Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:35 08 Mar 2026
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 11/03/26 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM
12/03/26 - MelkshamTUG AGM
17/03/26 - RDM RIA Hackathon
18/03/26 - WWRUG, AGM

On this day
8th Mar (2007)
First "Where is this" picture quiz (link)

Train RunningShort Run
16:45 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 08, 2026, 16:52:32 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] Closure of the Somerset and Dorset Railway - 60 years on
[124] Early days of coffee shop
[56] Refund Rules for walk-up tickets are changing from April 1st
[49] Ticket Booking sites
[47] Looe Branch Line - timetables, cancellations, engineering work...
[32] Shortage of train crews on Great Western Railway - ongoing dis...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR)  (Read 72008 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19535



View Profile
« Reply #210 on: February 05, 2026, 21:39:14 »

172002 had brakes locked on at Liskeard. This fault a couple days after it had door interlock issues, also at Liskeard

Today the rescue unit sent wrong road from Plymouth was coupled up to 175002 and the brake problem transferred to the new unit. Roll Eyes

Subsequent major disruption in Cornwall.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 673



View Profile Email
« Reply #211 on: February 06, 2026, 21:39:41 »

The move from Wolverton to Laira was cancelled for the second time which has been the norm.

175002 and 175011 are parked up on the Looe branch until they fix the problem.
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 673



View Profile Email
« Reply #212 on: February 10, 2026, 20:54:38 »

Plan to remove the failed units tomorrow night.

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:53806/2026-02-11/detailed

Today has been a good day with 175001+175003 in tandem on training run to Newton Abbot-Penzance-Plymouth before 175001 made up the one passenger diagram to Penzance and back.

175009 also did a couple of training runs.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 46519



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #213 on: February 10, 2026, 21:38:54 »

Plan to remove the failed units tomorrow night.

8X75. - Maximum speed 33 m.p.h.   23:20 at Liskeard to 04:15 at Laira.  On skids?  Man walking in front with red flag?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Transport User Group, West Wiltshire Rail User Group Committee and TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7636


View Profile
« Reply #214 on: February 10, 2026, 22:24:10 »

Plan to remove the failed units tomorrow night.

8X75. - Maximum speed 33 m.p.h.   23:20 at Liskeard to 04:15 at Laira.  On skids?  Man walking in front with red flag?

That would be too fast for skates, wouldn't it? But it's actually a "feature" of RTT» (Real Time Trains - website)'s reporting of VSTP (Very Short Term Plan timetable - which comes into play during disruption / last minute changes) services: in the data the 33 is meant to be m/s but it hasn't been converted, which would give 75 mi/hr.
Logged
Hafren
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile
« Reply #215 on: February 11, 2026, 00:12:07 »

ANother forum is saying 5mph.... those timings certainly look painful!

I assume the '33' is some code in the timing load – looks like RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) can't match it against its list of timing load tokens, so it's misreading as a speed, perhaps. Similar to when the IET (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) timings first appeared - IIRC ('if I recall/remember/read correctly') the code for Class 800 DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) didn't make sense to RTT (or to whatever source it uses) so it parsed it as diesel loco with 800t trailing load.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 46519



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #216 on: February 11, 2026, 10:06:26 »

ANother forum is saying 5mph.... those timings certainly look painful!

Watch Journeycheck tomorrow morning - "this train has been delayed because of a slower train in front of it" for early services from Penzance to Plymouth.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Transport User Group, West Wiltshire Rail User Group Committee and TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7636


View Profile
« Reply #217 on: February 11, 2026, 11:41:05 »

ANother forum is saying 5mph.... those timings certainly look painful!

I assume the '33' is some code in the timing load – looks like RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) can't match it against its list of timing load tokens, so it's misreading as a speed, perhaps. Similar to when the IET (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) timings first appeared - IIRC ('if I recall/remember/read correctly') the code for Class 800 DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) didn't make sense to RTT (or to whatever source it uses) so it parsed it as diesel loco with 800t trailing load.

Pathing and planning speed are two separate parameters. Here, for example, is what RTT has for a goods working (not VSTP (Very Short Term Plan timetable - which comes into play during disruption / last minute changes)) which ran yesterday -
Quote
Pathed as Diesel locomotive, trailing load 600 tonnes
Planned for 60mph max

For most passenger stock at the moment the pathing information does not include a speed, that's implied by the class.

