company is willing to cough up for it, even though these trains are probably only half way through their working lives.
willc comment just sums up the stupidity of the franchise system and the allocation of rolling stock. There is no incentive for either the
TOC▸ or
ROSCO» to fit decent a/c to the 165/6s.