Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:35 01 May 2025
 
- Snake halts Japanese bullet trains after wrapping around power line
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1971)
Amtrak founded (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:57 Exmouth to Paignton
13:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
14:23 London Paddington to Oxford
14:25 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
14:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
14:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
14:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
15:03 Oxford to London Paddington
15:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
15:12 Westbury to Warminster
15:25 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
15:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
15:30 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
15:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
15:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
15:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
16:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
Short Run
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:32 Exeter Central to Okehampton
14:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
Delayed
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:51 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
14:06 London Paddington to Newbury
14:15 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:30 Banbury to Didcot Parkway
15:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
16:07 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
16:35 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
16:35 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 14:53:30 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[102] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[101] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[87] Cash payments for transport services
[84] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
[41] May Timetable Change
[40] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
  Print  
Author Topic: Dawlish - permanent resilience work - ongoing discussions  (Read 86014 times)
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5680



View Profile
« Reply #60 on: November 13, 2020, 18:39:04 »

Wouldn't some old pacer units have worked just as well ?? Tongue

No they are too flimsy, the first good wave would detach the bus body from the goods wagon frame.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
southwest
Guest
« Reply #61 on: November 14, 2020, 00:35:12 »

More delays..
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-54538258

It is not that difficult to engineer a gentle slope into the sea in front of the wall to ensure a sandy beach is still present. Sadly few people in the general public have much understanding of soft sediment coastal engineering!

That's not the entire issue, people don't want to lose the beach entirely(as was proposed), the old walkway and spray point would also be lost.  Local people have the right to speak up, they have to live there day in & day out and their opinions should be respected.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: November 21, 2020, 16:34:16 »

I notice from the Dawlish beach cam video that the inner wall opposite Marine Parade now has most of its artificial stone cladding fitted (on the railway side).  I do think it looks a lot better now, according to the planning application it was supposed to try and match the low wall on the pavement, as seen from Marine Parade. 

https://youtu.be/xsD21zBb73o

Paul
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: November 22, 2020, 10:31:59 »

That stone cladding appears to have been added in sections overnight during the course of the last week or so, from my observations (only via the webcam, I am in West Berks but have been to Dawlish a few times during the course of this year so know the layout of the new sea wall).

Would be nice if the other webcam (east of the Station) was online so that we could see the Waverider in action.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: November 22, 2020, 11:12:26 »

I reckon the other camera you?re thinking of is too far along, so it doesn?t *see* any of the work area. I think it?s the north side of Coastguards bridge, which is the limit of the phase 2 work area.

Paul
Logged
plymothian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 859


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: November 22, 2020, 19:16:48 »

That's right, the original camera (now known as San Remo) is further north from Dawlish station and faces towards Exeter, very close to where the line was washed away.

The newer cam (known as the Blenheim, as it's fixed on the Blenheim Hotel) is south of the station and faces towards Teignmouth.

The even newer cam (Brunel Holiday Park) overlooks Dawlish Warren station.

All are essentially fixed closed circuit television cameras and therefore cannot be moved unless they were unmounted and remounted in a new position.
Logged

Please be aware that only the first 4 words of this post will be platformed on this message board.
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: November 23, 2020, 08:53:19 »

Thanks for the responses.

Yes, it was the San Remo camera I was thinking of, but didn't realise that looks beyond where the next stage of the work is to be carried out.



Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 570



View Profile Email
« Reply #67 on: November 25, 2020, 08:51:26 »

Dawlish, Marine parade 179  trackside cladding by Robert, on Flickr

179 panels on the trackside at Marine Parade to provide the finishing touch.
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: December 09, 2020, 21:07:46 »

Was briefly in the area today so took a quick pic of the Wavewalker in it's current location right next to the down platform. As with lots of feats of engineering it's impressive to see close up, and big!
Logged
TonyN
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 517



View Profile
« Reply #69 on: December 09, 2020, 21:34:46 »

Wow I hope they have a good anchor. That thing being thrown against the station in a storm would result in the same sort of effect seen when one of the Lymington - Yarmouth ferries hit the pier at Lyminghton. The platform was pushed out of gauge at a train hit it.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #70 on: December 09, 2020, 21:48:37 »

Wow I hope they have a good anchor. That thing being thrown against the station in a storm would result in the same sort of effect seen when one of the Lymington - Yarmouth ferries hit the pier at Lyminghton. The platform was pushed out of gauge at a train hit it.
I?d be quite surprised if it used conventional anchors as well as having 8 legs extended into the beach. Once it?s raised up above the highest water level (and expected wave height) it shouldn?t be easily moved.

Paul
Logged
old original
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 912


View Profile
« Reply #71 on: December 15, 2020, 22:01:05 »

..and yet at the slightest hint of a bit of a blow, GWR (Great Western Railway), are now taking  the same position of XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)), and get scared of running a service.
Nothing running 05.30 - 08.30 Wednesday 16/12
Logged

8 Billion people on a wet rock - of course we're not happy
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6624


View Profile
« Reply #72 on: December 15, 2020, 22:12:23 »

..and yet at the slightest hint of a bit of a blow, GWR (Great Western Railway), are now taking  the same position of XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)), and get scared of running a service.
Nothing running 05.30 - 08.30 Wednesday 16/12

For more information on this:
https://www.gwr.com/travel-updates/live-network-updates/disruption-information
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5680



View Profile
« Reply #73 on: December 15, 2020, 23:54:24 »

..and yet at the slightest hint of a bit of a blow, GWR (Great Western Railway), are now taking  the same position of XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)), and get scared of running a service.
Nothing running 05.30 - 08.30 Wednesday 16/12


Did not my famous crystal ball predict that the new trains would fail to cope with the extreme, but well known conditions at Dawlish ? I based this prediction not on any detailed technical analysis, but on observation of Voyagers, and more generally that new trains often cope less well than older types in adverse conditions.
IET (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) advocates pointed out that coping with these conditions was "an essential requirement" of the new trains and suggested that I was being unduly negative.
Later, IET advocates, stated that the "essential requirement" WRT ('with regard to' ) to Dawlish conditions reffered only to not suffering cosmetic damage to finishes, and without any requirement that the trains actualy work in such conditions.

Progress !
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43946



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #74 on: December 16, 2020, 00:06:42 »

Did not my famous crystal ball predict ....

I suspect your Crystal Ball may have a rosy tinted view to help reflect your views.  All trains are stopped, including the castle class and 150s  which have been around since the last millenium.

Now - were you to suggest that the rules change under an ERMA from a franchise - so that there's now an emphasis on not damaging the trains with salt water in preference to not cancelling trains, I might think you had hit the nail on the head.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page