Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:15 14 Feb 2025
 
- Avanti West Coast strikes suspended for talks
- Change Heathrow funding or third runway won't happen - businesses
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Special Bletchey to Bicester
20/02/25 - Integrated Transport Strategy
06/03/25 - Go-op Crowd Funding closes
13/03/25 - Community Rail Awards

On this day
14th Feb (2014)
Last train to call at Bicester TOWN

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
14:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
14:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
15:15 Penzance to Plymouth
17:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:56 Exmouth to Paignton
19:25 Exmouth to Paignton
19:44 Paignton to Exmouth
21:08 Paignton to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
13:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:35 London Paddington to Paignton
15:49 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
13:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
14:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
14:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
15:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
18:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
February 14, 2025, 15:18:53 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[195] Tickets Please !
[123] 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[91] First Bus and passenger space heating
[90] Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
[66] Incident at Trowbridge station
[32] "Old Worse and Worse"
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Vibrant or dangerous? Colourful roundabout redesign divides village in Berkshire  (Read 954 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19255



View Profile Email
« on: February 02, 2025, 21:23:54 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote


Horrendous and dangerous - or fresh and vibrant?

The California Cross junction in Finchampstead, Berkshire, has been described as both.

The product of a broader £5.5m seven-month revamp, the double roundabout and five crossings with distinctive leaf designs has divided opinion amongst locals, with 1,400 signing a petition calling for it to be gone.

Residents have raised concerns about the cost of the work, as well as the safety of a junction that doesn't exactly follow convention.

But how dangerous is it?

The junction consists of two roundabouts, each with three exits. Each exit has a crossing for pedestrians.

But instead of a zebra crossing with black and white stripes, there is a distinctive white leaf design - and instead of a roundabout with a standard central island, there's an array of rainbow leaves painted on the road.

The changes were made as part of a wider project for the area, which also included drainage works.

(article continues)


Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
AMLAG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 257


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2025, 22:09:44 »


What please is the relevance of this subject with regards to Rail / GWR (Great Western Railway) services/ this rail passengers discussion and rail information site ?
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19255



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2025, 22:16:20 »

I posted on our well-established board, at https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?board=31.0 , AMLAG, where 2212 posts in
295 topics have previously been posted.

I'm sorry if I seem a little terse.

Chris.  Embarrassed
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43329



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2025, 22:41:55 »

It *is* posted in the right place - "The West but not the West's trains" ... but .. it came up for me at https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/recent.html as I am testing stuff in the mobile friendly pages, and it flagged up to me that I haven't yet added the board name into that format.  Something added onto my list.

I've already been on that page adding today to add a list of who has liked pages and a like button (grotty format / operation as yet) and more to do on there, but too tired tonight!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2113


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2025, 08:43:49 »

It took the council's contractors a long time to do it. It has taken the media quite a long time to cotton on to it. Not sure it helps any road users, more than its previous incarnation.

Probably the only way you would get California cross (roads) and Nine Mile Ride into the national media. Not sure how you could "spruce up" the rest of the area.
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 866


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2025, 10:11:25 »

Statement Of The Bleedin' Obvious alert.

A Google Maps Street View image from May 2023 shows this location as having a perfectly functional mini-roundabout with pedestrian refuges arrangement. So to what extent are the residents of Finchampstead on the hook for whatever this completely unnecessary upgrade cost and which (council?) imbeciles signed this of as being in any way appropriate?
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2113


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2025, 11:03:58 »

A highway engineers take on it https://bsky.app/profile/rantyhighwayman.bsky.social/post/3lh74oakzkk25
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7388


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2025, 11:35:11 »

I have not paid a lot of attention to this, though it has appeared on the front page of the local papers often enough (notably last September with the headline "crossroads in national spotlight"). The council have put quite a lot about it on their web site, and not just in response to all this comment. From the start, they seem to have wanted to show they were not just roads managers. (Note this all goes back long before the Lib Dems took over the council in 2022).

The junction was a double mini-roundabout, and they never work very well because drivers have to attend to too many directions at once. With a lot of pedestrians as well, it has been seen as a problem for a long time. But development means more houses, more traffic, and some s106 money to throw at the problem.

Quote
The 25 March 2015 planning committee report states:

‘The main constraint along Nine Mile Ride is California Crossroads where currently there are intermittent peak hour delays, and increased delays would be expected. Mitigation alternatives have been examined and a Working Group has been set up with representatives from the local community, and this had its first meeting in late February. At the meeting, options were discussed, and it was agreed that the preferred approach would be a scheme that retained a similar level of highway capacity, and that the priority would be to deliver an environmental improvement in the centre of Finchampstead. An environmental improvement would facilitate the multi-modal use of the junction and improve its operation.  Over the coming months a scheme will evolve based on these principles to be funded by the developers, and it will be subject to wider engagement.’

From then on the language and logic have got more woolly. My objection to it is that for drivers who are not locals and come across it while at least half lost, having to cope with such an unfamiliar style of junction is an extra risk. Successful cooperation between drivers an pedestrians requires them to all know what's going on, and who is going to go where. I'm not convinced by the more recent idea that forcing drivers to work things out with no guidelines is safer in a case like this
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5340


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2025, 18:39:26 »

I think they should have used normal zebra crossing markings at all 5 positions, with the necessary approach signage. There seems no reason for drivers to give priority to pedestrians, so their safety has been seriously reduced.
Logged
PrestburyRoad
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 238


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 03, 2025, 23:02:29 »

I think they should have used normal zebra crossing markings at all 5 positions, with the necessary approach signage. There seems no reason for drivers to give priority to pedestrians, so their safety has been seriously reduced.

This was exactly the problem that occurred on the internal roads on the site at which I worked.  The architect had the idea that it would look more elegant to denote the pedestrian crossings by a shallow beige raised area across the road, rather than the usual black and white stripes.  The staff expected that only black and white stripes would mean a pedestrian crossing, because that was the marking they saw everywhere else.  Nobody died but there were many near misses.  Eventually management overruled the architect's idea and painted the stripes, and all was well - everybody then knew exactly what was meant and who had priority.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43329



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: February 04, 2025, 08:02:21 »

There are (or have been)  a number of other none-standard Zebra crossings around

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47402269

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-57630842

and I recall a curved zebra crossing on a corner - I think in Funchal - sure I took a picture but can't find it.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5478


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 04, 2025, 08:12:53 »

To be fair, the crossing by Castle Park in Bristol is signal-controlled - the area that’s been painted would normally just be plain highway - so it’s not particularly confusing.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 757


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2025, 05:54:09 »

Something similar at Chichester.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19255



View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: February 05, 2025, 09:04:13 »

Perhaps the Department for Transport should now update their guidance on roundabouts in the Highway Code.

Their current illustrations bear no resemblance to these increasingly artistic variations which are now springing up.  Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1758



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 05, 2025, 09:11:34 »

Quote
Perhaps the Department for Transport should now update their guidance on roundabouts in the Highway Code.

Their current illustrations bear no resemblance to these increasingly artistic variations which are now springing up.  Roll Eyes

Better still - update their guidance to prohibit non-standard road markings. Surely the whole idea of standard road markings is for safety, so that all road users know what the rules are, they can be taught as part of teaching children pedestrian road safety and safe cycling and learner drivers to drive.

I do not have a problem in principle with Dutch-style "home zones" where motorised traffic has to cede priority to others in the right places, but there needs to be clear and universal road signage and marking.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page