This is the text for the  planned recovery of the 175s tonight -
Quote
Pathed as Class 150/153/155/156 DMU
Planned for 33mph max

Obviously the scheduled timings were not derived from either the maximum speed for planning purposes or the pathing category!

That "33 mph" is common on RTT for VSTP (labelled VST) movements, for example this for a light loco running Bescot to Arpley yesterday -
Quote
Pathed as Diesel locomotive
Planned for 33mph max

The point, as I understand it, is that VSTPs are different. Everything else goes through standard processing to become part of the current timetable, at least at the start of each day. Details may be altered later (becoming VAR entries), but no new entries can be inserted into the timetable. VSTP items are provided separately so that they can be added to e.g. displayed outputs at a late stage in their production. The process that formats them for the industry data feed is separate from that for the main timetable.

So yes - that speed is provided in m/s, and should converted if required in mi/hr as 75. Other apps on line get it right, e.g. Liverail, or Live Train Times. The last divides the information differently, but for tonight's sick 175 movement includes:

Quote
Train Info
Operated By GWR (Great Western Railway)
Timed For 75mph
Power Type DMU
Timing Load Sprinter
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 673



View Profile Email
« Reply #218 on: February 11, 2026, 19:06:04 »

If they can separate the trains maybe 175011 can return faster?

This is a job for Saltash cams at 0208 if I can stay awake. Don't trust the timings.

175009 failed today out on the public run.

Recovering the trains was cancelled. Luckily I forgot and didn't stay up.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2026, 07:12:09 by REVUpminster » Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7636


View Profile
« Reply #219 on: February 12, 2026, 17:56:40 »

After all that, what an anti-climax!
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:V75372/2026-02-12/detailed

All sorted out in situ (by someone who knows about these things, apparently) and then scoot back to Plymouth in half an hour. Its buddy 011 was meant to follow an hour later (5Z15), but for some reason ... now what's happened there?
« Last Edit: February 12, 2026, 19:21:15 by stuving » Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 673



View Profile Email
« Reply #220 on: February 12, 2026, 18:21:56 »

After all that, what an anti-climax!
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:V75372/2026-02-12/detailed

Al sorted out in situ (by someone who knows about these things, apparently) and then scoot back to Plymouth in half an hour. Its buddy 011 was meant to follow an hour later (5Z15), but for some reason ... now what's happened there?
011 due to leave Liskeard as 5Z15 at 1945 using an existing path showing cancelled at the moment. It wasn't going to be sent via Penzance.

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:V75376/2026-02-12/detailed
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 673



View Profile Email
« Reply #221 on: February 13, 2026, 11:45:04 »

175011 is back at Laira somehow??
It is out an about and due to do the 1340 Plymouth - Penzance. I did a snip of the train at Saltash. It may not appear here.
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7636


View Profile
« Reply #222 on: February 13, 2026, 12:46:38 »

175011 is back at Laira somehow??
It is out an about and due to do the 1340 Plymouth - Penzance. I did a snip of the train at Saltash. It may not appear here.
[Image from here is not available to guests]

5Z13 shows 175011 allocated from Par, and RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) has reports of it from Par to (so far) St Germans. How it got to Par, and why it's not showing on Traksy, is another matter.

It has just popped up at Wivelscombe on Traksy. But how it's already got past Saltash on camera, I have no idea.
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 673



View Profile Email
« Reply #223 on: February 13, 2026, 14:58:19 »

175011 is back at Laira somehow??
It is out an about and due to do the 1340 Plymouth - Penzance. I did a snip of the train at Saltash. It may not appear here.
[Image from here is not available to guests]

5Z13 shows 175011 allocated from Par, and RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) has reports of it from Par to (so far) St Germans. How it got to Par, and why it's not showing on Traksy, is another matter.

It has just popped up at Wivelscombe on Traksy. But how it's already got past Saltash on camera, I have no idea.
I have a picture of 175011 using the snipping tool because you can turn the time back on the Saltash camera to 11.14 hrs. I just did it again to check.  I posted it on RailUK forums but it dosen't work here unless I put it on Flikr.

The 1340 was cancelled and only 175001 seems to be running round. GWR (Great Western Railway) service gone to pot.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9217



View Profile
« Reply #224 on: February 13, 2026, 15:30:35 »

Looks like the 175s are coming to Laira plus the two simulators. The 158s at Exeter to go to Bristol.


GWR (Great Western Railway) to get all the class 175s.  It be great to see them in service they are good units.

This hasn't aged very well.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page