Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 15 Jun 2026
 
- Man arrested for allegedly pushing woman in front of bus in 2017
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 20/06/26 - Hastings Diesel at Paignton ?
04/07/26 - Railfuture AGM
09/07/26 - Melksham TUG
29/07/26 - TransWilts AGM

On this day
15th Jun (2018)
GWR Community Rail conference at Swindon (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:17 Basingstoke to Reading
18:20 Falmouth Docks to Truro
18:30 Greenford to West Ealing
18:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
18:45 West Ealing to Greenford
19:00 Greenford to West Ealing
19:05 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
19:06 Truro to Falmouth Docks
19:15 West Ealing to Greenford
19:30 Greenford to West Ealing
19:41 Falmouth Docks to Par
19:45 West Ealing to Greenford
20:00 Greenford to West Ealing
20:15 West Ealing to Greenford
20:30 Greenford to West Ealing
22:21 Paignton to Exeter St Davids
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:27 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
15:49 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:47 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:40 Henley-On-Thames to Maidenhead
21:35 Penzance to Plymouth
Delayed
14:52 Newquay to London Paddington
15:48 London Paddington to Swansea
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:30 Plymouth to Penzance
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
June 15, 2026, 18:44:29 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[91] Richard Burningham MBE - retiring manager of the Devon & Cornw...
[74] GWR Evening Day Returns, Exeter area trial.
[72] A local return journey confirms the direction of local MTUG ca...
[65] Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing d...
[55] Electric Trains - Manchester to Sheffield, retired to the Neth...
[53] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
Author Topic: Railways Bill 2025: introducing and designing Great British Railways - general topic  (Read 23671 times)
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4659


I am a retired railway Electrification Engineer


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: May 26, 2026, 06:50:59 »

Is that list really the best they could come up with?

Only civil servants could manage to make it that dry..........I can almost imagine all the "working parties", consultations and Conferences that were necessary before arriving at it.............. Roll Eyes

I am still having trouble in London knowing my Sufragettes from my Windrushes though I suspect I'll get used to them in time - so perhaps I'm thankful at this current and (?) interim stage the names are recognisable to the previous operations.

Into the future, we may end up with operation divisions such as diesel trains and local bimodes based out of Bristol and Salisbury, under the heading "Wessex Trains",  local and regional trains based out of Exeter and Plymouth as "West Country Trains", diesel services based out of Reading, Oxford and Aylesbury as "Thames Valley Trains", etc ... and I would rather quasi -geographic names rather than "Brunel", "Trevithick", "Whitworth", "Beeching" and "Williams-Shapps".

There is logic behind the GBR (Great British Railways) names and it would not have been just the Civil Servants the rail industry will have had a large say:-
Firstly, initially it is about brining together 2 separate managements (TOC (Train Operating Company) and NR» (Network Rail - home page)) so a lot of systems are structured around the NR Regions / Routes and TOCs
Secondly and perhaps the most important the travelling public recognise many of the TOC names therefore maintaining a name link is seen a beneficial as it will reduce confusion.

Also there is a desire in maintaining a safe railway many of the current senior managers and Exec were junior staff at privatisation and saw at first hand what safety problems a "politically" driven change  for change sake brings.

Overtime once all operators are back in public ownership there will be a reshaping.

Interestingly missing Northern Ireland too.

But that is Ireland rather than Great Britain

[Image from here is not available to guests]

wikipedia/commons/4/40/British_Isles_Venn_Diagram-en/size]

Northern Ireland was never part of BR (British Rail(ways)), also it is already State owned and has been since 1967.

Scottish and Welsh TOC's have been in public ownership since 2022 and 2021 respectively under the control of their own devolved Governments

 
Logged

"The real source of danger, and the only one which there is any hope of removing, is in a complication of imperfections in a great number of the mechanical parts of the system"
Isambard Kingdom Brunel
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 14154


View Profile Email
« Reply #61 on: June 01, 2026, 21:15:27 »

Something in a conversation that Roger Ford was having on X/Twitter earlier caught my eye.

The major saving meant to emerge from the move to GBR (Great British Railways) is supposed to be the 2% or so in fees being paid to the operators for operating their management contracts.

However, unannounced, but contained within the Railways Bill, is the fact that the rolling stock, being hired by the operators from the ROSCOs» (ROlling Stock COmpany - about) - isn't going back to the ROSCOs to be directly hired by GBR - oh no - the stock is being sub-leased by the operators to DfT» (Department for Transport - about)/GBR.....probably charging them that 2% in admin charges to continue to do this!!

So no real savings either.....unbelievable Roll Eyes
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4659


I am a retired railway Electrification Engineer


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: June 02, 2026, 06:08:09 »

Something in a conversation that Roger Ford was having on X/Twitter earlier caught my eye.

The major saving meant to emerge from the move to GBR (Great British Railways) is supposed to be the 2% or so in fees being paid to the operators for operating their management contracts.

However, unannounced, but contained within the Railways Bill, is the fact that the rolling stock, being hired by the operators from the ROSCOs» (ROlling Stock COmpany - about) - isn't going back to the ROSCOs to be directly hired by GBR - oh no - the stock is being sub-leased by the operators to DfT» (Department for Transport - about)/GBR.....probably charging them that 2% in admin charges to continue to do this!!

So no real savings either.....unbelievable Roll Eyes

Possibly the way the rolling stock financing and leasing contracts were setup, and probably originally agreed by DfT, make it complex and or expensive to change the arrangement.   I would like to think GBR / DfT will be reviewing all these arrangement once the TOC (Train Operating Company) are under public ownership
Logged

"The real source of danger, and the only one which there is any hope of removing, is in a complication of imperfections in a great number of the mechanical parts of the system"
Isambard Kingdom Brunel
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page