Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 05:55 21 Jul 2026
 
- US launches fresh strikes on Iran, as Trump warns of retaliation for deaths of soldiers
- At least 27 dead and 83 missing after passenger ferry capsizes off Guyana
- Watch: Spain World Cup champions receive royal welcome in Madrid
- Craft and keyboard: The trainees mastering tech and age-old skills
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 29/07/26 - TransWilts AGM
01/08/26 - Avoncliff to Weymouth day out
12/08/26 - Solar eclipse
15/08/26 - Imber Bus Day

On this day
21st Jul (1904)
Trans Siberian Railway Completed (*)

Train RunningShort Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
Delayed
04:50 Fratton to Bristol Temple Meads
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
July 21, 2026, 05:56:35 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[112] Interrail trip 4 - the Home to Harwich to Hook experience
[56] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[50] Call for volunteers - 18th July 2026 - Walkers for Melksham Ca...
[49] Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR)
[46] Memories of schooldays, and what inspired us
[34] Stonehenge - Love it or hate it?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Ministers want 60% of children walking or cycling to school by 2035  (Read 1985 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 22175



View Profile Email
« on: June 12, 2026, 21:01:50 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Ministers want 60% of children walking or cycling to school by 2035

At least 60% of children in England should be walking or cycling to school within a decade under the government's new active travel plans.

Ministers say millions more five-to-16-year-olds will be able to travel by foot or bike using thousands of safer routes promised under its "record" £4.5bn investment strategy.

At least half of all short trips in towns and cities should also be walked, wheeled or cycled by 2035 and a "national walking and cycling network" will be available on route mapping apps within five years, under the plans.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the strategy sought to make active travel "a practical choice for millions more journeys".

The latest government data, from 2023, suggested that 47% of children aged five to 16 usually walk or cycle to school.

Some 5,000 walking, wheeling and cycling routes and 10,000 "safer" crossings will be built by 2030 to meet the new target, the Department for Transport (DfT» (Department for Transport - about)) said, which will be delivered alongside local authorities and Active Travel England.

There will be £135m spent on programmes training children to walk and cycle safely to school, and to help schools develop travel plans - although it is already commonplace that they encourage pupils to avoid car journeys.

Ministers also want 55% of short trips to be active by 2035 - including what is described as a "stage" of a journey, such as walking or cycling to onward public transport. The current level is 48%, according to the DfT.

The increase would mean 5.3m more people being physically active in towns and cities, ministers say.

The strategy also sets out plans to develop a national active travel network that is "usable at a national scale", including consistent signage and availability online alongside the road network.

The Walk Wheel Cycle Trust, which promotes active travel, welcomed the "ambitious" new schools target, "that rightly includes secondary school pupils and explicitly recognises cycling".

"This represents a significant step forward in creating lasting benefits for children and young people," policy chief Rachel White said.

The Cycle to Work Alliance said safe infrastructure and affordable access to such travel routes were needed to change behaviour, "and this strategy is an important step towards delivering both".

Charity Living Streets described the plans as "bigger and braver" than previous strategies.

The announcement "recognises the power walking and wheeling holds to improve public health, boost local economies and bring communities together," the group's chief executive, Catherine Woodhead, added.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: "Too many people would like to walk, wheel or cycle more often but don't feel they have safe and convenient options to do so."

"This is about creating healthier communities, helping households keep more money in their pockets and building a transport network that works better for everyone."

Health Secretary James Murray said the plan would "help more people build exercise into their everyday lives, improving public health and supporting our ambition to reduce pressure on the NHS".

Transport is largely devolved in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, meaning the plan does not apply to these parts of the UK (United Kingdom).

The previous Welsh Labour government had said 45% of journeys should be by "sustainable modes" by 2040, with active school travel playing a key part - though a Senedd committee warned in December that progress towards that figure had been "painfully slow".

Northern Ireland had set a target for 20% of all journeys shorter than one mile (1.6km) be cycled by 2025 and, under its 2022 Climate Change Act, committed to spending 10% of its transport budget on active travel. Its national audit office warned in September that neither target appeared to have been met.

Scotland is aiming for walking and cycling to be the most popular choice for short journeys by 2030. Government data suggests levels have stayed roughly the same since 2012, at 1-2% for cycling and around 50% for walking respectively.

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9490



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2026, 21:57:56 »

Why not aim higher?

