Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:55 24 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steamship Shieldhall / Soton
tomorrow - SWR Franchise expires
31/05/25 - Walk from Trowbridge
13/06/25 - EPF Conference, Swindon (TWSW)

On this day
24th May (2002)
Falkirk Wheel opens

Train RunningCancelled
21:25 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
25/05/25 00:18 Reading to Newbury
25/05/25 06:36 Reading to London Paddington
25/05/25 10:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
25/05/25 17:55 Penzance to London Paddington
Short Run
21:07 Exeter Central to Bristol Temple Meads
25/05/25 07:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
25/05/25 11:47 Exeter St Davids to Cardiff Central
25/05/25 12:45 London Paddington to Hereford
25/05/25 13:37 London Paddington to Carmarthen
25/05/25 14:18 Penzance to London Paddington
25/05/25 15:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
25/05/25 17:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
25/05/25 17:30 Hereford to London Paddington
25/05/25 17:45 London Paddington to Great Malvern
25/05/25 19:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
25/05/25 20:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
25/05/25 20:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
25/05/25 20:46 Great Malvern to London Paddington
25/05/25 20:58 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22:02 Exeter St Davids to Newton Abbot
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 24, 2025, 22:14:55 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[218] Train hits tractor and trailer on level crossing 22/05/2025.
[91] Interrail, summer 2025 - daily diary thread of our travels
[54] Broadgage unwell.
[44] Cotswold line fares - risen in practical terms far more than i...
[41] MPower Kernow CIC St Blazey
[25] Server slow ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Train hits tractor and trailer on level crossing 22/05/2025.  (Read 425 times)
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5688



View Profile
« on: May 22, 2025, 17:25:30 »

Several persons injured, though reported to be not life threatening.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly3885e58no
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5688



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 10:00:57 »

Later reports state that the driver of the tractor was arrested on suspicion "of endangering lives on the railway"
One person taken to hospital by air ambulance, and another by land ambulance, many others treated at the scene for minor injuries.
The train remained on the track and does not look badly damaged. Probably driveable under its own power, at very low speed to a depot for repairs.
The tractor looks still useable. the trailer is substantially destroyed
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 997



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 16:47:59 »

From Telegraph.



Logged
UstiImmigrunt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 143



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 18:48:33 »

Rant time.

A major problem at farm crossings all around the UK (United Kingdom). Too many farmers ignore the safety rules by either leaving gates open, not seeking permission to cross or not confirming afterwards that the gates are closed and the crossing is clear for a train to proceed. And if any livestock is killed on the track it's always the fault of the railway, not the impatient farmer who didn't close the gate(s).

Hopefully this farmer is convicted.

Rant over.

Thankfully very few injuries. The worse case scenario, one train derails and is struck by another train.
Logged

Retired and loving it!

Pround owner of a brand new little red book and an annual first class https://oneticket.cz/networkPassSearch

It will be well used and I doubt I'll ever get any delay repay compensation.
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3575

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 20:14:21 »

Later reports state that the driver of the tractor was arrested on suspicion "of endangering lives on the railway"
One person taken to hospital by air ambulance, and another by land ambulance, many others treated at the scene for minor injuries.
The train remained on the track and does not look badly damaged. Probably driveable under its own power, at very low speed to a depot for repairs.
The tractor looks still useable. the trailer is substantially destroyed

Nowhere does any report say the tractor driver is the arrested individual. In fact the reported age rules the tractor driver out.

Signaller maybe? Tractor driver called and was given clearance is being reported on a Facebook page I seen earlier today.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19325



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 23:53:57 »

Hopefully this farmer is convicted.

Bit presumptive that. Investigations need to be carried out, parties involved to be questioned, witness statements to be gathered. Rather too early to be blaming any one individual.
« Last Edit: Today at 10:01:32 by JayMac » Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
UstiImmigrunt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 143



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: Today at 09:23:12 »

Hopefully this farmer is convicted.

Bit presumptive that. Investigations need to carried out, parties involved to be questioned, witness statements to be gathered. Rather too early to blaming any one individual.

