Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Would you work in a Coffee Shop? In "Introductions and chat" [364178/30570/1] Posted by grahame at 21:38, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From The BBC
Starbucks customers in South Korea have been asked to stop bringing "bulky items" into cafes to do their office work, after some brought printers and desktop computers.
Others had brought in partitions and more than one computer to mark their office territory.
As many people choose to work from home, cafes like Starbucks have been trying to strike the balance between being a casual coffee place and welcoming customers choosing to work there.
Others had brought in partitions and more than one computer to mark their office territory.
As many people choose to work from home, cafes like Starbucks have been trying to strike the balance between being a casual coffee place and welcoming customers choosing to work there.
I have to admit working (paid work in my time, now voluntary) from coffee shops - and trains and ferries all over the place. More that one computer - yes in that I carry Lisa's laptop too (which is bulkier than mine) but no printers or partitions.
Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364177/30562/5] Posted by Marlburian at 20:24, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Last Wednesday I had a follow-up appointment at a private eye clinic working in co-operation with the NHS. The Royal Berkshire Hospital had referred me there two years ago; my eye inspection and a scan at Thatcham Hospital were reassuring. Last week I was told not to drive lest my eyes were dilated, so I took the direct 50 bus from central Reading to Green Park. I had a perfunctory eye test and was told "that's enough" with three lines left on the chart, then the nurse got me to click a button every time a white flash
appeared (to check my peripheral vision??)
The doctor said that this test told him nothing and he wondered why I'd had it. He spent 30-40 seconds peering into each eye, said they needed to be dilated but they couldn't do that then - could I return on Monday.
So yesterday back I went. Again I only had to read down to the last line but three on the chart, had my eyes dilated and then another doctor spent 30 to 40 seconds peering into each one and then discharging me. (Why couldn't that have been done last week?)
Walking to the bus stop in bright sunshine with dilated eyes wasn't any fun, and when a bus came past me and halted at a stop 30 yards in front of me. I scampered up to it and got on, to discover that it was a 9 "Breeze" service that ended at the new Green Park railway station, spending 15 minutes there before starting its return journey - up and down the streets of South Reading and taking three times along as the 50 service.
(At the start of the day I aimed to arrive at my local bus stop four or five minutes before a bus was due. In fact it arrived and departed three minutes early. I would not have been happy had I missed it and had to wait 20 minutes for the next one.)
I've been inclined to check my eyesight against neighbours' cars' registration plates, and found there was quite some difference in how easily I was able to read them on a bright day compared with a dull one.
Re: Delay Repay - Claim Change In "Fare's Fair" [364176/30569/4] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:40, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you for that interesting news, RailCornwall.
It appears that the railway ticketing systems might at last be catching up with twenty-first century technology.

Re: Boardmasters Festival - annual music event each August in Cornwall (merged posts) In "Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall" [364175/18576/25] Posted by grahame at 19:29, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Due to overcrowding because of an event between Newquay and Par the line is disrupted.
Wot? They (GWR) didn't pick that one up on their early warning radar??

Because boardmasters arrives without warning, rather like Easter.
Have I missed something? I thought that Boardmasters was centred on Finstral Beach which is to the west of Newquay Station and not between Newquay and Par. Was there something different about the event this year - such as it being bigger and expanding into new Territory? Quiterel Downs Stage?
Re: Boardmasters Festival - annual music event each August in Cornwall (merged posts) In "Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall" [364174/18576/25] Posted by broadgage at 19:13, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Due to overcrowding because of an event between Newquay and Par the line is disrupted.
Wot? They (GWR) didn't pick that one up on their early warning radar??

Because boardmasters arrives without warning, rather like Easter.
From the BBC:
Steam trains suspended due to moorland fire

The North Yorkshire Moors Railway (NYMR) has suspended its steam train services while firefighters tackle a moorland blaze.
Fire crews were called at 18:30 BST on Monday to reports of smoke at Langdale Moor near RAF Fylingdales.
North Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Service said crews would be tackling the blaze "for some time", with seven remaining at the scene on Tuesday.
The NYMR said steam services would be on hold until further notice to help "reduce pressure" on the fire service. It said: "Due to the large wildfire at Harwood Dale, which is outside the NYMR route but within the North York Moors National Park, we have made the decision to pause steam services until further notice. This is to help reduce the risk of lineside fires and reduce pressure on the fire service. We are sorry for any inconvenience this may cause and thank you for your understanding."
The NYMR said its heritage diesel fleet would still run its scheduled services.
A fire service spokesperson said crews found the fire had "jumped" a fire break put in place late on Monday, and advised local residents to keep windows and doors closed. They added the fire was covering an area more than 980ft by 980ft (300m x 300m).

