Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 15:48:24 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: GWRF2020-15 Fares and ticketing  (Read 2992 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« on: November 30, 2017, 08:42:51 »

Consultation Question 15

a) Do you agree or disagree with these priorities for i) fares and ii) ticketing?
– Agree
– Disagree
Which priorities would you change or add, and why?
b) What changes to the fares structure could be of benefit to you?



Explanatory text

Fares-setting on the future Great Western franchise will largely be driven by national fares policy. At present, approximately 45% of Great Western ticket revenue comes from fares that are regulated, for which individual fare increases are currently capped at inflation, as measured by the Retail Prices Index. Other aspects of the fares and ticketing regime are also guided by national policy, to maintain consistency across the national network, but the franchise specification could encourage or require the franchisee to:
●● Develop and promote the use of smart cards, contactless payment cards and mobile ticketing, and the range of tickets available by these means;
46
●● Develop a wider range of tickets integrated with local buses and other modes, including co-operation with local authority smartcard schemes;
●● Provide more ticket vending machines and ensure that these will offer the full range of fares available, in particular making these easier to use and making it easy to understand which is the most appropriate fare for the journey being made;
●● Address any anomalies in current fares arrangements, e.g. where fares on some routes might, for historical reasons, be being set by an operator who does not operate those routes, or are based on historical splits between different service groups;
●● Promote a wider range of local tourist attractions, e.g. through joint marketing and joint ticketing arrangements

See http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=19037 for the background to this topic
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2017, 15:47:04 »

Consultation Question 15

a) Do you agree or disagree with these priorities for i) fares and ii) ticketing?
– Agree
– Disagree
Which priorities would you change or add, and why?
b) What changes to the fares structure could be of benefit to you?



Explanatory text

Fares-setting on the future Great Western franchise will largely be driven by national fares policy. At present, approximately 45% of Great Western ticket revenue comes from fares that are regulated, for which individual fare increases are currently capped at inflation, as measured by the Retail Prices Index. Other aspects of the fares and ticketing regime are also guided by national policy, to maintain consistency across the national network, but the franchise specification could encourage or require the franchisee to:
●● Develop and promote the use of smart cards, contactless payment cards and mobile ticketing, and the range of tickets available by these means;
46
●● Develop a wider range of tickets integrated with local buses and other modes, including co-operation with local authority smartcard schemes;
●● Provide more ticket vending machines and ensure that these will offer the full range of fares available, in particular making these easier to use and making it easy to understand which is the most appropriate fare for the journey being made;
●● Address any anomalies in current fares arrangements, e.g. where fares on some routes might, for historical reasons, be being set by an operator who does not operate those routes, or are based on historical splits between different service groups;
●● Promote a wider range of local tourist attractions, e.g. through joint marketing and joint ticketing arrangements

See http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=19037 for the background to this topic


Fares and ticketing are coming high up the list you want to discuss on 7th January, yet not a peep from anyone here yet.


Here's a couple of starters

1. "Off Peak" fares should be available for between 50% and 75% of the time, and should apply at times of day / times of the week when there is reduced demand for travel but that travel is cheaper to provide.

Monday - 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. and 8 p.m. to midnight
Tuesday to Thursday - 5 a.m. to 7 a.m, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m and 8 p.m. to midnight
Friday - 5 a.m. to 7 a.m and 9 a.m. to 3 p.m
Saturday and Sunday - 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.

2. A resident loyalty card ... 33% off off peak tickets for anyone with an established UK (United Kingdom) address, priced as other rail cards or perhaps a little more expensive?    Platinum card offering higher initial cost but then 50% discount?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2017, 16:18:21 »

No one has mentioned the extortionate fares being charged for long distance anytime tickets - because they are not regulated!  There must be a absolute cap on Standard Class fares per mile.

No anytime (single) fares to be more than 6x the weekly (two-way) season ticket for the journey

An end to all return fares - all journeys to be charged as single fares.

Either end Day Returns or make them available for all journeys that can reasonably be done in a day. 

No walk-on fares to be higher than the split tickets for journeys where more than 50% of trains stop at the intermediate station used in the split.  (So a swindon Paddington Fare could not be more than the split at Didcot and/or Reading)



Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2017, 16:56:08 »

Re Off #peak hours.

