Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:55 24 Jan 2026
 
- Pier washes away and railway sea wall crumbles in storm
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 27/01/26 - Mark Hopwood YouTube interview
28/01/26 - Lansdown on the level walk
02/02/26 - CCIF Bids close
21/02/26 - Inspiration Train, Salisbury

On this day
25th Jan (2014)
FGW announces link with Singapore Airlines (link)

Train RunningCancelled
23:17 Paignton to Exeter St Davids
Short Run
17:45 Penzance to London Paddington
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 20:52 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
09:15 Paignton to Barnstaple
10:16 Paignton to Barnstaple
25/01/26 10:28 London Paddington to Paignton
11:16 Paignton to Barnstaple
12:12 Paignton to Barnstaple
25/01/26 12:28 London Paddington to Paignton
13:09 Paignton to Barnstaple
25/01/26 13:24 Okehampton to Paignton
14:16 Paignton to Barnstaple
25/01/26 14:24 Okehampton to Paignton
14:53 Paignton to London Paddington
25/01/26 15:23 Okehampton to Paignton
15:26 Paignton to Okehampton
15:32 Barnstaple to Paignton
16:17 Paignton to Barnstaple
16:30 Barnstaple to Paignton
16:54 Paignton to London Paddington
17:26 Paignton to Barnstaple
17:55 Paignton to Exmouth
17:58 Exmouth to Paignton
18:55 Paignton to Exmouth
18:59 Exmouth to Paignton
19:45 Paignton to Exmouth
19:59 Exmouth to Paignton
20:55 Paignton to Exmouth
20:59 Exmouth to Paignton
22:01 Paignton to Exmouth
22:40 Paignton to Exeter St Davids
26/01/26 06:55 Liskeard to Looe
26/01/26 07:33 Looe to Liskeard
26/01/26 08:16 Liskeard to Looe
26/01/26 09:02 Looe to Liskeard
26/01/26 09:37 Liskeard to Looe
26/01/26 10:09 Looe to Liskeard
26/01/26 10:48 Liskeard to Looe
26/01/26 11:18 Looe to Liskeard
26/01/26 11:54 Liskeard to Looe
26/01/26 12:26 Looe to Liskeard
26/01/26 12:57 Liskeard to Looe
26/01/26 13:29 Looe to Liskeard
26/01/26 13:58 Liskeard to Looe
26/01/26 14:34 Looe to Liskeard
26/01/26 15:15 Liskeard to Looe
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 25, 2026, 00:12:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[165] Dawlish - permanent resilience work - ongoing discussions
[53] Shocking behaviour by two walkers rescued from Scafell Pike - ...
[49] Box Tunnel portal at risk?
[49] WECA becomes WEMCA, sometime between December 2024 and January...
[46] Looe Branch Line - timetables, cancellations, engineering work...
[44] North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: no “safest spot” for passengers to ­minimise risk of Covid  (Read 1465 times)
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 832


View Profile
« on: August 01, 2022, 11:26:16 »

Daily Mirror
Logged
jamestheredengine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 307


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2022, 09:19:43 »

I'm rather of the view that the safest spot is in First Class. Fewer people surely means less risk.
Logged

[Image from here is not available to guests]
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1936


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2022, 10:26:48 »

I'm rather of the view that the safest spot is in First Class. Fewer people surely means less risk.
Unless it is declassified on a short form!
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
[Image from here is not available to guests]
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7619


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2022, 11:45:22 »


If you look at the Mirror's words, they say:
Quote
The researchers, having developed a mathematical model to help predict the risk of disease transmission in a train, found, in the absence of ­effective ventilation systems, the risk is the same along the entire length of the carriage.

So no real trains were harmed, or even used, in this work. And what is "effective ventilation"? Would "good enough to prevent pathogens spreading throughout a carriage" be a reasonable working definition?
Logged
Ralph Ayres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 476


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2022, 16:59:00 »

All a bit vague and unhelpful; perhaps the full report was better than the snippets the Mirror picked out.  The implied criticism of recirculating air is somewhat unfair as it makes perfect sense in energy terms rather than constantly trying to heat or cool new air from outside.  Analysis of any benefits of filtering the air while recirculating it might be interesting, and at the risk of kicking off a heated debate I note that wearing a high-quality mask to protect the wearer is suggested when at the height of the pandemic we were told that wearing a mask protected others not ourselves.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4562


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2022, 17:50:20 »

All a bit vague and unhelpful; perhaps the full report was better than the snippets the Mirror picked out.  The implied criticism of recirculating air is somewhat unfair as it makes perfect sense in energy terms rather than constantly trying to heat or cool new air from outside.  Analysis of any benefits of filtering the air while recirculating it might be interesting, and at the risk of kicking off a heated debate I note that wearing a high-quality mask to protect the wearer is suggested when at the height of the pandemic we were told that wearing a mask protected others not ourselves.

The gold standard is filtration and UV treatment of air, though UV treatment might be all that is necessary. 
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5806



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2022, 21:01:07 »

I have previously suggested the UV treatment of air to reduce the spread of infection, in trains and elsewhere.
Germicidal UV lamps are readily available and can be fitted to most types of air conditioning and ventilating equipment.
Any significant direct exposure of persons to the UV light should be avoided as it is dangerous to the eyes and skin.

Germicidal UV lamps may also be fitted to directly irradiate the interior of a railway carriage or other place, this will kill viruses and bacteria exposed to the UV. Care must be taken to ensure that no persons are present when doing this.

Decades ago, I had to replace large numbers of germicidal UV lamps in a hospital laundry, I was under strict instructions to destroy the used lamps by smashing them into a skip, to prevent improper re-use and danger.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page