The North Yorkshire Moors Railway (NYMR) has suspended its steam train services while firefighters tackle a moorland blaze.
Fire crews were called at 18:30 BST on Monday to reports of smoke at Langdale Moor near RAF Fylingdales.
North Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Service said crews would be tackling the blaze "for some time", with seven remaining at the scene on Tuesday.
The NYMR said steam services would be on hold until further notice to help "reduce pressure" on the fire service. It said: "Due to the large wildfire at Harwood Dale, which is outside the NYMR route but within the North York Moors National Park, we have made the decision to pause steam services until further notice. This is to help reduce the risk of lineside fires and reduce pressure on the fire service. We are sorry for any inconvenience this may cause and thank you for your understanding."
The NYMR said its heritage diesel fleet would still run its scheduled services.
A fire service spokesperson said crews found the fire had "jumped" a fire break put in place late on Monday, and advised local residents to keep windows and doors closed. They added the fire was covering an area more than 980ft by 980ft (300m x 300m).
Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364172/30562/5] Posted by Mark A at 18:50, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Good to know and thanks for this. It's so well embedded in the public consciousness that it would be good to remove it from *that* - not sure how best to do that. Opticians no longer having a larger than lifesize vehicle registration plate or two on various walls, that would help!
Mark
Re: All trains through Bristol Temple Meads cancelled or delayed - 12 August 2025 In "Across the West" [364171/30568/26] Posted by bobm at 18:45, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Initial reports suggest the person was hit at slow speed by a train arriving at platform 3. Although they ended up beneath the train they were removed by paramedics and taken to hospital.
Delay Repay - Claim Change In "Fare's Fair" [364170/30569/4] Posted by RailCornwall at 18:10, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Today I have claimed Delay Repay on a Mobile (App Wallet) Ticket. Interestingly no documentary evidence of the journey and transaction needed to be presented or attached. Seemingly the Delay Repay system is now linked across to the customer's purchasing account and the required information for the delay repay process harvested and passed automatically to delay repay. This was not the case a couple of weeks ago when documents needed to be included in the claim. It will be interesting to see whether this harvesting is now extended across to RTT et al to expedite the payment of claims. I will update this thread when the process completes.
Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364169/30562/5] Posted by eXPassenger at 17:47, 12th August 2025 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
An eyesight test that requires the driver to be able to read a numberplate at 20 metres is archaic: it has never has been fit for purpose and needs to be ... retired.
It has been retired. The requirement now is:
You must have a visual acuity at least 0.5 (6/12) measured on the Snellen scale in both eyes, or in one eye only.
Eye test charts now have a horizontal line at this point.
Re: Britons booking 'later, closer, shorter' UK breaks In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [364168/30549/31] Posted by LiskeardRich at 17:46, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've not yet booked my Autumn break.
I’m going to Marrakech in October. March 2026 East Germany, Warsaw, krakow and anywhere in between, a miniature version of Grahame’s recent travels. I’ll come home for 2 days then I’m going to Lanzarote for a few days with my wife. Mainland Europe is no interest to her so she’s sent me off on my own to tick a few to dos off my list.
Re: "More trains than usual needing repair" In "Across the West" [364166/30447/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 17:20, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cancellations to services between Gatwick Airport and Reading via Redhill
Due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time between Gatwick Airport and Reading fewer trains are able to run. Disruption is expected until 18:00 12/08.
Train services between Gatwick Airport and Reading via Redhill and Guildford may be cancelled.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
Several trains cooling systems have failed and this has resulted in several consecutive cancellations.
All trains through Bristol Temple Meads cancelled or delayed - 12 August 2025 In "Across the West" [364165/30568/26] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 16:41, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From the BBC:
All train services into Bristol Temple Meads Station are either cancelled or delayed while emergency services respond to an incident.
Great Western Railway (GWR) announced just before 16:00 BST that all lines are currently blocked, with the disruption expected to last until at least 18:30.
GWR said a person had been struck by a train, adding: "Emergency services are on site currently. Whilst the situation is assessed all trains in the area are not able to move."
The operator said further updates would be posted on its website and that it was looking at other public transport options that might be able to help stranded passengers.
Great Western Railway (GWR) announced just before 16:00 BST that all lines are currently blocked, with the disruption expected to last until at least 18:30.
GWR said a person had been struck by a train, adding: "Emergency services are on site currently. Whilst the situation is assessed all trains in the area are not able to move."
The operator said further updates would be posted on its website and that it was looking at other public transport options that might be able to help stranded passengers.
Re: HST derailment, near Stonehaven, 12th August 2020 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [364164/23891/51] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 16:34, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From the BBC:
'Action still needed' five years after fatal derailment