I'd say it was closer to 80% in my day.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 47279



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2026, 06:22:12 »

Why not aim higher?

I'd say it was closer to 80% in my day.

As I understand it, there I much more freedom to choose your child's school these days and so the travel distances have gone up, and walking and cycling may be practical for less.  I was, perhaps, unusual but not unique in travelling by train to school - Petts Wood to Sydenham Hill and then to Sevenoaks, totally beyond walking distance - but walking to and from the stations.  On rare occasions, I cycled to Sevenoaks but even in those days the roads were far from cycle friendly.   I have vague recollections of there being Mum's or Dad's taxis  used for some at both schools, but as I used other entrances, I have no idea of volume.

Just on Thursday afternoon, I saw the 555 bus arrive at the top of our street and drop off half a dozen school children from Corsham.  This is a double deck school service and I understand it is very fully loaded - to the extent that there is no encouragement to market it further though general public may use it if they wish.  Other buses and coaches pick up from Melksham Market Place and it's educational to see the volumes picked up there on a school day for various other towns on both early service buses and special school runs.

Quote
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: "Too many people would like to walk, wheel or cycle more often but don't feel they have safe and convenient options to do so."

"This is about creating healthier communities, helping households keep more money in their pockets and building a transport network that works better for everyone."

Dead right.  It needs to be safe and practical. Our local secondary school has recently had a "new" path opened from the new build estates to the school, at massive expense (many consider it over-engineered) and that save a long walk around 3 sides of a square, including o a shared cycle and walking path on the side of the A365 which is really far too narrow for the traffic it was taking.  Interesting, I write "new" - there has been a public footpath across the fields since before the school was located there, but it was rarely used by any school child; I can recall just one occasion when out walking the dog, mid-winter - seeing a boy using it, and stepping in and through the mud getting his shoes and trousers covered.   

Drop off time may be an issue; pick up time is worse with all the parents arriving early to be there and close to save the little darlings having to walk too far.  Car parking is inadequate for pickup, and unrestricted roads close to the school become linear car parks for a while. 

The primary school which is about half a mile from our home (and was in my ward when I was a Town Councillor) has a serious issue.  It's on a residential cut-de-sac off the main road into / out of town - loads of "no parking" bollards and there is - now - a new pelican crossing over the main road, so that people park in the housing opposite with the residents there less than thrilled.  Talk of yellow lines, work being done on getting more children to walk, etc.   The pub on the corner which has a large car park and the school community don't get on - I don't know the history in detail - but there's a chain across at school times and a large virtually empty tarmac area that should really be dual-use IMHO ('in my humble opinion').

Other primary schools, such as the newer one in the East of Melksham estates, have similar problems with not only healthy getting to school but safety with all those cars and frustration from the residents (who knew the school was / would be there when they bought / rented).    I recall an approach from one of the school teachers looking to introduce her class to bus use and asking me where she could take them. But the nearest and only practical bus stop only has services at 10:15 and 12:15 and they only go to the Town Centre - there are 3 return services in the afternoon that *will* go round past that stop if there are passengers on board to be dropped off.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Transport User Group, West Wiltshire Rail User Group Committee and TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9490



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2026, 08:47:00 »

The latest available data has 50% of children being driven to school - that's a 23% increase over 20 years ago.

Probably no coincidence that children are getting much fatter too - 1 in 5 10 year olds are obese, that's frankly terrifying for future health.
Logged
John D
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 365


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2026, 09:55:04 »

Why not aim higher?

I'd say it was closer to 80% in my day.

As I understand it, there I much more freedom to choose your child's school these days and so the travel distances have gone up, and walking and cycling may be practical for less.  I was, perhaps, unusual but not unique in travelling by train to school - Petts Wood to Sydenham Hill and then to Sevenoaks, totally beyond walking distance - but walking to and from the stations.  On rare occasions, I cycled to Sevenoaks but even in those days the roads were far from cycle friendly.   I have vague recollections of there being Mum's or Dad's taxis  used for some at both schools, but as I used other entrances, I have no idea of volume.

Just on Thursday afternoon, I saw the 555 bus arrive at the top of our street and drop off half a dozen school children from Corsham.  This is a double deck school service and I understand it is very fully loaded - to the extent that there is no encouragement to market it further though general public may use it if they wish.  Other buses and coaches pick up from Melksham Market Place and it's educational to see the volumes picked up there on a school day for various other towns on both early service buses and special school runs.