99.5% of crossing incidents are caused by the users. As per the rest of the comment I made.

There's no such thing as a dangerous crossing, its the dangerous idiots that use them.

PS There was a collision on that crossing in 2023, what's the betting it was the same idiot user? And failed to learn any lessons?

Once a few farmers are convicted for crossing misuse and insurance premiums go up maybe railway staff and passengers will be a lot safer.
Logged

Retired and loving it!

Pround owner of a brand new little red book and an annual first class https://oneticket.cz/networkPassSearch

It will be well used and I doubt I'll ever get any delay repay compensation.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 44111



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: Today at 10:32:46 »

Hopefully this farmer is convicted.

Bit presumptive that. Investigations need to carried out, parties involved to be questioned, witness statements to be gathered. Rather too early to blaming any one individual.

99.5% of crossing incidents are caused by the users. As per the rest of the comment I made.

There's no such thing as a dangerous crossing, its the dangerous idiots that use them.

PS There was a collision on that crossing in 2023, what's the betting it was the same idiot user? And failed to learn any lessons?

Once a few farmers are convicted for crossing misuse and insurance premiums go up maybe railway staff and passengers will be a lot safer.

Over the years, most reports here on the "Coffee shop" but not all of them have turned out to be the obvious ones - in the case of level crossing incidents mostly but not all the road / track user.  Should this turn out to be the fault of a crossing user who should have known better, I would agree with throwing the book at [him/her].  But until the responsibly is confirmed, we should hold fire on passing verdict and certainly on sentence. 
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3575

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #8 on: Today at 16:45:19 »

Hopefully this farmer is convicted.

Bit presumptive that. Investigations need to carried out, parties involved to be questioned, witness statements to be gathered. Rather too early to blaming any one individual.

99.5% of crossing incidents are caused by the users. As per the rest of the comment I made.

There's no such thing as a dangerous crossing, its the dangerous idiots that use them.

PS There was a collision on that crossing in 2023, what's the betting it was the same idiot user? And failed to learn any lessons?

Once a few farmers are convicted for crossing misuse and insurance premiums go up maybe railway staff and passengers will be a lot safer.

You need to be very careful with your defamation of the tractor driver, as it appears he gained authority in this instance, the tractor driver is not the arrested person.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
UstiImmigrunt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 143



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: Today at 18:13:42 »

Hopefully this farmer is convicted.

Bit presumptive that. Investigations need to carried out, parties involved to be questioned, witness statements to be gathered. Rather too early to blaming any one individual.

99.5% of crossing incidents are caused by the users. As per the rest of the comment I made.

There's no such thing as a dangerous crossing, its the dangerous idiots that use them.

PS There was a collision on that crossing in 2023, what's the betting it was the same idiot user? And failed to learn any lessons?

Once a few farmers are convicted for crossing misuse and insurance premiums go up maybe railway staff and passengers will be a lot safer.

You need to be very careful with your defamation of the tractor driver, as it appears he gained authority in this instance, the tractor driver is not the arrested person.

Which is why I said 99.5%. There was a nasty incident in Slovakia last year where a level crossing wasn't working after track maintenance. The treadles were left switched off so the red warning lights didn't activate or the barriers lower. Unfortunately several people were killed when a train struck a bus.

In this recent incident I know the CCIL, NR» (Network Rail - home page) incident log, has been locked so it cannot be generally viewed by NR staff. A previous comment on this thread mentions a information on NoFriendsBook.

We shall wait for the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) to say something.

And no doubt somewhere on the UK (United Kingdom) rail network today a locally operated crossing wasn't used correctly.
Logged

Retired and loving it!

Pround owner of a brand new little red book and an annual first class https://oneticket.cz/networkPassSearch

It will be well used and I doubt I'll ever get any delay repay compensation.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19325



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: Today at 18:44:33 »

When you can't be certain of something it's probably best not to double down.

Hoping a farmer is convicted, then the whataboutery from Slovakia... jeez.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page