Donald Dinnie, Christopher Stuchbury and Brett McCullough died in the 2020 crash
"Urgent action" is still needed to improve rail safety after the Stonehaven train derailment which left three men dead five years ago, a union has warned.
The Aberdeen to Glasgow train derailed at Carmont in Aberdeenshire on 12 August 2020 after hitting a landslide following heavy rain.
Driver Brett McCullough, 45, conductor Donald Dinnie, 58, and passenger Christopher Stuchbury, 62, died. Network Rail was fined £6.7m in 2023 after admitting a series of failings which led to the deaths.
The RMT union said eight of 20 safety recommendations still remained incomplete. Network Rail said "meaningful progress" had been made.
The Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) annual report for 2024, published earlier this year, revealed eight of its 20 safety recommendations remained "open".
These included control room capability and drainage design. It was based on information provided by the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) about work carried out before 31 March this year.
"Open" is described as the recommendation being taken into consideration and action being taken to implement it.
The ORR said the rail industry had taken "significant steps", and recommendations which remained open had "agreed plans to implement the recommended actions".

On the 5th anniversary, RMT general secretary Eddie Dempsey said: "Our thoughts are with the families of Donald, Brett and Chris, and with those injured and traumatised in the crash. But remembrance alone is not enough - there must be action, and it needs to be urgent. It is outrageous that five years after the accident took place, and three years since the RAIB set out what needed to change, that so many safety recommendations are still outstanding."
He added: "We demand better - for those we lost, for those who survived, and for the safety of every worker and passenger going forward."
Network Rail also said its thoughts were with everyone involved in the Carmont tragedy. "Since August 2020, we've been working hard to make our railway safer for passengers and colleagues," a statement said. "We're investing more than £400m in projects to strengthen the railway's resilience to increasingly unpredictable weather."
It added: "Meaningful progress has been made on the recommendations from the Carmont investigation, which includes co-ordinated action across all Network Rail routes, and we continue to work closely with the ORR, train operators, and other key stakeholders."
(BBC article continues)

Donald Dinnie, Christopher Stuchbury and Brett McCullough died in the 2020 crash
"Urgent action" is still needed to improve rail safety after the Stonehaven train derailment which left three men dead five years ago, a union has warned.
The Aberdeen to Glasgow train derailed at Carmont in Aberdeenshire on 12 August 2020 after hitting a landslide following heavy rain.
Driver Brett McCullough, 45, conductor Donald Dinnie, 58, and passenger Christopher Stuchbury, 62, died. Network Rail was fined £6.7m in 2023 after admitting a series of failings which led to the deaths.
The RMT union said eight of 20 safety recommendations still remained incomplete. Network Rail said "meaningful progress" had been made.
The Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) annual report for 2024, published earlier this year, revealed eight of its 20 safety recommendations remained "open".
These included control room capability and drainage design. It was based on information provided by the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) about work carried out before 31 March this year.
"Open" is described as the recommendation being taken into consideration and action being taken to implement it.
The ORR said the rail industry had taken "significant steps", and recommendations which remained open had "agreed plans to implement the recommended actions".

