Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:15 08 Jun 2026
 
- M&S launches new traineeship for 1,000 young people
- 'A World Cup for them not us': Fans' anger at US travel bans and visa restrictions
- Five people injured in stabbing at New York City's Penn Station
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 13/06/26 - RailFuture Severnside AGM
20/06/26 - Hastings Diesel at Paignton ?
04/07/26 - Railfuture AGM
09/07/26 - Melksham TUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 8th Jun

Train RunningCancelled
05:58 Exeter St Davids to Paignton
07:25 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
07:19 Paignton to Exmouth
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
June 08, 2026, 06:30:12 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[102] An update from the German / Swiss border lands
[90] Circumetnea, anyone ?
[89] Trees falling onto railway lines, causing disruption - ongoing...
[77] Wokingham station - improvements, resignalling and siding - me...
[56] Ofcom research into mobile network and wifi performance on tra...
[38] BBC Exclusive access: Testing London's next-generation Piccadi...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
Author Topic: Reopening former rail line between Hythe and Totton - ongoing discussion, merged topic  (Read 66557 times)
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2724


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: May 13, 2026, 09:40:11 »

From Rail Advent[/utl]

Quote
A decision is expected soon by the Office of Rail and Road for Alliance Rail’s proposed new service from Marchwood to Southampton and London Waterloo.

The decision is expected within the next two months.

Work has progressed to develop a timetable and make the Class 769 trains ready for use.

Looks like the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) has sunk this one, for now at least.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c202n2zlz85o
Logged
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 983



View Profile
« Reply #46 on: May 13, 2026, 09:48:14 »

£45M to upgrade this short branch line from freight-only to passenger use seems exorbitant.  Were they planning on building the new station at Hythe out of kryptonite, or something?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10713


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: May 13, 2026, 10:51:53 »

£45M to upgrade this short branch line from freight-only to passenger use seems exorbitant.  Were they planning on building the new station at Hythe out of kryptonite, or something?

Quite cheap I thought. 

To plan and build a new fully accessible station and facilities around it, improve the signalling, replaced some of the old track and drainage, and probably deal with some existing foot crossings.

Not saying it should be that expensive, but that’s the way it is these days.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
John D
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 315


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: May 13, 2026, 11:20:04 »

£45M to upgrade this short branch line from freight-only to passenger use seems exorbitant.  Were they planning on building the new station at Hythe out of kryptonite, or something?

Quite cheap I thought. 

To plan and build a new fully accessible station and facilities around it, improve the signalling, replaced some of the old track and drainage, and probably deal with some existing foot crossings.

Not saying it should be that expensive, but that’s the way it is these days.

Building a single platform station that is basically on a flat site (not on embankment or cutting) accessed by a shortish shallow ramp, on a line that only sees infrequent trains (so few hours possession is almost free) really should not cost £45m.

Modular standard platform sections, single storey building, and about £40m to gold plate the scheme, fix a bit of drainage, and update some semaphore signals protecting crossings.  (All the area around Totton junction was resignalled as part of massive Southampton area scheme about 1983)
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5365


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: May 13, 2026, 13:23:10 »

The BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) report’s total cost probably comes from the original RYR (Restoring Your Railway) proposal that wanted two or three new stations, (as even Marchwood would need a major rebuild), additional rolling stock and staff costs, and I think some minor changes at Southampton to make P5 signalled for passenger use. The latter looking a simple matter but anything to do with signalling seems to cost £millions.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2026, 13:24:18 by paul7575 » Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1979



View Profile
« Reply #50 on: May 13, 2026, 20:13:25 »

Immediately, CfN (Chris from Nailsea, an administrator on this forum)'s recent post on Winnersh Triangle came to mind-

Quote
Those were the days [referring to the mid-1980s]when a new railway station could be built for just £375,000

With the closure of the Hythe ferry, and all the congestion problems where the A35 crosses the Test at Eling and meets the M271 (never mind further on as traffic stacks back on the Avenue and A35 going into central Southampton), all the housing built in the last 60 years along Waterside from Fawley to Marchwood and Ed Miliband wittering on interminably about the Government's commitment to reducing carbon emissions, I find this inexplicable. This must have a much better net impact than the re-opening of the Cowley branch, where there already seems to be 6 or 7 bus routes to Oxford city centre and no substantial river estuary impeding access to the local regional centre.
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 573


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: May 14, 2026, 09:05:00 »

The Cowley branch is set to reopen as a result of the multi-billion-pound EIT facility being developed at Oxford Science Park. The project is expected to create up to 7,000 jobs, and EIT has also helped fund the reopening.

Interestingly, the push for the scheme came from the Treasury rather than the Department for Transport. The DfT» (Department for Transport - about) had previously stated that there was no further funding available for rail improvements, so the announcement of the reopening came as a surprise to many industry observers. I suspect there was a conversation between Ellison and the Government regarding transport links to Oxford Science Park, given the scale of the investment being made there and whether those investments would continue.

But I agree that the line to Marchwood line should be an ideal candidate to reopen given the housing growth in that area and the difficult of traveling by car/bus to Southampton.
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 670


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: May 14, 2026, 19:44:04 »

The Cowley branch is set to reopen as a result of the multi-billion-pound EIT facility being developed at Oxford Science Park. The project is expected to create up to 7,000 jobs, and EIT has also helped fund the reopening.

Interestingly, the push for the scheme came from the Treasury rather than the Department for Transport. The DfT» (Department for Transport - about) had previously stated that there was no further funding available for rail improvements, so the announcement of the reopening came as a surprise to many industry observers. I suspect there was a conversation between Ellison and the Government regarding transport links to Oxford Science Park, given the scale of the investment being made there and whether those investments would continue.

But I agree that the line to Marchwood line should be an ideal candidate to reopen given the housing growth in that area and the difficult of traveling by car/bus to Southampton.

Doesn't this also help capacity issues at Oxford Station as EWR (East West Railway (Oxford to Bedford), or possibly East Worthing station, depending on context) services (when they finally run) can terminate at Cowley
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 14147


View Profile Email
« Reply #53 on: May 14, 2026, 20:00:30 »

Chiltern's Oxford services are currently slated to do  that, with another 2tph eventually shuttling between Hanborough & Cowley.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 14147


View Profile Email
« Reply #54 on: May 14, 2026, 21:26:33 »

EWR (East West Railway (Oxford to Bedford), or possibly East Worthing station, depending on context) services are likely to eventually go south towards Reading/Swindon but would require UP island platforms
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page