Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 15 Feb 2026
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 21/02/26 - Inspiration Train, Salisbury
21/02/26 - Romsey Signal Box Open
24/02/26 - Portishead RAG AGM
04/03/26 - Routmaster Auction

On this day
15th Feb (1917)
Initial journey - Jellicoe Express (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:48 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:25 Gatwick Airport to Reading
21:36 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
Short Run
19:19 Exeter St Davids to Barnstaple
19:36 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
19:54 Llanelli to London Paddington
20:17 Exeter St Davids to Barnstaple
20:36 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
etc
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
February 15, 2026, 20:28:16 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[241] Itchy feet - where have they taken me?
[82] A379 at Slapton Sands in south Devon - sea related incidents
[78] Mousehole, Cornwall: a bus route change (for the worse)
[56] Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR)
[30] Plus bus plus Rover
[14] Buying Tickets for Four Seniors
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Changes to Stranraer ferries and rail connections  (Read 5935 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 46342



View Profile WWW Email
« on: January 25, 2015, 05:10:58 »

An interesting proposal for a bi-mode train (but not a high speed one like the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project - replacement for HSTs.)) to run to Stranraer -

http://www.carricktoday.co.uk/news/local-headlines/last-ditch-plea-to-save-direct-glasgow-train-links-1-3667988

Quote
Last-ditch plea to save direct Glasgow train links

A crisis meeting is being sought in an 11th-hour effort to stop the effective ending of direct rail links with Glasgow after 138 years.

Elected members from Wigtownshire, South Ayrshire and SAYLSA, the line^s community rail partnership, are to ask for a meeting with the Scottish Government^s Transport Minister after plans by the Dutch firm to end direct links with Glasgow.

Since Abellio took over the Scotrail franchise last autumn, the three direct trains from Stranraer to Glasgow have come under threat.

Elected members also have ^discriminatory^ concerns about Glasgow-bound disabled passengers having to go via North Ayrshire to change trains for the city if the direct service is axed. By December 2017 Abellio wants to cut the three direct trains to the city, retaining only one late evening train going north and one going south.

[snip]

^However, I also recognise the concerns regarding the loss of two of the three direct services.^ Dr Mhairi McKenna, chair of SAYLSA, said: ^We have been lobbying for the retention of some through services at sensible times for some time now and we would like to thank Dumfries and Galloway councillors for listening to our requests. Both locals and visitors need a good level of direct trains and we are hopeful common sense will prevail.^

In the longer term the Partnership is seeking the commitment of the Scottish Government towards bi-mode (dual electric/diesel power) hybrid trains.

SAYLSA development manager Richard Carr said: ^France has had these trains for 10 years and for Stranraer they would be our preferred choice.^

The train pictured in the article looks like this one:



Taken by Eole99 ,  B 82500 Transilien ^ Provins , 26th December 2009, reproduced here under creative commons license (wikipedia) - see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:B82500_Provins5.JPG

And I can't help wondering if it's a bit wide and tall for the loading gauge?    We've been talking IPEMU (Independently Powered Electric Multiple Unit (train running on batteries)) (battery electric) recently - is there a good case for electric / diesel hybrids for more local use?   How expensive would they be if indeed this French design (or another) has been identified as fitting the loading gauge?
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 06:44:57 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Transport User Group, West Wiltshire Rail User Group Committee and TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7634


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2015, 10:45:33 »

The train pictured in the article looks like this one:



Taken by Eole99 ,  B 82500 Transilien ^  Provins , 26th December 2009, reproduced here under creative commons license (wikipedia) - see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:B82500_Provins5.JPG

And I can't help wondering if it's a bit wide and tall for the loading gauge?    We've been talking IPEMU (Independently Powered Electric Multiple Unit (train running on batteries)) (battery electric) recently - is there a good case for electric / diesel hybrids for more local use?   How expensive would they be if indeed this French design (or another) has been identified as fitting the loading gauge?

