Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 14 Jun 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/06/25 - Rail Live 2025
24/06/25 - GWR Community Rail Conf
26/06/25 - TWNW conference
05/07/25 - Railfuture AGM

No 'On This Day' events reported for 14th Jun

Train RunningCancelled
18:35 Westbury to Swindon
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:12 London Paddington to Swansea
19:44 Swindon to Westbury
20:48 London Paddington to Swansea
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
21:44 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
21:58 Paignton to Newton Abbot
22:31 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
15:28 Carmarthen to London Paddington
15:52 Bristol Parkway to Portsmouth Harbour
17:30 Carmarthen to London Paddington
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
19:22 Swansea to London Paddington
19:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Parkway
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:24 Exmouth to Paignton
22:18 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
Delayed
16:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:08 Gloucester to Weymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22:35 London Paddington to Reading
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22:52 London Paddington to Reading
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 23:41 London Paddington to Reading
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
June 14, 2025, 18:38:56 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[123] Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers
[97] Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
[90] Bus Service 205
[86] Best-loved railway art unveiled after global vote - June 2025
[62] RMT to ballot GWR Gateline staff over lone staffing plans - Ju...
[61] Rail trail proposals in Gloucestershire
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Tech arms race erupts in bid to beat fare-dodgers  (Read 240 times)
matth1j
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 151


View Profile
« on: Yesterday at 14:16:40 »

As you might expect, they're going to be using AI.

On the yahoo!tech site (it's a Telegraph article but you need to be a subscriber to read it in full there):
https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/articles/tech-arms-race-erupts-bid-075508560.html
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19682



View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 14:43:12 »

With acknowledgement to the Telegraph as my source, here is that article:

Quote
A technological arms race has broken out to combat the fare-dodging crisis plaguing Britain’s railways.

Faced with the prospect of £500m in lost ticket sales, rail operators are embracing artificial intelligence (AI) and so-called machine learning to crack down on freeloaders.

Evasion tactics that once went little further than hiding in a train lavatory to avoid the guard have changed radically since ticket barriers – first trialled on the Tube in 1964 – were introduced at major stations and across commuter networks.

Miscreants are often seen forcing their way through the barriers to avoid paying, a trend recently highlighted by Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, as he issued a call to arms. However, evasion tactics span well beyond brute force.

The digitisation of ticketing in particular, with the bulk of payments made by bank card, travel card or mobile phone, has opened up whole new avenues for fare abuse and forced operators to respond with tougher safeguards.

Transport for London (TfL» (Transport for London - about)), which puts its annual losses from fare-dodging at £130m, says that 4.7pc of Tube passengers – almost one in every 20 – skipped paying or stumped up the incorrect fare in the last financial year alone. Yet, across its wider network of the Tube, Overground, buses, Docklands Light Railway and Elizabeth Line, the rate of offending fell from 3.8pc to 3.4pc after fines were raised to £100. TfL aims to bring it down to 1.5pc by 2030 through an intelligence-led approach combined with new technologies and more proactive enforcement.

While offending in London is well short of New York’s 13pc evasion rate, Siwan Hayward, TfL’s director of security, says that fare-dodging “is not a victimless crime”. She says: “It robs Londoners of vital investment in a safe and reliable transport network. The overwhelming majority of customers pay the correct fare, and it’s unfair to those who do that a minority avoid paying.”

The main weapon in TfL’s armoury is its Irregular Travel Analysis Platform (ITAP), which uses ticketing and journey data, passenger information and CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele-Vision) to identify repeat offenders. The tool is integral for a TfL investigations team that seeks to identify “high-impact offenders”, some of whom cost the network up to thousands of pounds a year in lost revenue.

After studying data, the team liaises with 500 uniformed enforcement officers and plain-clothes inspectors, who can demand proof of a ticket or travel card while staging sting operations in stations, sometimes supported by the British Transport Police.

This crackdown led to TfL securing fines of £400,000 last year after prosecuting 360 of the most prolific offenders. Among the offences deployed by fare evaders are techniques known as zonal avoidance and re-tokenisation. The former, colloquially dubbed “doughnutting”, involves travel through zones that have not been paid for.

In re-tokenisation, or “card tumbling,” the fraudster deletes a virtual card from a digital wallet on a mobile device after a journey to prevent authorisation of the transaction overnight. The card is then reloaded, at which point it is allocated a new tokenised number, preventing it from being blacklisted.

A similar con involves the use of a bank card with insufficient funds to pay for a ticket. Tube gates identify the card as genuine and will let the holder in and out, only for the payment to bounce when requested.

One offender last year used a contactless card to avoid paying the correct fare on 202 journeys, resulting in £1,427 in fines. Other scams include the abuse of Freedom Passes, which offer free travel in London for the disabled and those aged 66 and over.

Meanwhile, outside of the biggest cities, at least 2,000 of Britain’s 2,500 or so stations still lack barriers. Therefore, bosses are required to rely on traditional checks to ensure passengers are paying.

Graham Sutherland, chief executive of FirstGroup, which runs express trains on the West Coast and Great Western main lines, said on-train ticket checks remained vital to prevent “revenue leakage”. But there is no doubt that technology has been a game-changer.

LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about), which runs trains between London King’s Cross and Edinburgh, has led the way among long-distance operators in deploying AI to uncover unusual ticket-purchase patterns and identify fraudsters, setting up a “machine learning team” to work alongside its risk experts. A pilot project that began in 2023 immediately identified a customer who had failed to pay for £10,000 worth of travel. Using information uncovered by the new technology, the team then built a case, which resulted in the customer repaying the full loss to LNER.

