Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 28 Mar 2025
 
* WH Smith name to disappear from High Street after sale
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - WSB -> Llandrindod
15/04/25 - End, Rail Future consultation
15/04/25 - Everything Electric
16/04/25 - Walk from Chetnole

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:00 Oxford to London Paddington
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
16:07 Reading to Basingstoke
16:59 Basingstoke to Reading
17:15 Reading to Basingstoke
17:49 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:53 Basingstoke to Reading
18:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
12:12 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
12:25 Newbury to London Paddington
12:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
13:09 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
13:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:48 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:06 London Paddington to Newbury
14:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:15 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Delayed
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
10:59 Great Malvern to London Paddington
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
12:13 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:13 London Paddington to Newbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2025, 13:29:03 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[151] Thousands of jobs ‘could go as part of UK government’s rai...
[57] Coffee is back - now to work on the cream and sugar
[53] Paddington bear stolen from Newbury in Berkshire, now recovere...
[49] Monmouthshire and Brecon Canal - water shortage, March 2025
[46] WH Smith name to disappear from high street but retained at st...
[32] GWR Rewards fares - launching March 2025
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Petition for drivers to be "presumed liable" for cyclist collisions.  (Read 4500 times)
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 761


View Profile
« on: February 24, 2025, 09:42:46 »

"The government has been urged to introduce presumed liability for civil cases relating to certain road collisions, a move which would see motorists presumed liable when involved in incidents involving cyclists, pedestrians or horse riders."

Road C.C. article

I'm in an interesting situation in that I cycled more than quarter of a million miles and was a strong defender of cyclists. During that time I had a few bad experiences with motorists, usually down to their carelessness, though there were a couple of cases involving young yobs.

But on half-a-dozen occasions in recent years it's only been my alertness that has prevented me driving into an idiot cyclist. Had I done so, I would have had difficulty in proving that I was not at fault. (Some times I'd noticed a cyclist riding on the pavement, only for him to suddenly switch to the road in front of me,as I'd half anticipated.) And as a pedestrian I've had a dozen close encounters with pavement cyclists.

It's reassuring that some of the comments appended to the road.cc article are balanced and recognise that some cyclists are their own worst enemies.

I still regard cycles - and even "illegal" e-scooters - as an ideal way of getting around, provided they're used sensibly.
Logged
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2133


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2025, 11:20:39 »

The idea is not altogether new, it is already the case in some European countries.

And yes "some cyclists are their own worst enemies" as are some motorists, although the previous administration would not have liked to see it that way.

Much as we might hope it is unlikely to happen, to many votes in cars, and most elected members worship at the altar of the great god motorcar.
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 877


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2025, 18:31:39 »

Terrible idea which I hope will be consigned to the bin forthwith.

Where necessary liabilty for an RTC involving cyclists should be apportioned to the actual guilty party rather than on the basis of a preset assumption.

And in my experience - I cycle around 5000 miles a year - it is quite commonly other cyclists or pedestrians at fault.

 
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8580



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2025, 20:32:52 »

Only 4,500 signatures in over 3 months.......not much of an urge?
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6637


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2025, 19:31:51 »

Only 4,500 signatures in over 3 months.......not much of an urge?

Probably realism involved. There should be no presumption of anything entirely outside of the control of one of the parties involved.
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page