Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:35 10 Jul 2026
 
- Man nearly sucked out of window mid-air on Ryanair plane, passengers say
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 29/07/26 - TransWilts AGM
01/08/26 - Avoncliff to Weymouth day out
12/08/26 - Solar eclipse
15/08/26 - Imber Bus Day

On this day
10th Jul (1967)
Marlow Station relocated (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:36 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:14 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:02 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
21:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Oxford
21:15 Great Malvern to Bristol Temple Meads
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:20 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
21:21 Bristol Parkway to Portsmouth & Southsea
21:26 Exmouth to Paignton
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
21:41 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
21:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
22:00 Hereford to London Paddington
22:01 Oxford to London Paddington
22:16 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:31 Swindon to Westbury
22:40 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
10/07/26 22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
23:14 London Paddington to Oxford
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
Short Run
17:05 London Paddington to Carmarthen
18:12 London Paddington to Swansea
19:16 London Paddington to Swansea
19:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:28 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
20:20 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
20:24 Exmouth to Cardiff Central
20:31 Paignton to Exmouth
20:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
10/07/26 22:30 London Paddington to Bedwyn
10/07/26 23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
17:50 Penzance to London Paddington
18:23 Swansea to London Paddington
18:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:15 Penzance to Plymouth
20:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:12 Westbury to Cardiff Central
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:15 Warminster to Portsmouth Harbour
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
July 10, 2026, 21:53:15 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] OTD: 9 July 1856 - Nikola Tesla born (except he is recorded as...
[75] Google maps live bus timings
[67] Stonehenge - Love it or hate it?
[44] Server slow ...
[41] Heritage railways crossing public highways - issues raised
[35] Jude Bellingham station to keep name until Monday
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR)  (Read 112454 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 14209


View Profile Email
« Reply #270 on: June 16, 2026, 08:51:14 »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0YO9ZzSpZA

First 175 into Paignton.

I did not use hyperlink. May work now.

Still nope.

Owner must have changed permissions as this now works for me
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712



View Profile Email
« Reply #271 on: June 18, 2026, 14:53:11 »

Another move from Wolverton cancelled today. Probably only wanted for spare parts. The Paignton training train only lasted two days.
14 trains and lucky if a third operational. If they had shown such patience with the 769s..Huh GWR (Great Western Railway) management must be demob happy. He who laughs last has found someone else to blame.
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712



View Profile Email
« Reply #272 on: June 23, 2026, 17:57:52 »

175004 to Exeter depot today.

Ely :3: 175005/008, 175104 (175008 is in two halves)

Wolverton :8 :  175102/103/105/106/107/108/109/110

Laira : 14: 175002/007/009, 175114 ex Ely; 175001/003/006/011, 175101/111/112/113/115/116 ex Wolverton

Exeter : 1 : 175004 ex Wolverton

Long Rock : 1 : 175010 ex Ely

as of 23 June 2026
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712



View Profile Email
« Reply #273 on: June 30, 2026, 08:52:31 »

Only 175001, 175009, 175114 seem to be in passenger service today and no training trains.

GWR (Great Western Railway) have 16 175s, two have been at Laira for 18 months.

Only one extra train has been provided since last December and no strengthening of services anywhere on GWR that the 175s were meant to bring by releasing the 158s to Bristol.

Will GBR (Great British Railways) keep the management on in December?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10752


View Profile
« Reply #274 on: June 30, 2026, 11:49:33 »

Will GBR (Great British Railways) keep the management on in December?

Why wouldn’t they?

I have sympathy for ‘the management’ as they have inherited an already unreliable fleet which needed much TLC (three letter code, or tender loving care, depending on context ) to offer up OK levels of reliability with TfW (Transport for Wales) and which was left to fester for a year or two in sidings.

A far worse decision from ‘the management’ would have been to chuck them out in service at a rate of knots, and watch them screw up the main line by failing on a daily basis.

Or another poor decision would have been to take the Class 175s over a much more reliable unit…but the 175s were all that was on offer.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712



View Profile Email
« Reply #275 on: June 30, 2026, 12:19:34 »

Will GBR (Great British Railways) keep the management on in December?

Why wouldn’t they?

I have sympathy for ‘the management’ as they have inherited an already unreliable fleet which needed much TLC (three letter code, or tender loving care, depending on context ) to offer up OK levels of reliability with TfW (Transport for Wales) and which was left to fester for a year or two in sidings.

A far worse decision from ‘the management’ would have been to chuck them out in service at a rate of knots, and watch them screw up the main line by failing on a daily basis.

Or another poor decision would have been to take the Class 175s over a much more reliable unit…but the 175s were all that was on offer.

And if GWR (Great Western Railway) had persevered with the 769s the turbos would have come west.
Logged
The Tall Controller
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 370


View Profile
« Reply #276 on: June 30, 2026, 12:30:12 »

Only 175001, 175009, 175114 seem to be in passenger service today and no training trains.

GWR (Great Western Railway) have 16 175s, two have been at Laira for 18 months.

Only one extra train has been provided since last December and no strengthening of services anywhere on GWR that the 175s were meant to bring by releasing the 158s to Bristol.

Will GBR (Great British Railways) keep the management on in December?

The 175s weren't meant to replace 158s just yet. So far, they've only released IETs (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) which have been put straight into use on the Bristol - Oxford services.

158s will only start to be released when the 175s begin on the Barnstaple services.

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 47220



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #277 on: June 30, 2026, 14:11:18 »

The 175s weren't meant to replace 158s just yet.


Two months short of two years this thread - feels a very long time
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Transport User Group, West Wiltshire Rail User Group Committee and TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712



View Profile Email
« Reply #278 on: June 30, 2026, 14:45:25 »

The 175s weren't meant to replace 158s just yet.