Not sure I like your evening peak gap. Remember when SR(resolve) had Pink Off peak tickets. Endless trouble both selling them trying explain they couldn't come back from 16:30 to 19:00 or thereabouts and then enforcement (but I suppose gates solve that???

If you are going to have an evening gap why not have 04:00 07:00 Off peak.

Don't like after 18:00 weekends again have to be explained and enforced is it worth it for the extra revenue.

Agree with ellendune re long distance anytime fares.

Fares in a day my wife did Taplow Edinburgh and back (05:30 start) and stll had time to attend a funeral.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2018, 12:46:56 »


An end to all return fares - all journeys to be charged as single fares.

I agree with this as a model for calculating the fares, but the last time I ever did a single rail journey was about 1981! 

I'd still like to be able to buy the properly calculated out and back fare in a single action at a TVM (Ticket Vending Machine), hopefully when still at the 'first' departure station.
 
Paul
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1204


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2018, 13:41:04 »

Two quick wins:

Roll the Devon/Cornwall part-time season tickets out across the whole franchise. There has been a lot of mithering in recent years about how to implement part-time tickets. GWR (Great Western Railway) has a model up and running in one part of its network, it just needs to extend it.

Apply a consistent logic for determining the fare-setter for a particular flow. If the journey from Frogsville to Little Mithering is 80% GWR and 20% Some Other Operator, it should be GWR who set the price, not SOO. There are too many places where this isn't the case - there are even some where the fare is set by An Entirely Different Operator, on whose services the passenger would never travel for this flow - and it leads to some serious anomalies. (I'm assuming the 80/20 is calculated by mileage, but there could be a case for 'biasing' it in favour of the intercity operator, etc. etc.)

And a bigger ask:

Discounted advance-only fares should be offered as a last resort where it's not possible to fill seats with walk-up fares. Where possible, walk-up fares should be set at a level to fill trains, thereby maximising revenue and offering maximum flexibility to the passenger - if necessary by offering special walk-up products for shoulder-peak, contra-peak and similar. As with ellendune's suggestion, this should be arranged such that two singles (e.g. shoulder-peak out, peak return) aren't prohibitive when compared to a return ticket.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2018, 16:17:51 »

Two quick wins:


And a bigger ask:

Discounted advance-only fares should be offered as a last resort where it's not possible to fill seats with walk-up fares. Where possible, walk-up fares should be set at a level to fill trains, thereby maximising revenue and offering maximum flexibility to the passenger - if necessary by offering special walk-up products for shoulder-peak, contra-peak and similar. As with ellendune's suggestion, this should be arranged such that two singles (e.g. shoulder-peak out, peak return) aren't prohibitive when compared to a return ticket.

That would at best discourage, at worst exclude large groups of people from using trains for long distance travel unless they were able to make their journeys on a few services in the middle of the day or late at night - this is not "maximising flexibility" for the majority of people, quite the opposite. Trains are largely already full and over capacity  around peak time anywhere near major centres of work/conurbation albeit in many cases by season ticket holders, so setting fares "at a level to fill trains" doesn't really come into it.

The pressure should be on TOCs (Train Operating Company) to increase capacity, not reduce demand by pricing people off the trains.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2018, 16:25:38 by TaplowGreen » Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1204


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2018, 22:22:00 »

It's cheap fares (and, in particular, group discounts) that enable large groups to travel economically, not advance-booked fares. There are TOCs (Train Operating Company) that don't offer any advance-booked fares at all yet still offer group discounts.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2018, 05:36:48 »

It's cheap fares (and, in particular, group discounts) that enable large groups to travel economically, not advance-booked fares. There are TOCs (Train Operating Company) that don't offer any advance-booked fares at all yet still offer group discounts.

Sorry Richard you've misunderstood me - I wasn't referring to group bookings, I meant large numbers of individuals.

I can see that my original post may have been a little ambiguous!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2018, 02:55:24 »

See also http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=19203 - where a light humoured start turned serious.



I note that there are lots of leisure products that are "3 out of 8" and "8 out of 15" style.  Why not offer such products for season tickets (anytime, two specific end points, any permitted or specific routing) and we'll as the ranger / rover / freedom approach of off peak, any journey with a network / area?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page