Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 01:15 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningShort Run
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 01:17:28 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW requests new franchise terms  (Read 17568 times)
r james
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 223


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: October 16, 2008, 20:47:01 »

Even if both FGW (First Great Western) and ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) and Northern could get rid of the pacers, by replacing with 172s, it would be a bonus.  I dont want the 150s to be wasted.

Also, remember that the first group do indeed own some of their HST (High Speed Train) train sets, so if they lsot their franchise, they would take those units with them, so thing would be even more tight on the GW (Great Western) franchise. 
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: October 16, 2008, 21:33:49 »

How is the 172 idea a fantasy?

I would call the idea that a lot of DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) routes will be electric within the next decades a fantasy!

Obviously, the Sprinters would be cascaded elsewhere, but they are clapped out.

They can no longer do the Lickely Incline, they struggle at Old Hill in B'ham. Some are so clapped out, they can't exceed 50 - 60 mph.

We need to look at scrapping them. Adding an extra bulk load of 172s would be the cheapest way of getting new stock to relieve overcrowding and release 153s etc for Transwilts and Walsall.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: October 17, 2008, 00:33:16 »

How is the 172 idea a fantasy?

I would call the idea that a lot of DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) routes will be electric within the next decades a fantasy!

Obviously, the Sprinters would be cascaded elsewhere, but they are clapped out.

They can no longer do the Lickely Incline, they struggle at Old Hill in B'ham. Some are so clapped out, they can't exceed 50 - 60 mph.

We need to look at scrapping them. Adding an extra bulk load of 172s would be the cheapest way of getting new stock to relieve overcrowding and release 153s etc for Transwilts and Walsall.

Yes, the 150s are feeling the strain of being hammered up and down on arduous commuter duties around the West Midlands for 20 years. That doesn't mean to say that with a proper refresh and mechanical overhaul that they can't be made good for another decade of less stressful work, such as West Country branches, or Bristol commuter services - no Lickey inclines there - which is exactly what is proposed for them. And how often do they need to exceed 60mph anyway in the West Midlands?

The fact is that the Government and Network Rail are both serious about electrification - where the oil price went earlier this year has made sure of that. Yes, it takes time to get wires up, but once you commit to a new diesel fleet, you are stuck with it - the current build of 172s will be expected to run until something like 2040! What will oil cost then?

Once you electrify the main lines, which means you have to do the complex, expensive bits like major stations and junctions, then doing other routes is a much more economic proposition. If the GMWL were electrified into Devon, then wiring the Torbay and Exmouth branches would be a no-brainer, and so on. So your need for dmus starts to go down fast. The same sort of process would happen in the North if the Trans Pennine Express lines were wired, as they connect with so many other routes.

The BR (British Rail(ways)) 15X-series DMUs and the Turbos will be reaching the end of the line between about 2015 and 2025, which gives time to start wiring and then bring in new electric trains to replace them. Start building a vast fleet of 172s now and they would be just 10 years old with many years' life left in them, but nothing to do.

And you still haven't said how you might pay for all these 'cheap' 172s.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #33 on: October 17, 2008, 07:40:14 »

Fears are being expressed over National Express East Coast's ability to meet its franchise premium payments commitment (link below.)
http://www.journallive.co.uk/north-east-news/todays-news/2008/10/16/downturn-could-derail-east-coast-train-service-61634-22045613/
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: October 17, 2008, 18:07:53 »

Hmmm, I don't think NXEC (National Express East Coast) will be the only ones finding it a challenge to meet their premium payment commitments over the next few years.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: October 17, 2008, 18:19:40 »

How is the 172 idea a fantasy?

I would call the idea that a lot of DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) routes will be electric within the next decades a fantasy!

Obviously, the Sprinters would be cascaded elsewhere, but they are clapped out.

They can no longer do the Lickely Incline, they struggle at Old Hill in B'ham. Some are so clapped out, they can't exceed 50 - 60 mph.

We need to look at scrapping them. Adding an extra bulk load of 172s would be the cheapest way of getting new stock to relieve overcrowding and release 153s etc for Transwilts and Walsall.

Yes, the 150s are feeling the strain of being hammered up and down on arduous commuter duties around the West Midlands for 20 years. That doesn't mean to say that with a proper refresh and mechanical overhaul that they can't be made good for another decade of less stressful work, such as West Country branches, or Bristol commuter services - no Lickey inclines there - which is exactly what is proposed for them. And how often do they need to exceed 60mph anyway in the West Midlands?

The fact is that the Government and Network Rail are both serious about electrification - where the oil price went earlier this year has made sure of that. Yes, it takes time to get wires up, but once you commit to a new diesel fleet, you are stuck with it - the current build of 172s will be expected to run until something like 2040! What will oil cost then?

Once you electrify the main lines, which means you have to do the complex, expensive bits like major stations and junctions, then doing other routes is a much more economic proposition. If the GMWL were electrified into Devon, then wiring the Torbay and Exmouth branches would be a no-brainer, and so on. So your need for dmus starts to go down fast. The same sort of process would happen in the North if the Trans Pennine Express lines were wired, as they connect with so many other routes.

The BR (British Rail(ways)) 15X-series DMUs and the Turbos will be reaching the end of the line between about 2015 and 2025, which gives time to start wiring and then bring in new electric trains to replace them. Start building a vast fleet of 172s now and they would be just 10 years old with many years' life left in them, but nothing to do.

And you still haven't said how you might pay for all these 'cheap' 172s.

Fair enough, but I am not convinced that the gov is really hooked on electrification. An announcement is not enough.

I agree with what you say. I would rather a rolling electrification programme. But would the wires be up in time?

Between Kidderminster and Worcester, line speed is mostly 75 mph with stops 9-10 mins apart.