Beware of sub-editors bearing pictures lifted off the web and captions written without reading the article. The suggestion as reported is just to look at bimode trains in general - not a design that would indeed never run on that line. It's possibly too long as well - all the french ones are 4-car minimum. These days the makers can take one of their designs and all the on-board systems and make trains for Britain out of them. Subject, of course, to the space available for the big bits, and that is likely to be important for diesel engines.

But the question, really, is why do you need one rather than just running diesels? Possible reasons:
  • Performance on main lines, which are electrified, and lower speeds on branch/regional lines. (This applies to IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project - replacement for HSTs.).)
  • Regulations - a diktat says "no diesels from now in in our big shiny main-line stations".
  • Fuel saving - a genuine need to limit diesel burn to the minimum.
  • Emission control (again could be genuine or a more arbitrary regulation.)
  • Most reasons count for more if the off-wire distance is relatively short. (This also favours wiring it, of course.)
  • Most reasons also count for more for higher service levels.

I'm not sure why the French like them, but the fact that they came out of a programme for high-capacity TER rolling stock, and current ones are all 4-6 cars, does imply they don't bother with them on lightly-used lines. I imagine that's the issue for the Stranraer line - 60 miles of track for a few little trains a day must mean someone has to come up with lots of subsidy. Unless there is freight off the ferry, which I doubt.

PS: The ferries now use Cairnryan, but as they are mentioned in the article I guess passengers are - or could be - bussed the 5 miles to Stranraer. The railway doesn't go past there, so there are no options for a station or realistically for freight.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2015, 16:58:35 by stuving » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 46342



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2015, 13:34:42 »

The ferries now use Cairnryan, but as they are mentioned in the article I guess passengers are - or could be - bussed the 5 miles to Stranraer. The railway doesn't go past there, so there are no options for a station or realistically for freight.

In the past, Cairnryan was rail served (from Wikpedia):

Quote
During World War II (IndustryInsider - a respected member of this forum), Cairnryan became No.2 Military Port, and three harbour piers and a military railway, linking the village with nearby Stranraer, were built by the army. For a period after the war, continuing at least until 1958, the port was used to receive, by rail and Liberty/Victory ships, surplus/time-expired ammunition which was loaded onto army landing craft for disposal at sea. That coming by rail, had trucks labelled with the address, "Davy Jones' Locker, Cairnryan".

But now the transfer is from Ayr by bus / which according to some reports has become a minibus.

You're spot on with your comments about the dangers of stock photography, and the apparent issues with running bimode trains to Stranraer.  The line, with the ferry connection gone, becomes one of the more difficult cases around to run cost effectively (that's written with little local understanding of the area - I stand to be corrected) and the station use figures for Stranraer show either some really good marketing to keep the numbers up when the ferry left, or  ferry service that in practise took very few people arriving there by train even when it left from the Harbour station.

Annual journeys:
Stranraer around 45,000
Barrhill around 5,000
Girvan around 140,000 (some trains turn back there)
Maybole around 70,000
And so to Ayr.  Adding the above, making a small allowance for local traffic, you've got around 500,000 journeys a year on about 26 trains a day - something like 50 passengers per train, which ain't bad. Taking the section south from Girvan, 12 trains per day, you've got figures of around 23 passengers per train.  So three quarters of the passengers use the northern third of the line (measured in journey time) and only a quarter use the southern two thirds.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Transport User Group, West Wiltshire Rail User Group Committee and TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2015, 13:41:03 »

Classic Pareto principle.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 46342



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2016, 04:58:37 »

From Daiiy Record an Sunday Mail

Quote
A Dumfries man is demanding the re-opening of a Dumfries-Stranraer railway line.

Sandy Rogerson wants to see the 73-mile route brought back to life to improve trade links, boost tourism and reduce lorry traffic on the A75.

An online petition launched last week , gathered more than 500 signatures in three days and now has more than 800.

Sandy said: "It would increase public transport options, put Galloway back on the railway map, remove lorry traffic from the A75 and increase tourism in the region.

