Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 11 Jul 2026
 
* US wants Iran to pledge to stop shooting at ships in Strait of Hormuz
- See if you can spot an AI deepfake with our test
- Russia trains sights on schools, offices and buses in busy Ukrainian city
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 29/07/26 - TransWilts AGM
01/08/26 - Avoncliff to Weymouth day out
12/08/26 - Solar eclipse
15/08/26 - Imber Bus Day

On this day
11th Jul (1929)
Swindon Tramway closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
11:20 Newquay to London Paddington
12:19 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
12:50 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
14:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
14:07 Taunton to Cardiff Central
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:40 Paignton to Exmouth
14:47 Newquay to Par
14:58 Oxford to London Paddington
15:14 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:18 Paignton to Exmouth
15:19 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
15:23 London Paddington to Oxford
15:25 Exmouth to Paignton
15:30 Greenford to West Ealing
15:34 Maidenhead to Marlow
15:45 West Ealing to Greenford
15:47 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
15:50 Penzance to Plymouth
15:58 Cardiff Central to Taunton
15:59 Oxford to London Paddington
16:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:00 Marlow to Maidenhead
16:00 Greenford to West Ealing
16:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
16:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Oxford
16:22 Par to Newquay
16:23 London Paddington to Oxford
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:26 Exmouth to Paignton
16:38 Plymouth to Penzance
16:39 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
16:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
16:47 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
16:55 Exmouth to Paignton
16:58 Cardiff Central to Taunton
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:17 Paignton to Exmouth
17:23 London Paddington to Oxford
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:35 Swindon to Westbury
17:40 Newquay to Par
17:47 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:59 Oxford to London Paddington
18:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
18:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
18:18 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
18:19 Paignton to Exmouth
18:20 London Paddington to Oxford
18:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:34 Par to Newquay
18:35 Westbury to Swindon
18:50 Paignton to Exmouth
18:57 Oxford to London Paddington
18:57 Exmouth to Paignton
19:30 Penzance to Plymouth
19:38 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:38 Newquay to Par
19:42 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
19:44 Swindon to Westbury
19:59 Oxford to London Paddington
20:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
20:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
20:03 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
20:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
20:32 Par to Newquay
20:46 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
20:53 Paignton to Exmouth
21:07 Exeter Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21:24 Newquay to Plymouth
21:50 Plymouth to Exeter St Davids
22:25 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
22:50 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
23:06 Bristol Temple Meads to Frome
23:13 Exeter St Davids to Exmouth
23:28 London Paddington to Reading
23:50 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
23:52 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
Short Run
10:02 Pembroke Dock to London Paddington
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
14:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
14:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
14:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:55 Paignton to London Paddington
15:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
etc
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
July 11, 2026, 15:47:52 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[235] Shortage of train crews on Great Western Railway - ongoing dis...
[53] Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing d...
[49] North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026
[48] Google maps live bus timings
[46] Swindon Tramway, 1901 - 1929
[38] Ann Widdecombe RIP - moved topic
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Level crossing waiting times  (Read 1866 times)
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1055


View Profile Email
« on: May 19, 2026, 15:39:39 »

I have had to wait a fair while at several level crossings over the years, but taking a trip to London this weekend with my folding bike I found one that beat them all. I took a train to Mortlake and then had to cycle south, crossing the level crossing, and later had to return that way (though not to catch the train). Sadly I didn't actually time my waits, but I'm sure the wait from exiting the station was well in excess of ten minutes, and 5 trains crossed during that period. When I returned a few hours later. as I cycled along Mortlake High Street there was a long queue of vehicles waiting, and I thought to myself "That's good, I won't have to wait that long this time." How wrong I was. The wait was at least as long as the wait in the morning, and several of the people waiting around me were getting extremely frustrated judging by their calls on their phones they were having. There seemed to be a gap of well over 5 minutes (it felt like about ten) when no train passed by, and people just couldn't understand why the crossing didn't open.

Yes this crossing, and others I have had to wait at for several minutes, had footbridges alongside, but they are always very steeply graded steps, of no use at all to those with mobility issues or heavy luggage or cannot manage their bike and luggage up steps that steep. On the return journey, I noticed that several pedestrians and some cyclists, who had been waiting longer than me, eventually gave up waiting and tried the footbridge route, not all with success.

So I wondered which crossings people have found themselves having to wait for the longest times. Before this experience, my longest have been when visiting Lincoln, and using the crossing immediately west of the station. I also travel to Shoreham-by-Sea a lot and that can involve long waits at the crossing next to the station, though on average it isn't usually too bad.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7705


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2026, 18:48:59 »

When was this? The communications failure at around midday affected not just GSM-R (Global System for Mobile communications - Railway. A simple mobile phone that has been fitted to the turbos to allow them to operate on lines that are not covered by the cab secure radio (CSR). This allows the Network Rail control centre to send simple STOP messages to the driver or the driver to contact the controller in emergency only. When this system is in operation a guard must be provided when in passenger operation.), but phones and even signalling for a short period. Most SWR» (South Western Railway - about) trains stopped where they were for 30 minutes and then started up, not all immediately, and were not in their paths for some time.

