Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 09 Oct 2026
 
- ​​USS Lincoln finally docks in San Diego after 10-month mission
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - TWSW General Meeting, Taunton
14/10/26 - Network Rail - Portishead
17/10/26 - Flying Scotsman - Wiltshire
24/10/26 - Industrial Heritage

On this day
9th Oct (1897)
First drive Lands End to John o-Groats (link)

Train RunningCancelled
09:08 Newbury to Bedwyn
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:26 Frome to Bristol Temple Meads
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
14:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
16:01 Westbury to Gloucester
16:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
Short Run
08:11 Gloucester to Frome
09:03 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
18:09 Gloucester to Westbury
Delayed
06:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
07:31 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
08:36 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
08:59 Reading to Basingstoke
09:08 Gloucester to Weymouth
•
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
•
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
•
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
•
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
• • Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple Meads • Bath Spa • Chippenham • Swindon • Didcot Parkway • Reading • London Paddington • Melksham
Exeter St Davids • Taunton • Westbury • Trowbridge • Bristol Parkway • Cardiff Central • Oxford • Cheltenham Spa • Testing!
October 09, 2026, 09:33:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[96] UK destinations you wished you'd visited sooner.
[83] 50th anniversary of the introduction of HST's on the route
[54] HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR) - Government proposals,...
[49] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[38] To 'stockpile food' is now our Government's official policy, a...
[30] Direct London trains from Shropshire 'could start in 2026'
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bike thefts at stations 'decriminalised'  (Read 4806 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 22620



View Profile Email
« on: October 02, 2025, 16:25:05 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
[Image from here is not available to guests]
Thousands of bikes are stolen every year from outside stations

The British Transport Police (BTP▸ (British Transport Police)) says it will not investigate bike thefts outside stations where the bicycle has been left for more than two hours.

It means most bike thefts will not be investigated and CCTV▸ (Closed Circuit TeleVision) footage will not be looked at outside a two-hour timeframe.

Commuters leave thousands of cycles on racks outside stations every day, including in specially built bike parks with CCTV. Critics say the BTP policy means those facilities are not secure and theft has effectively been decriminalised.

The BTP said: "The more time our officers spend reviewing CCTV... the less time they have available for patrolling railway stations and trains, investigating crimes which cause the most harm."

Simon Feldman has had one bike taken already from outside Watford Junction station and an attempt was made recently to steal another. He informed the BTP, which told him officers would not investigate the theft - which happened while he was on shift in London - as he had left the bike at the station for 10 hours.

"The BTP report came back after I reported it and it said they wouldn't investigate it. Even though it's right under a camera. And I found out that if you have left your bike for more than two hours, they won't investigate it," he said. "I was pretty shocked because what it's doing effectively is decriminalising bike theft and I realised how many people are being affected by this."

Mr Feldman said most secure parking was next to useless. "Lots of people across the country cycle to a station every day and their possessions aren't being looked after. They're not safe. Hundreds of thousands of pounds are being thrown into secure bike parking and it isn't secure," he said. "These cameras, you could put a bag over them and that would be exactly the same purpose they serve. The footage is never watched, the footage isn't monitored so the cameras don't do anything, so the thieves are so confident now they just take the bikes in broad daylight.

"The answer is a tough one. British Transport Police should look into these crimes but there are so few of them these days, maybe it's time British Transport Police said 'we can't do these any more' and hand it over to the local police."

In a list of crimes the BTP will not investigate, it also said thefts on trains should only be reported if the passenger knows the exact carriage.

Any bikes stolen worth less than £200 will not be investigated, neither will car thefts if the vehicle has been left for more than two hours.

[Image from here is not available to guests]
A breakdown from BTP of which crimes would not be investigated

Tom Fyans, from the London Cycling Campaign, said more enforcement was critical. "A lack of secure cycle parking at stations and next to no action against thieves leaves London way behind the Netherlands where nearly half of trips to stations are by bike," he said. "Many victims of theft in the capital just stop cycling - if we want to reduce car trips in London and encourage cycling we have to redouble enforcement against cycle theft."

