Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 03 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
3rd May (1954)
Lochluichart new station opens (link)

Train RunningCancelled
22:15 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
Short Run
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
18:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
20:37 Reading to Basingstoke
21:23 Basingstoke to Reading
22:05 Reading to Basingstoke
22:55 Basingstoke to Reading
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 03, 2025, 20:59:21 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[181] Subtle train time changes
[122] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[85] Bath Spa station - dealing with future capacity issues - ideas...
[59] A very easy riddle
[56] In memory of the Weymouth Harbour Tramway on the anniversary o...
[36] Service reduction - Coombe Junction
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Paddingitis hits TV  (Read 9841 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10459


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 02, 2008, 10:37:09 »

The other thing I can think of why there is extra padding being put into the time table is as a preamble to the Reading Station works and its associated signaling works and of course Crossrail works which will involve a lot of ontrack works Maidenhead to Padd with surveying leading up to it all of which may well result in TSR (Temporary Speed Restriction)'s (temporary speed limits) especially with the planned under GW» (Great Western - used as an abbreviation for the area / lines under the Great Western franchise, as opposed to FGW which includes "First", the company operating them too. For tickets - about) mainline underpass at Acton from the Mains to the yard, and there is the redevelopment of Hayes and airport junction.  So its either a precursor to that lot or just NR» (Network Rail - home page) and FGW (First Great Western) ensuring they meet ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) 92% target

To be honest, I think it's basically because of what I wrote about Paddington, in a post above...

It smacks of the service being specified with the actual pathing in and out of Paddington being considered as an afterthought.

Just substitute the word 'Paddington' with 'Reading'.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: December 02, 2008, 15:25:23 »

Maybe it would be better to go back to graphing trains.

I did an exercise on one of the previous timetables a couple of years back. What it showed graphically was the bunching at Ealing and the Greenford trying to get onto the Relief as the fast from Slough was crossing the junction.

Even the non cognoscenti  could see that if the first train of the sequence was delayed it would ripple back. Just like the  waves on the motorway.
 
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 02, 2008, 15:39:00 »

Just like the  waves on the motorway.
 

Gosh, I didn't realise global warming had got that bad yet.  Grin Grin
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 02, 2008, 17:42:50 »

The skills of graphing trains have probably been lost.

Nowadays, the computer does it quicker.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 07, 2008, 13:33:01 »

The reason for the average increased journey time of 3 minutes (off peak) is increased performance allowances and to improve "delivery"

Oxford - Pad turbos are also affected by changes to the Cross Country timetable.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 07, 2008, 14:08:13 »

The reason for the average increased journey time of 3 minutes (off peak) is increased performance allowances and to improve "delivery"

Oxford - Pad turbos are also affected by changes to the Cross Country timetable.

Are there any significant XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) changes apart from removal of all the Brighton extensions? That removes most of the hassle of XC trains crossing to the SR (Southern Railway / Southern Region / Scot Rail / Scottish Region (rather confusing - it depends on the context)) east of Reading, other than that, as far as I can tell, up and down XC services are running in the same paths they always did , within a minute...

Paul
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page