Quote
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: "Too many people would like to walk, wheel or cycle more often but don't feel they have safe and convenient options to do so."

"This is about creating healthier communities, helping households keep more money in their pockets and building a transport network that works better for everyone."

Dead right.  It needs to be safe and practical. Our local secondary school has recently had a "new" path opened from the new build estates to the school, at massive expense (many consider it over-engineered) and that save a long walk around 3 sides of a square, including o a shared cycle and walking path on the side of the A365 which is really far too narrow for the traffic it was taking.  Interesting, I write "new" - there has been a public footpath across the fields since before the school was located there, but it was rarely used by any school child; I can recall just one occasion when out walking the dog, mid-winter - seeing a boy using it, and stepping in and through the mud getting his shoes and trousers covered.   

Drop off time may be an issue; pick up time is worse with all the parents arriving early to be there and close to save the little darlings having to walk too far.  Car parking is inadequate for pickup, and unrestricted roads close to the school become linear car parks for a while. 

Interesting observation, used to be a school Governor in Kingston upon Thames, and had similar problem with parents parking in afternoon, or dropping off (including on yellow zig zags).  A couple of random visits couple per year from a camera equipped enforcement van at school times, instantly improved things.  Bet parents WhatsApp groups soon passed on message about dozens getting fines in post.  However I have never seen a parking enforcement van in Wiltshire (just mobile speeding enforcement camera vans), so guessing lack of enforcement is effectively allowing bad parking to be normalised

As for walking on footpaths, although the walking distances for Primary and Secondary schools go back to the Education Act 1944 (when planning post war aims).  There is a rule about safe paths, which in modern case law is basically those lit and reasonably surfaced.  Therefore the muddy path across a field wouldn't be counted for home to school distance (and this usually applies to admissions criteria too when distance is decider of if places available)
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1018


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2026, 11:24:26 »

I reckon the stated aspiration could only be achieved by the reintroduction of school/pupil catchment areas.

And I can think of a number of reasons why any government wouldn't be 'courageous' enough to do it.
Logged
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 862


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2026, 17:01:34 »

Hopefully any such increase will be accompanied - or preceded - by tuition on how to ride bikes safely and considerately.  I live a mile from a large school, which I avoid during school runs because of the general mayhem, of which manic cycling is only one factor. Nevertheless I still see wild antics some way away. My road has a narrow footpath and grass verge, and some time ago I had to take evasive action when a neighbour's two sons careered towards me on their bikes.

I've also seen small groups of schoolboys cycling at speed towards a steep path so narrow that most pedestrians  wait at one end or the other for a fellow walker heading their way. Ironically for historic reasons it's designated a bridleway, so cycling along it is legal.  Even more ironically, there are other paths that lead into the same main street that have "No cycling"  signs at either end but could accommodate a car if the central hand rail was removed.

Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 22175



View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2026, 17:07:26 »

I can offer a few observations on this topic from my own town, Nailsea, and the next village, Backwell - separated really by the railway main line from Bristol to Exeter.

Nailsea and Backwell both have excellent comprehensive schools, which feature prominently in local estate agents particulars, for example.  Nailsea School currently has around 1,150 students (including the sixth form) and Backwell School has around 1,600 (likewise).  Nailsea School is apparently noted particularly for academic subjects and Backwell School is noted for sports.  The schools are about two miles apart, and are both situated fairly centrally in the town and village respectively.

From my own experience of driving a delivery van along Station Road, I found it remarkable how many students walk between Nailsea and Backwell at school opening and closing times - where they are effectively funnelled through the bridge under the main line railway.  Some are on bikes, scooters or skateboards, but most of them walk.  It's a fairly flat geography, with pavements all the way, and a cycle lane on the only gradient at Bucklands Batch.

I have never counted them, but they must represent a fair percentage of those ministers' aim.

CfN (Chris from Nailsea, an administrator on this forum)Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 677


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2026, 14:20:51 »

I reckon the stated aspiration could only be achieved by the reintroduction of school/pupil catchment areas.

And I can think of a number of reasons why any government wouldn't be 'courageous' enough to do it.

At my children's former primary school, the majority of the children being dropped off/collected in a car had parents who were taxi drivers, or a divorced parent who was living some distance away.

My daughter is taken to secondary school in a lift share by a parent driving past to work at a location which is not accessible by public transport.

Some parents are driving anyway, but that won't be reflected in the stats.   
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page