A spokesperson for the British Transport Police said: "Whilst we know that bike thefts are upsetting, inconvenient and potentially costly, there can often be limited opportunity for investigation. Our experience tells us at an early stage that there are some crimes that are unlikely to ever be solved – such as those without a clear estimate of time or location for the incident or if there is a lack of CCTV or witnesses.

"The more time our officers spend reviewing CCTV footage for these offences, the less time they have available for patrolling railway stations and trains, investigating crimes which cause the most harm and providing a visible presence across the network.

"We will continue to apply a test of proportionality when determining investigation – looking at factors such as timeframes, witnesses, the availability of CCTV, the impact on the victim or whether there is a realistic prospect of a successful outcome. Any offence which is not investigated will still provide us with valuable intelligence, used to direct our patrols and operations."

Logged

William Huskisson MP▸ (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Ralph Ayres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 524


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2025, 18:25:34 »

Hmm. The reference to a timescale for looking at CCTV▸ (Closed Circuit TeleVision) makes some sense for (say) a pickpocketing incident, where you would have to watch the entire footage until the event happened. With a bike theft though it's much quicker to home in.  Assuming it's a digital recording rather than (surely not!) a physical tape you skip to the midpoint of the time between it being left and found stolen, then back to the middle of the first half if the bike was already gone or on to the middle of the second half if still there, then repeat the process until you've only got a few minutes to watch.  You can cut a 12 hour window down to a few minutes with half a dozen mouse clicks.  Sounds like someone has come up with a lazy blanket rule for all "minor" crimes.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 48031



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2025, 22:00:25 »

...  With a bike theft though it's much quicker to home in.  Assuming it's a digital recording rather than (surely not!) a physical tape you skip to the midpoint of the time between it being left and found stolen ...

Yes, presuming that the parked / moored bicycle was in view of the webcam.  One of our guests had a bike stolen (not from our place) but the webcam was capturing only the way in and out of the racks - not on all the racks themselves, and so a binary chop would not have worked.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Transport User Group, West Wiltshire Rail User Group Committee and TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 14414


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2025, 19:36:57 »

All station car parks should be losing their 'secure parking' accreditation pronto.

Quote
The BTP▸ (British Transport Police) said: "The more time our officers spend reviewing CCTV▸ (Closed Circuit TeleVision)... the less time they have available for patrolling railway stations and trains, investigating crimes which cause the most harm."

We have security guards patrolling trains & stations on Chiltern now - a lot faster to deploy when needed than the BTP & guaranteed to turn up as they are contracted solely to the train company. No wonder if BTP won't turn up in majority of cases.

It'll be interesting to see what happens to the BTP once GBR▸ (Great British Railways) is established as its the TOCs▸ (Train Operating Company) that currently pay for them. Once the cost passes to GBR/Government....they may as well be rolled into the national Police.

But until then, they can police the bleedin' football supporters on matchdays as that seems to be where a lot/most of their time is spent now.
Logged
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1055


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2025, 19:49:42 »

I think I have posted this on the forum before, but some years ago I had my bike badly vandalised in London (not at a station) and when I contacted the police, I was told they wouldn't look at any CCTV▸ (Closed Circuit TeleVision) unless I could specify within a 15 minute period when it happened (which I couldn't). However, I offered to view the CCTV myself for them (over a 2 hour period) but was told they certainly wouldn't allow me to do that, which was very disappointing.

Here in Bath many experienced cyclists know that the place with the highest incidence of bike theft is the tunnel that runs beneath Bath Spa station and has bike parking along the whole length of it. A couple of weeks ago I turned the corner into the tunnel (by foot) and was confronted with a bike thief cutting through a U lock with an angle grinder (not my bike). When he had completed this, I asked him if it was his bike  and he ran off, taking his mask off as he went to mingle in the crowds. As someone else offered to ensure the bike didn't go anywhere, I followed him around town for 10 minutes, which seemed to unnerve him a lot! (and allowed me to give a description to the police). The bike was safely taken to the bike shop next to the tunnel.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5933



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2025, 15:22:46 »

I found this video entertaining !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSzJKs2muDk
Would never be allowed in the UK▸ (United Kingdom) !
Poor little thieves could suffer mental trauma or even physical injury.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU▸ (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of page • Jump to Forum Home Page