Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 18 Apr 2026
 
* Strait of Hormuz closed again, Iran says, as ships attacked
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 09/05/26 - BRTA - Westbury
05/06/26 - EPF Annual Meeting
20/06/26 - Hastings Diesel at Paignton ?
09/07/26 - Melksham TUG

On this day
18th Apr (2018)
SEWWEB leaflet launched and Aztec West (link)

Train RunningDelayed
21:00 Cardiff Central to Exeter St Davids
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 18, 2026, 23:37:15 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[74] A personal update - a.k.a. why I have not checked the TVM at M...
[66] Rail fares heat map?
[65] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
[56] Health comparison - commute on foot, by cycle, by train, and b...
[53] Home and TV food in Wiltshire while travel is out of the quest...
[49] Hermitage-Hampstead Norreys Active Travel Route on DNS line
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 07:01 Worcester Shrub Hill to Oxford 11 May  (Read 5603 times)
charles_uk
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 860

thewalkingpage
View Profile
« on: May 11, 2023, 12:17:57 »

Realtime trains suggests a very unusual seven car train on today's 07:01 Worcester Shrub Hill to Oxford morning halts service. 2 x 2 car plus 1 x 3 car 165 units (165125, 165129 & 165106).

Presumably this was just to relocate the units and only one of the two car turbos would actually have been operational?
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 14066


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2023, 12:22:24 »

Need for refuelling?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 46765



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2023, 12:42:33 »

Need for refuelling?

Likely. Almost certainly not due to anticipated high passenger demand from Ascott-under-Wychwood
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Transport User Group, West Wiltshire Rail User Group Committee and TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 953



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2023, 12:47:59 »

It ran almost quarter of an hour late, too
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1365


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2023, 11:56:42 »

Need for refuelling?

Likely. Almost certainly not due to anticipated high passenger demand from Ascott-under-Wychwood

You could fit the entire population of Ascott-under-Wychwood (550) into that formation with 110 seats left empty...
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10665


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2023, 13:04:45 »

I think one of the sets was sent to Oxford to take another faulty one back to Reading via Worcester later that morning that couldn’t be driven on its own.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7648


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2023, 17:06:44 »

I think one of the sets was sent to Oxford to take another faulty one back to Reading via Worcester later that morning that couldn’t be driven on its own.

That was what I guessed, as the only vaguely logical reason the three-car unit would go on to Reading with another two-car in tow. Especially is it went back via ... Worcester.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page