Two months short of two years this thread - feels a very long time
Which 175s have replaced IETs (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)). The over used 150s are covering 175s giving short forms on Paignton-Exmouth (2 today, 2 yesterday). Yesterday I train on Falmouth, shortform on St Ives and two 150s on Newquay.
Something is coming from Wolverton tomorrow to Exeter believed to be a 150. Last week 175004 arrived at Exeter and must be in the shed.

GWR (Great Western Railway) are not interested in the South West. They rebuilt  Exeter Depot with their own money but abandoned extending platform 2
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10752


View Profile
« Reply #279 on: June 30, 2026, 17:20:07 »

Will GBR (Great British Railways) keep the management on in December?

Why wouldn’t they?

I have sympathy for ‘the management’ as they have inherited an already unreliable fleet which needed much TLC (three letter code, or tender loving care, depending on context ) to offer up OK levels of reliability with TfW (Transport for Wales) and which was left to fester for a year or two in sidings.

A far worse decision from ‘the management’ would have been to chuck them out in service at a rate of knots, and watch them screw up the main line by failing on a daily basis.

Or another poor decision would have been to take the Class 175s over a much more reliable unit…but the 175s were all that was on offer.

And if GWR (Great Western Railway) had persevered with the 769s the turbos would have come west.

And they were told not to persevere with the 769s by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) to cut costs.

And had they persevered, they would probably have been less reliable than the 175s!

https://www.railbusinessuk.com/traction-rolling-stock/2022/12/23/gwr-fleet-to-shrink-further-as-it-abandons-class-769-introduction/
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712



View Profile Email
« Reply #280 on: July 01, 2026, 09:11:52 »

Will GBR (Great British Railways) keep the management on in December?

Why wouldn’t they?

I have sympathy for ‘the management’ as they have inherited an already unreliable fleet which needed much TLC (three letter code, or tender loving care, depending on context ) to offer up OK levels of reliability with TfW (Transport for Wales) and which was left to fester for a year or two in sidings.

A far worse decision from ‘the management’ would have been to chuck them out in service at a rate of knots, and watch them screw up the main line by failing on a daily basis.

Or another poor decision would have been to take the Class 175s over a much more reliable unit…but the 175s were all that was on offer.

And if GWR (Great Western Railway) had persevered with the 769s the turbos would have come west.

And they were told not to persevere with the 769s by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) to cut costs.

And had they persevered, they would probably have been less reliable than the 175s!

https://www.railbusinessuk.com/traction-rolling-stock/2022/12/23/gwr-fleet-to-shrink-further-as-it-abandons-class-769-introduction/
And stopped Alliance Rail using them this year.
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712



View Profile Email
« Reply #281 on: July 01, 2026, 09:18:36 »

Today Newquay 2 hour gap but looks like 175003 coming off training to take up the diagram. 175114, 175115, 175009, and a 150 working the HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) diagrams. Paignton had a one gap and a later short form probably to fill the missing train.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1991



View Profile
« Reply #282 on: July 01, 2026, 13:00:40 »

Quote
Will GBR (Great British Railways)▸ (Great British Railways) keep the management on in December?

One of the lessons of being a member of this forum for many years is that DfT» (Department for Transport - about) (and presumably, behind them, the Treasury) are the real decision makers, down to quite a low level of detail. It will be interesting to see how much latitude GBR will have to get on with managing things themselves. I expect that the high level of investment it requires will restrict its ability to do so.
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712



View Profile Email
« Reply #283 on: July 01, 2026, 21:16:16 »

175005 moved by road, unable to be dragged, to Wolverton reported on another site. Also half of 008 is at Wolverton

Ely :2: 175008 (half), 175104

Wolverton : 9 : 175005.  175102/103/105/106/107/108/109/110

Laira : 14: 175002/007/009, 175114 ex Ely; 175001/003/006/011, 175101/111/112/113/115/116 ex Wolverton

Exeter : 1 : 175004 ex Wolverton

Long Rock : 1 : 175010 ex Ely

as of 1 July 2026
« Last Edit: July 02, 2026, 10:32:42 by REVUpminster » Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9469



View Profile
« Reply #284 on: July 04, 2026, 16:09:00 »

Will GBR (Great British Railways) keep the management on in December?

Why wouldn’t they?

I have sympathy for ‘the management’ as they have inherited an already unreliable fleet which needed much TLC (three letter code, or tender loving care, depending on context ) to offer up OK levels of reliability with TfW (Transport for Wales) and which was left to fester for a year or two in sidings.

A far worse decision from ‘the management’ would have been to chuck them out in service at a rate of knots, and watch them screw up the main line by failing on a daily basis.

Or another poor decision would have been to take the Class 175s over a much more reliable unit…but the 175s were all that was on offer.

I'm not so sure.

I wonder if GWR (Great Western Railway) and their senior management presented their CVs for consideration, listing their "achievements" whilst at the controls, how would they stack up against (for example) a new team with fresher ideas and (for example) a more customer driven culture?

For sure they've had to deal with issues such as these ageing hand-me-downs, but if you look at the relative "newness" of much of the fleet (800 series, Electrostars etc) and all the opportunities they had to deal with historic issues when more was within their control, perhaps history may not be quite so forgiving.

Maybe, as with the onset of GBR, it's just time for a change all round.

No-one's irreplaceable, after all.

That said, other than a new colour scheme, I foresee very little (positive) change under GBR - I remember the excitement on these pages when it was first announced several years ago, and having asked the well informed people here at the time what real positive difference it would make to customers, I'm still waiting for an answer.............that's not a reflection on any forum members by the way, more on reality!

Perhaps the experience with the 175s are a metaphor for the future.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page