On the 5th anniversary, RMT general secretary Eddie Dempsey said: "Our thoughts are with the families of Donald, Brett and Chris, and with those injured and traumatised in the crash. But remembrance alone is not enough - there must be action, and it needs to be urgent. It is outrageous that five years after the accident took place, and three years since the RAIB set out what needed to change, that so many safety recommendations are still outstanding."
He added: "We demand better - for those we lost, for those who survived, and for the safety of every worker and passenger going forward."
Network Rail also said its thoughts were with everyone involved in the Carmont tragedy. "Since August 2020, we've been working hard to make our railway safer for passengers and colleagues," a statement said. "We're investing more than £400m in projects to strengthen the railway's resilience to increasingly unpredictable weather."
It added: "Meaningful progress has been made on the recommendations from the Carmont investigation, which includes co-ordinated action across all Network Rail routes, and we continue to work closely with the ORR, train operators, and other key stakeholders."
(BBC article continues)
Smoking is bad for yourhealth In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [364163/30567/52] Posted by CyclingSid at 14:51, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Maybe it is sensible that UK does not allow smoking in station premises.
https://www.rte.ie/news/2025/0810/1527801-man-train-austria/
Other case suggests, perhaps not the best way to sample a high speed train.
Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364162/30562/5] Posted by Witham Bobby at 14:09, 12th August 2025 Already liked by GBM | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My dad gave up driving at around 84 years - he'd driven tractors, cars and LGVs all his life from teenage years. My father-in-law gave up driving at about 91. He'd been a village bobby and had been police trained on motorbikes and patrol cars, but hadn't actually taken a test before he got his driving licence
I wish both had ceased driving several years before they actually did, although I know it would have affected bth of them greatly in terms of getting around
And now at 70, I'm wondering when it will be my turn to forego the licence, At present with good unaided visiion and (what I think are) quick reactions and a weekly milage in the mid hundreds at least, I'm in no rush
I think the eyesight test prior to renewal, rather than self certification, is a great idea. Also mandatory health, mobility and reaction tests at some point, possibly 80
The rules are there for a reason ... but in the most exceptional of circumstances if the reason is overtaken by the need for action outside of them, then I applaud the gentlemen concerned. I hope he reads some of this groundswell of praise and support on social media and gets considerable solice from knowing his action saved a life. Whoever you are, sir, THANK YOU.
Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364159/30562/5] Posted by TonyK at 11:26, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From The Telegraph via Facebook

Yes - but if there is a significant risk of you changing the life of others you'll just have to accept the life change. Perhaps even see it as a new start or phase. This story highlights the impact of the changes on people. My understanding is that the proposal is not to take away license at 90, but to take away licenses if and when your reduced eyesight means you can no longer drive safely

Yes - but if there is a significant risk of you changing the life of others you'll just have to accept the life change. Perhaps even see it as a new start or phase. This story highlights the impact of the changes on people. My understanding is that the proposal is not to take away license at 90, but to take away licenses if and when your reduced eyesight means you can no longer drive safely
Agree entirely. The Trolleygraph looking for a self-identified victim to use as today's tool against the government doesn't surprise me. That we let someone drive who is clearly unable to understand the rules is a matter for concern.
It’ll be much easier to organise next year, with the new infrastructure on the branch in place.
It looks like they have a service every 2 hours to beyond Plymouth today, mostly to Paddington. Will it be able to be hourly next year, and will they have enough trains and enough staff?
Time will tell on that one.
What it should be able to do at the very least is mean the additional services can be supplemented by a local service, perhaps with more carriages if the 175s have been fully introduced.
The current situation meant potential issues all weekend - so much so that the goods loops at Lostwithiel and Par had special dispensation for passenger trains if needed to avoid blocking the main line.
There will certainly be less of an excuse for things to go wrong, though by and large it seemed to go fairly smoothly this year.
A spokesperson for GWR said: "We're pleased to hear that the customer wasn't more seriously hurt in this incident, and we commend our station staff for their swift response. While accidents can happen, the railway presents significant risks. For everyone's safety, passengers should never enter the track. Instead, please immediately contact a member of staff who can safely stop all trains and assist you."
I have to say that I find the final paragraph in the GWR statement somewhat distasteful (and, regrettably, predictable) - it praises the "station staff for their swift response" - then goes on to "tick off" the man for taking immediate action. I must suppose the mystery man was expected to produce his phone and send a text to 61016.................and look around for (probably) non-existent staff. I daresay he knew full well that jumping down onto the track was not the safest thing to do - but his concern for the fallen passenger overcame his concern for his own safety. People used to get the George Cross for that - now they get b*******d by someone in GWR's ivory tower.
How about GWR saying "well done sir" to the unknown man - at the very least

