I have to be a little careful here as possibly know a little too much, the ECR areas are not being split ac dc not even North South a more radical structure is proposed even to the extent that one ECR can cover for the other in the event one is compromised
For something like an ECR, it would make sense to plan in
some redundancy.
It bothers me somewhat how much resistance is shown when it comes to modernisation plans for the railways. There are some magnificent examples of engineering and architecture out there which would be criminal to rip out just for the sake of it, but the railway network is a living thing, and needs to move with the times. Should a 21st Century railway network
have to rely on a man in a box pulling levers and ringing bells?
Things have to evolve and move on - I get the impression that there's too much of "tried that back in xxxx, and it didn't work" and "we've always done it this way" which is put in the way of progress. It may not have worked then, but things have moved on - the things that stopped it from working may be surmountable with modern tech, and just because things have always been done one way doesn't mean it's the right way. I mean, we don't use children to clean chimneys any more...