Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:55 08 Nov 2025
 
- Blame game over Air India crash goes on
- Thousands of US flights cancelled or delayed over government shutdown cuts
- Sixth Met officer sacked after BBC Panorama film
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 13/11/25 - North Somerset bus meeting
16/11/25 - Reading Bus Runabout
26/11/25 - WWRUG - GWR / Integration
28/11/25 - Bath consultation ends

On this day
8th Nov (1962)
Launch of Peel 50 and Moulton bicycle (*)

Train RunningCancelled
08:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
15:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
15:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
16:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
18:33 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
19:44 Swindon to Westbury
20:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Salisbury
22:35 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Short Run
08:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
08:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
13:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
14:33 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
20:33 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
07:33 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
14:35 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
November 08, 2025, 10:13:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[159] Tramways and light railways long gone
[57] No reservations on this service
[47] What happens if the alternate sprinter is up to hourly?
[44] North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
[41] Suggestions from Campaign for Better Transport for the budget
[38] Mid Cornwall Metro - Newquay, St Austell, Truro & Falmouth
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Court punishments short of prison to include driving bans  (Read 9875 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 45469



View Profile WWW Email
« on: August 24, 2025, 20:25:03 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
Courts imposing community sentences would have the power to hand out driving and travel bans under legislation expected to be introduced next month.

I heard this earlier - are they really suggesting that people who have committed crimes serious enough to deserve a formal punishment should be denied getting around with his own transport and pushed onto buses and trains.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13689


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2025, 20:49:58 »

Good punishment, eh?  Wink
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 45469



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2025, 20:51:56 »

Good punishment, eh?  Wink

Certainly helping with education to use more sustainable transport!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9029



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2025, 21:30:35 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
Courts imposing community sentences would have the power to hand out driving and travel bans under legislation expected to be introduced next month.

I heard this earlier - are they really suggesting that people who have committed crimes serious enough to deserve a formal punishment should be denied getting around with his own transport and pushed onto buses and trains.

In much the same way as those banned for drink driving are forced to use public transport?
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 20577



View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2025, 22:25:23 »

Radical suggestion: should they be required to staff a cafeteria, or sweep / litter pick the carpark, for a pre-determined unpaid number of hours, at a local facility ... such as Melksham station. Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5789



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2025, 23:01:32 »

Radical suggestion: should they be required to staff a cafeteria, or sweep / litter pick the carpark, for a pre-determined unpaid number of hours, at a local facility ... such as Melksham station. Roll Eyes

Not sure about staffing a cafeteria as such work gives many opportunities for petty thieving. Litter picking and simple cleaning sounds an excellent idea.
Also removing refuse from the lineside, when the line is closed in any case for engineering work or other reasons.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 45469



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2025, 03:59:33 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
Courts imposing community sentences would have the power to hand out driving and travel bans under legislation expected to be introduced next month.

I heard this earlier - are they really suggesting that people who have committed crimes serious enough to deserve a formal punishment should be denied getting around with his own transport and pushed onto buses and trains.

In much the same way as those banned for drink driving are forced to use public transport?

In much the same way, yes ... but you have a difference in scale.  At present, those who become "public transport only" and those who have transgressed on their own private transport.  The proposal is for those who have transgressed on a much much wider set of issues, and whose activities were serious enough to have lead to a custodial sentence.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 45469



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2025, 07:47:28 »

Radical suggestion: should they be required to staff a cafeteria, or sweep / litter pick the carpark, for a pre-determined unpaid number of hours, at a local facility ... such as Melksham station. Roll Eyes

Not sure about staffing a cafeteria as such work gives many opportunities for petty thieving. Litter picking and simple cleaning sounds an excellent idea.
Also removing refuse from the lineside, when the line is closed in any case for engineering work or other reasons.

I am - emphatically NOT - an expert at how people who have transgressed to the extent that they are sanctioned by the law should be handled.  I am aware of risks / concerns that there were at the local cafe in a place that's pretty isolated an quiet times where a single employed member of staff was looking after those who perhaps did not really want to be helping.  In my view such concerns would need to be robustly addressed in order to provide multiple objectives probably including punishment, rehabilitation, and catering, information, travel help, area maintainance and security services to the public.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 822


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2025, 07:52:39 »

It would affect people in different ways. Less of a problem for someone living in a conurbation with good public  transport, far more for anyone living in a village with two buses (if that) a day.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9029



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2025, 08:28:03 »

It would affect people in different ways. Less of a problem for someone living in a conurbation with good public  transport, far more for anyone living in a village with two buses (if that) a day.

Something for those living in areas with poor public transport considering committing a crime to factor in as a possible consequence?
Logged
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 822


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2025, 12:14:37 »

Do many criminals think that they're going to get caught? Statistics on arrests, convictions and meaningful sentencing could make reassuring reading for those considering a crime.
Logged
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 633


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2025, 18:12:02 »

Bearing in mind the number of people caught driving while disqualified I am sure this will be highly effective.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 45469



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2025, 20:36:04 »

The Times gives us this taster from behind a firewall

Quote
‘Epidemic’ of violence and sexual offences against women on trains

The number of violent crimes against women and girls rose by 5% in the year to March 31, while the number of sexual offences increased by 10%

It kinda suggests the care needed if jail sentences are replaced by "you cannot drive" orders.   Clearly, a lot detail is missing yet, but if things aren't done carefully ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5789



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: September 01, 2025, 23:22:48 »

Elsewhere on these forums, I spoken in favour of small, lightweight, and speed limited cars, known in France as VSPs.
In areas without suitable public transport, perhaps criminals should be restricted to such vehicles? To some usually young and male drivers, being restricted to 27 MPH and that in a small and lightweight vehicle would be almost as bad as a complete driving ban. It would however permit travel to work or education.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35210572
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 20577



View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: September 01, 2025, 23:35:23 »

Do many criminals think that they're going to get caught? Statistics on arrests, convictions and meaningful sentencing could make reassuring reading for those considering a crime.

Bearing in mind the number of people caught driving while disqualified I am sure this will be highly effective.

I rather think that's the weak link in your line of reasoning, broadgage.  Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page