Paul Larder, at LNER, said the application of machine learning had been revolutionary. He said: “Previously, we’ve relied on our revenue protection team to identify customers who deliberately purchase incorrect tickets for travelling on our services. By using AI, we can accurately analyse large amounts of information quickly and identify patterns that our team can investigate further.”

While companies are ramping up efforts to catch offenders, a report from the Office of Rail and Road this month identified “significant inconsistency” in how operators target fare-dodgers, which has led to unnecessary and unfair prosecutions.

Lord Hendy, the rail minister, who put the cost of fare evasion in England outside London at £400m a year, said a planned new ticketing system as part of the nationalisation programme should reduce instances of people mistakenly buying the wrong tickets. However, for the thugs who push through – known as bumpers, jumpers and tailgaters – sturdier barriers are being created.

Developed by Cubic Transportation Systems, the barriers stretch from the floor to shoulder height and use AI-aided scanning software to detect instances of fare-dodging. Cubic says the gates “can accurately detect, record and flag fare evasion as it’s happening, distinguishing between different types of fare evasion, such as pushing through and climbing under the paddles or tailgating”.

Sir Sadiq Khan’s TfL has not yet said if it will order the equipment. However, if they do, they may finally offer some solace to law-abiding passengers confronted by petty criminals cheating the system while regular staff, who are forbidden from staging physical interventions, look on.


CfN.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1549


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: Today at 03:35:07 »

from what I recall there are 200 assaults on TfL» (Transport for London - about) staff per week and 100 are ticket related issues.

How much is the cost of 100 staff per week being assaulted and having time off work as opposed to the amount of fares being lost.

As a by line when using the London Underground,the amount of times I have seen passengers get right behind a fare paying passenger and go through right behind them.

 
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 44221



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: Today at 05:50:35 »

How much is the cost of 100 staff per week being assaulted and having time off work as opposed to the amount of fares being lost.

I'm not sure on the numbers ... but to let people evade fares because of the threat of them assaulting staff members would be a slippery and lawless slope indeed.

Not rocket science (and I'm sure it's being done) ...

1. Reduce fare evasion in the first place
* Remove loopholes in the system that make it easier to avoid paying the right fare in the first place
* Clarify the fare system so that it's very clear indeed what isn't allowed

2. Apprehend those who still and knowingly evade fares in a more secure way

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2179



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: Today at 07:21:04 »

* Remove loopholes in the system that make it easier to avoid paying the right fare in the first place

Split tickets cause all sorts of challenges. They may offer the traveller a cheaper journey, but they cause all sorts of challenges to the operators. I have heard stories of folk purchasing split tickets for their journey; showing the relevant part when asked to show their ticket; and then applying for a refund for the tickets not checked - and openly boasting about it! That is certainly a form of fare evasion.
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 891


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: Today at 08:26:10 »

Quote
.....Graham Sutherland, chief executive of FirstGroup, which runs express trains on the West Coast and Great Western main lines, said on-train ticket checks remained vital to prevent “revenue leakage”. .....

As I posted elsewhere on this forum SWTSMBO (She Who Thinks She Must Be Obeyed (affectionate term for wife or female partner)) and I recently travelled from DIG to PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains), via EXD» (Exeter St Davids - next trains), without having our tickets checked on either train. DIG is ungated and the IET (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) terminated at one of the ungated PAD platforms.

Mr. Sutherland appears, as they say, to be having a giraffe!
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8722



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: Today at 08:50:31 »

I am struck by watching "Fare Dodgers" that the BTP (British Transport Police) are often not around when needed to deal with regular/aggressive fare dodgers, tailgaters etc and as they don't have the power to detain them the RP (Revenue Protection, or Responsible Person, depending on context)/gateline staff have little option but to let them go despite frequently calling for their assistance.

Perhaps a more visible/rapid reaction presence to make arrests would be more of a deterrent?

Otherwise it tends to be the more compliant customers who have often made honest mistakes that tend to get punished.

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 44221



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: Today at 09:23:14 »

* Remove loopholes in the system that make it easier to avoid paying the right fare in the first place

Split tickets cause all sorts of challenges. They may offer the traveller a cheaper journey, but they cause all sorts of challenges to the operators. I have heard stories of folk purchasing split tickets for their journey; showing the relevant part when asked to show their ticket; and then applying for a refund for the tickets not checked - and openly boasting about it! That is certainly a form of fare evasion.

We had an interesting session yesterday about multi-leg air fares ... with the lady from Ryanair explaining some of the issues as far as attribution of income and responsibility when something goes wrong. Lively.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2029


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: Today at 09:52:10 »

I am struck by watching "Fare Dodgers" that the BTP (British Transport Police) are often not around when needed to deal with regular/aggressive fare dodgers, tailgaters etc and as they don't have the power to detain them the RP (Revenue Protection, or Responsible Person, depending on context)/gateline staff have little option but to let them go despite frequently calling for their assistance.

Perhaps a more visible/rapid reaction presence to make arrests would be more of a deterrent?

Otherwise it tends to be the more compliant customers who have often made honest mistakes that tend to get punished.


This put me in mind of the weird guy begging on the train up from Sutton to London Victoria the other year, going way beyond inappropriate and making every woman on the train feel insecure.

Gateline staff unable to do anything other than let him through at which point he worked his way round the concourse and then the Wetherspoons there. Their staff knew him well and put him out.

As we had half an hour connection time between trains we attempted to find security staff to help, one attended, interrupted him as he was successfully relieving a couple of encumbered international tourists of some cash, talked with him for some time, then, off he went and five minutes later he was continuing to work passengers on the other side of the station as we left for our connection.

Mark
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page