"The bus service is abysmal. It takes two and a half hours to travel to Stranraer, there are huge gaps between journeys and they don’t match up with the ferries or trains.

"The line should never have been closed."

The Paddy Line has been shut since the 1960s, when the Beeching axe fell on more than 2,000 rural lines.
Sandy, who works as a carer in Dumfries, plans to organise a public meeting in Castle Douglas to gather support for his campaign.

The 46-year-old added: "This would be a costly project and if you were just to think about that then it would be chucked right out of the window.

"But surely if the government considers the potential for tourists and transfer links, then it’s a different story.

"People said re-opening the Borders line was fantasy and look what happened there. Is it not time for Dumfries and Galloway to do the same?"

The petition can be found at: you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/reopen-the-dumfries-stranraer-railway .
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Transport User Group, West Wiltshire Rail User Group Committee and TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
caliwag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2016, 13:20:05 »

Erm...While we are on a Scottish theme, this from Peterhead...well an update...don't hold your breath

http://www.scottishconstructionnow.com/13770/councillors-defer-peterhead-expansion-decision-as-rail-plan-revealed/?
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 21332



View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2026, 00:15:03 »

I'm going to resurrect an old topic here, with an update from the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Plan to move Stranraer rail station away from old ferry terminal

[Image from here is not available to guests]
The new station would be brought closer to the town centre

Provisional plans have been unveiled for the potential development of a new railway station in Stranraer.

Network Rail wants to relocate the existing platform away from a former terminal on the East Pier which saw the last ferry leave nearly 15 years ago.

Architects have produced options for two sites - both of them closer to the town centre and linked to a new mobility hub. The project - which it is hoped could be delivered for under £5m - would be based on a new modular design concept to deliver a modern and visually-attractive building, and support local regeneration.

[Image from here is not available to guests]
The community has campaigned to move the station after the ferry terminal it served closed in 2011

The current station is located on a pier at Stranraer harbour. In 2011, the ferry terminal was relocated along the coast at Cairnryan leaving the facility "feeling remote from the town centre".

Since then, the community has campaigned to relocate the station closer to the heart of Stranraer - currently about 15 minutes' walk away. Among the key considerations for its replacement have been better connection to the town centre, an improved passenger experience and capacity to accommodate charter trains. The details of the plan are included in a Network Rail feasibility study.

Matthew Powell, the firm's head of sponsorship, outlined the proposals to the region's transport partnership, Swestrans. He said they were "keen to move quite quickly" with the latest plans.

Powell added that, having spoken to charter train operators, the distance from the station to the town was a major concern whereas a facility nearer the centre could "bring value" to the area. He added that they hoped it could be more than just a functional station.

(BBC article continues)

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 46342



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2026, 08:19:52 »

Stranraer, the service to it, passenger numbers are an interesting case.

https://www.passenger.chat/STR.html

I tend to make comparisons to places I know ... and Stranraer has about a half of the population of my home town of Melksham, and about half the passenger journeys per annum.   It does, however, differ, in that it's a the end of a line serving lots of other places along the way. 

We've seen similar in the past with buses from Bath to Easterton where the intermediate traffic from Bath has a business case, but the final Market Lavington to Easterton leg was a business case "joke" - however, and cut backs without alternative would have had a detrimental effect on both the places cut and crucially on the route as a whole, cutting off a chunk of custom that helped with the overall route economy.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Transport User Group, West Wiltshire Rail User Group Committee and TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2550


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2026, 17:56:02 »

A quality page on the last days of Stranraer as a ferry terminal.

Mark

https://www.niferry.co.uk/photo-feature-10-years-on-part-1-farewell-stranraer/
Logged
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1946


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: February 04, 2026, 18:54:15 »

A quality page on the last days of Stranraer as a ferry terminal.

Mark

https://www.niferry.co.uk/photo-feature-10-years-on-part-1-farewell-stranraer/
Very sad to see 'real' ferries laid-up and then gone.
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page