True about paying. But the wires will have to be paid for as well!

Let's hope for electrification.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: October 17, 2008, 21:21:10 »

I wouldn't dispute you can get up some speed on the Worcester-Kidderminster section, but almost all the other routes out of Snow Hill have the stations close together, so good acceleration is really what you need, not necessarily a high top speed - another argument for electrification, of course...

And given where DafT stood on electrification only last year - hated the very idea - they have done a pretty sharp U-turn, which is why Kelly's conference speech was hopefully rather more than just a good soundbite.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: October 18, 2008, 18:41:55 »

And given where DafT stood on electrification only last year - hated the very idea - they have done a pretty sharp U-turn, which is why Kelly's conference speech was hopefully rather more than just a good soundbite.

That might be the trouble, all it would take is another u-turn back in the favour of new methods of train propulsion - somehow tapping into the vast amount of hot air that comes out of MP (Member of Parliament)'s mouths perhaps? On a serious note though, I do believe (and hope) that electrification IS very much on the agenda.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #38 on: October 18, 2008, 20:05:22 »

At the TravelWatch SouthWest meeting in Taunton, two weeks ago, Dave Ward of Network Rail spoke very positively about the future of electrification using overhead wires.

Apparently, the recent turmoil in the fossil fuel market, with prices of diesel soaring, has indeed brought about a fundamental change of heart in the DfT» (Department for Transport - about).  Dave's comments, in response to further questioning, were that it is becoming 'increasingly more possible' that the future, westwards, will involve electrification.  The rebuilding at Reading includes inherent provision for Crossrail / electrification to be extended westwards: just how far (for example, 'to Minehead rather than Maidenhead', as one questioner phrased it, rather mischievously!) remains to be seen.

Dave Ward's view was that anything is possible - although he warned that we are necessarily looking in terms of 'generations' - not just his, but his childrens.  However, anything is possible: Bristol is apparently fairly easy (albeit expensive!) to achieve, if the will is there.  West of Bristol, it's less clear: however, Dave was quite specific that the Severn Tunnel could be electrified, so further development westwards towards Plymouth and / or Cardiff are not ruled out.

(My apologies if I'm paraphrasing Dave Ward's actual points - I'm writing from memory, and scribbled notes, but grahame and Ollie were also there, so they can perhaps put me straight, if I have got my wires crossed!).
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #39 on: October 20, 2008, 23:35:08 »

Fears are being expressed over National Express East Coast's ability to meet its franchise premium payments commitment (link below.)
http://www.journallive.co.uk/north-east-news/todays-news/2008/10/16/downturn-could-derail-east-coast-train-service-61634-22045613/

Hmmm, I don't think NXEC (National Express East Coast) will be the only ones finding it a challenge to meet their premium payment commitments over the next few years.

National Express East Coast is expected to give an upbeat view of its prospects in Thursday's trading update (link below.)
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/investing-and-markets/article.html?in_article_id=455775&in_page_id=3
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: October 21, 2008, 12:37:37 »

Poor old First Group, like I've said many times on this forum, First just didn't do their Homework before putting up a Massive Bid for the Greater Western Franchise, was it or was it not that First Group's Bid was about 5 times the ^200m bid of National Express.

If First want New terms then the franchise (and all other First group rail franchise's) should be reopened to all would be operators.

Something that they are over spending on is a shortage of Train Crew, with crews being almost able to state their OWN terms of payments to work overtime, to prevent FGW (First Great Western) cancelling Trains due to Staff shortages.

Of course then theres contractors Like ISS brought in to DO WORK that was done by FGW's own staff before, Saving Money? you got to be joking!!!!!!
Logged
12hoursunday
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #41 on: October 21, 2008, 13:02:36 »

Franchise, was it or was it not that First Group's Bid was about 5 times the ^200m bid of National Express.


Don't know. Was it. When did become privvy to the financial details of these bids?


Something that they are over spending on is a shortage of Train Crew, with crews being almost able to state their OWN terms of payments to work overtime, to prevent FGW (First Great Western) cancelling Trains due to Staff shortages.



This isn't happening anymore. It's true that some of us traincrew have made a little money out of the predicament that FGW had found themselves in, however paying the traincrew the extra money was still cheaper than any costs incurred from cancellation penalties etc. ( can i just add that I never held any resourcing managers to a ransom when being asked to do extra)
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: October 21, 2008, 13:09:12 »



Something that they are over spending on is a shortage of Train Crew, with crews being almost able to state their OWN terms of payments to work overtime, to prevent FGW (First Great Western) cancelling Trains due to Staff shortages.



This isn't happening anymore. It's true that some of us traincrew have made a little money out of the predicament that FGW had found themselves in, however paying the traincrew the extra money was still cheaper than any costs incurred from cancellation penalties etc. ( can i just add that I never held any resourcing managers to a ransom when being asked to do extra)

Maybe you didn't, but many did. October/November is always a good month in terms of driver resources - not many drivers are on holiday. Expect there to be one final round of enforced company generocity and greedy drivers taking advantage of it during December, before, hopefully, enough trainee's are passed out in time for next summer squeeze on resources.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: October 21, 2008, 23:13:34 »

I for one hope FGW (First Great Western) are feeling generous. Those of us who endured last December are praying there won't be a repeat of that shambles.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #44 on: October 24, 2008, 22:38:36 »

This Christian Wolmar piece argues that events could provide an opportunity to renationalise the railways (link below.)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/13/transport-railtravel

Wolverhampton South West MP (Member of Parliament) Rob Marris has challenged Geoff Hoon in the Commons to renationalise the railways (link below.)
http://www.birminghampost.net/news/west-midlands-transport-news/2008/10/23/wolverhampton-mp-calls-for-nationalisation-of-railways-65233-22100633/
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page