Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 07 Oct 2024
 
* Deadly blast hits convoy of Chinese engineers in Pakistan
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 11/10/24 - TWSW General Meeting
22/10/24 - BoA Public Transport talk
25/10/24 - Melksham Transport Group
27/11/24 - WWRUG, Trowbridge

No 'On This Day' events reported for 7th Oct

Train RunningCancelled
08:36 Redhill to Reading
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:35 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
17:33 Banbury to Didcot Parkway
Short Run
09:16 Paignton to Exmouth
Delayed
05:51 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
October 07, 2024, 09:16:56 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
[102] Comparing old and new trains
[85] ARE there enough train crew?
[77] Why punch a hole in a rover / ranger ticket?
[66] 11th October 2024 - Travelwatch Southwest general meeting, Tau...
[46] Shortage of train crews on Great Western Railway - ongoing dis...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Forum agreement - addition of vexatious interacter  (Read 8231 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42047



View Profile WWW Email
« on: February 25, 2013, 07:45:29 »

The forum agreement (what you agree to when you join) has been amended, adding an extra paragraph which describes how we will handle a poster (or other party) who sets out to waste the moderators' and / or admins' time in the future.  We have no such cases ongoing at present (in fact I can only think of one or possibly two times it would have been considered in the past 7 years), but the subject came up when I was reviewing terms for another (new) interactive site I'm advising on, and I've learned the practise from the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) and Local Ombudsman sites.

* See {here} for the modified agreement

* See {here} for a longer background on agreement changes from the standard (via my blog archive)

* This amendment comes into immediate effect for new registrants for the forum, and in 7 days from now (08:00 on 4th March 2013) for existing members.

For quick reference, here's the new paragraph.   Long may it remain unused!

Quote
A "vexatious interacter" is one who posts / acts in such as way as to increase the workload and stress on the web site operator, and the web site team supporting that operator.  The site operation and support team (including owner, programmers, administrators and moderators) will declare that a member or other party is a vexatious interacter in exceptional circumstances, and the team's decision as to what's exceptional will be final.  Any sanctions which the team feels appropriate to safeguard the site and its aims, or to reduce the support work overhead that such a vexatious interacter may generate, may be taken without the application of our standard rules, methods, courtesies or policies.  Vexatious interacters who wish to make a formal approach to the web site owners may do so in a letter sent via the Royal Mail, postage prepaid, to the address at which the domain is registered, and will be answered if appropriate within four weeks of the receipt of the letter.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2013, 08:01:53 by bobm » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2013, 07:57:54 »

At the risk of falling foul of the new rule, I feel obliged to point out that there is no agent noun for the verb "interact"; therefore "interacter" isn't a real word.

And even if it was, it would probably be spelt "interactor"...
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42047



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2013, 08:36:21 »

At the risk of falling foul of the new rule, I feel obliged to point out that there is no agent noun for the verb "interact"; therefore "interacter" isn't a real word.

And even if it was, it would probably be spelt "interactor"...

Hi, TJ ... thanks ... better to get it accurate and we'll update it [within 24 hours?].   I'll be gobsmacked if anyone falls foul of it more than once in every five blue moons;  now's a good time to put in the safety net as there's nothing even on the horizon that might use it.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2013, 08:59:13 »

Can I suggest you change 'Interacter' to 'Poster'? It requires a bit less explanation!
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42047



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2013, 09:12:08 »

Can I suggest you change 'Interacter' to 'Poster'? It requires a bit less explanation!

You may ... and we considered that. However, we're also catching people who sign up to "bomb" people via p.m.s, notifys, etc - so we were looking for a more general term.   Suggestions for something better that "interacter" that gives the wide coverage are welcomed - it's not "poster", not really "contributor" either, but it could be something else.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2013, 09:48:20 »

Vexatious user.
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10094



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2013, 10:21:06 »

Member?  In that they have to sign up to PM, notify, post etc...
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6537


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2013, 21:36:30 »

Sorry, I was looking for the pedantry section (or should it be thread?) but I ended up here...

Logged

Now, please!
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1916


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2013, 04:14:16 »

Vexatious user.
Member?  In that they have to sign up to PM, notify, post etc...
Both of those sound much better than "interactor".

What about "vexatious use occurs when a member ..."?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42047



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2013, 10:51:27 »

Vexatious user.
Member?  In that they have to sign up to PM, notify, post etc...
Both of those sound much better than "interactor".

What about "vexatious use occurs when a member ..."?

Hmmm ... I'm in complete agreement that "interactor" is naff.  However, user / member / poster are all terms which could be argued by a vexatious person - "I don't consider myself to be a poster any longer because my account is locked - so you can't designate me as a vexatious poster".

I am tempted to go for "Vexatious person", and add a note that for the purpose of this paragraph, "person" also includes a group of people.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2013, 12:42:44 »

I am tempted to go for "Vexatious person", and add a note that for the purpose of this paragraph, "person" also includes a group of people.

You could save yourself a bit of trouble by using a noun with the same singular and plural form.

"Vexatious Sheep" doesn't really work, but "swine" might, though. Wink
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42047



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2024, 09:00:58 »

Reminded of this today - party because it came up when I searched the forum for " 4th Mar" because it was an otherwise quiet day. 

There is an irony in this coming up now.  Over the weekend, I answered a social media post that was burning bright with plenty of fuel being added by keyboard warriors ... not my ward, not my specialist subject, but over 40 posts in 12 hours and not a single other councillor nor staff member had jumped in.  Public loved my answer (and it straightened a lot of things) ... fellow councillors with the Conservatives and Lib Dems, and one of their mothers, suggested that I was being critical and unreasonable in hoping for a faster input from someone who has inside information about what's going on.  Sad really, but then everyone's batting hard to up their profile appearing in the local paper on all sorts of pretexts, some relating to projects they're little involved in.   Must be coming towards the end of the current council and we all have just a year to win the popularity stakes again - May '25 elections.

Thank you for being a WONDERFUL group of members here on the Coffee Shop.  We have issues with railways and transport and different views between ourselves but - worlds apart!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page