Mortlake  is a busy crossing (about 14 tph (trains per hour)) and the timetable tries to have trains arrive in clusters, leaving several gaps of over 5 minutes in each hour. But opening the barriers depends that gap in the trains happening, and on knowing in advance that it will. I imagine that was difficult today.
Logged
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1055


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2026, 10:00:06 »

When was this? The communications failure at around midday affected not just GSM-R (Global System for Mobile communications - Railway. A simple mobile phone that has been fitted to the turbos to allow them to operate on lines that are not covered by the cab secure radio (CSR). This allows the Network Rail control centre to send simple STOP messages to the driver or the driver to contact the controller in emergency only. When this system is in operation a guard must be provided when in passenger operation.), but phones and even signalling for a short period. Most SWR» (South Western Railway - about) trains stopped where they were for 30 minutes and then started up, not all immediately, and were not in their paths for some time.

Mortlake  is a busy crossing (about 14 tph (trains per hour)) and the timetable tries to have trains arrive in clusters, leaving several gaps of over 5 minutes in each hour. But opening the barriers depends that gap in the trains happening, and on knowing in advance that it will. I imagine that was difficult today.

Both were on Saturday afternoon, probably about 2.30pm and then about 4.30pm.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7705


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2026, 11:15:14 »

Both were on Saturday afternoon, probably about 2.30pm and then about 4.30pm.

In that case I got the wrong day - if anything the trains were running too regularly. There are 12 tph (trains per hour), and if they arrive spaced close to 5 minutes apart there are none of the longer gaps. On that Saturday there were several trains a minute or two early or late and that's all it takes. The other factor is the personal style of the operator - some are more inclined to whip the barriers up whenever possible, others more cautious.

I'm not sure where the operators sit for that one, and whether they are crossings-only operators or signallers. It was quite noticeable when Wokingham went over from local operation by the signaller to specialsed operators at Basingstoke ROC (Rail Operating Centre - a centralised location for railway signalling and train control operations for a specific route or region) that the barriers were raised much sooner after a train had passed.
Logged
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 989



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2026, 12:12:28 »

Barriers (well, certainly most of them) that are locally or CCTV (Closed Circuit TeleVision) supervised in track-circuited areas are default-set to auto raise as soon as the circuit over the level crossing goes clear.  Obviously that doesn't happen if the barriers are down for a train passing over the crossing on another line

Some crossing keepers/signalmen used to switch off this setting so that their action would initiate the raising of the barriers.  They were either bloody minded antagonistic people, or they had too much time on their hands
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1006


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2026, 08:06:25 »

A related question.

On my cycle wanderings I regularly use the Stoke Canon Level Crossing. The crossing is CCTV (Closed Circuit TeleVision)-equipped and has split full width barriers.

On a number of occasions the barriers have been closed for up to 8 minutes - yes, I have timed it - for the passing of 3 services.

This is not, I think, what you would call an intensively worked section of line. Is this entirely down to the local signalling configuration (long track sections) or decisions made by the signallers (who I believe are based at the Exeter Box)?
Logged
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 989



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2026, 11:01:05 »

A related question.

On my cycle wanderings I regularly use the Stoke Canon Level Crossing. The crossing is CCTV (Closed Circuit TeleVision)-equipped and has split full width barriers.

On a number of occasions the barriers have been closed for up to 8 minutes - yes, I have timed it - for the passing of 3 services.

This is not, I think, what you would call an intensively worked section of line. Is this entirely down to the local signalling configuration (long track sections) or decisions made by the signallers (who I believe are based at the Exeter Box)?

If you have Train 1 on the Down Main, Train 2 on the Up Main, and Train 3 on the Down:

Barriers dropped, say two minutes before Train 1 arrives at the crossing, so the driver gets greens on the approach.  The first signal that could give a yellow could be 1,800m or so in rear of the crossing, and you don't want the driver to see that as yellow as the train approaches, you want the driver to see a green. At a line speed of 80mph, say, you really do need to start those barriers dropping two minutes before the train gets there.  There will probably be an annunciator in the signalbox, to give awareness that the train is approaching, at a certain distance in rear of the crossing - a track circuit or a treadle

Say it's 2 minutes 20 seconds before Train 1 has cleared the crossing.  By which time, Train 2 could be within three minutes of arrival.  You wont lift the barriers to drop them again in less than a minute.  So they stay down.

Train 2 clears the crossing 5 minutes 40 seconds after the barriers were dropped.  And now Train 3 is about, following  maybe four minutes behind Train 1 on the Down, and not much more than three minutes from the crossing.  Again, you don't want to lift the barriers.  Train 3 arrives at the crossing 8 minutes or more after the barriers were first dropped

This is a general explanation, not specific to Stoke Canon Crossing. It works for two-aspect signals.   But it does give you an idea of why you'd have to wait there for a while, sometimes.  With three aspect signals, when you wouldn't want to show the driver a double yellow even further in rear of the crossing, the barriers may need to be dropped earlier.  Just admire the Saxby and Farmer built signalbox.  A listed building, I believe, and disused for around 40 years now
Logged
John D
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 356


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2026, 17:45:32 »

When I used to live Kingston -Richmond borders occasionally used the level crossing by Sheen station.    Have waited for 5 trains to pass.

Get a bit of late running and mix of stopper on Kingston loop, faster trains to Windsor or Reading trains can be just 2-4 minutes apart, get a train going other way between them and just insufficient time to put barriers up.

Before SWR» (South Western Railway - about) thinned the timetable 6 years ago (and never fully restored it post covid), barriers could be down for around 35-40 minutes each hour in the peak
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page