He'd possibly not want to identify himself for fear of the dressing-down he'd get for going over the yellow line and onto the tracks, and possibly into further trouble for trespassing on the railway, maximum penalty £1,000
I'm glad this man had time and presence of mind to weigh-up the situation and to provide timely assistance
Re: Compulsory eye tests for drivers over 70 years old? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [364156/30562/5] Posted by CyclingSid at 10:00, 12th August 2025 Already liked by matth1j, Mark A | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I used to cycle a reasonable amount, including commuting, but the thought of getting on a bike now at 60 scares me.
Do you live on a remote Scottish island, or are you just exceptionally brave?
Do you live on a remote Scottish island, or are you just exceptionally brave?

Live in Reading, and possibly exceptionally stupid. Also not a lot of choice if you don't drive and don't live on a remote Scottish island.
Some would say that "Motornormativity" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motonormativity is part of the problem.
The BBC reference gives detail. With input from Ian Walker. "Sippy Downs" sounds like somewhere not to drive!
Re: [otd] 11th August 2005 - Registration of "Save the Train" domain In "TransWilts line" [364155/30565/18] Posted by grahame at 09:54, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That route does look good, to my untrained eye anyway.
EDIT removed daft suggestion
EDIT removed daft suggestion
Yes ... I would have preferred 10d which would have varied it at the south end crossing the K&A canal and the A361 and running in to the A350 a little south. As it is, the 90 degree corner just south of Bowerhill will/would be a 90 degree corner for "ever". I understand there are ecology / wildlife / heritage issues on the "d" rather than the "c" variant - but then there are also issues of that sort at the top end of the proposed route too, and in the absence of any other practical alternative they have been overcome.
The proposed route does sort out a myriad of other issues locally, and offer opportunities some of which are not popular or worrisome. And a fast route past Melksham for longer distance traffic, and improvements at Yarnbrook that are in the pipeline, is going to make Westbury all the gummier.
Re: [otd] 11th August 2005 - Registration of "Save the Train" domain In "TransWilts line" [364154/30565/18] Posted by matth1j at 09:31, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That route does look good, to my untrained eye anyway.
EDIT removed daft suggestion
Re: [otd] 11th August 2005 - Registration of "Save the Train" domain In "TransWilts line" [364153/30565/18] Posted by grahame at 09:28, 12th August 2025 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is going to be the 'Bypass of the bypass', yes.? Provision for the Wilts and Berks Canal klaxon too.
Mark
Mark
Yes. A new bypass to replace the previous one which didn't / doesn't bypass the northern quarter of the town nor the village of Beanacre.
Provision IS included for the Wilts and Berks Canal to pass under to the extent that it will not be a blockage - the new bypass if built will be at a level well above where it crosses the course of the old canal and a culvert big enough for boats to be included. It is to be hoped / pushed at planning stage for the culvert to be big enough for towpath and cycles too.
Re: [otd] 11th August 2005 - Registration of "Save the Train" domain In "TransWilts line" [364152/30565/18] Posted by Mark A at 09:21, 12th August 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is going to be the 'Bypass of the bypass', yes.? Provision for the Wilts and Berks Canal klaxon too.
Mark
Re: [otd] 11th August 2005 - Registration of "Save the Train" domain In "TransWilts line" [364149/30565/18] Posted by grahame at 09:00, 12th August 2025 Already liked by Witham Bobby, matth1j | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As a picture paints a thousand words, 2 maps showing the proposed bypass route that's officially favoured - one as to how it passes Melksham and the other in the regional context.


Interestingly, drawing this map has brought me to the realisation that M4 to Devizes traffic would be to some extent sponged onto the A350 as well were it easier to get past Melksham.