Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 02 May 2025
 
- Activists say ship aiming to sail to Gaza was attacked by drones
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
15:03 Oxford to London Paddington
15:34 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
15:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
Short Run
13:22 Swansea to London Paddington
14:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:20 Paignton to Exmouth
15:15 Swindon to Westbury
15:51 Paignton to Exmouth
16:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Evesham
Delayed
15:23 Exmouth to Paignton
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 16:23 Westbury to Chippenham
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 18:13 Chippenham to Westbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2025, 15:47:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[100] In memory of the Weymouth Harbour Tramway on the anniversary o...
[78] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[72] 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[53] Bath Spa station - dealing with future capacity issues - ideas...
[49] Low passenger numbers due to train unreliability
[43] Brighton Belle - merged topics
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Major job losses proposed for Network Rail signalling grades  (Read 5840 times)
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« on: July 22, 2011, 09:18:38 »

RAIL UNION RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) have confirmed that at yesterdays National Operations Council negotiating meeting Network Rail announced that under its long term operations strategy it intends to reduce dramatically the number of Signallers it currently employs.
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?action=post;board=36.0
RMT General Secretary Bob Crow said "We are not opposed to new technology but we are clear that any changes that may arise should be accommodated through a shorter working week, additional annual leave and the right to retire at 55 on full pension entitlement."
 Be cheaper to keep things as they are then! Tongue
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13351


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2011, 09:20:49 »

What's that link for? :-)
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4532


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2011, 17:27:36 »

As an engineer this look an interesting challenge and opportunity however the Signalers are not a happy bunch, the comments on the internal websystem relating to the plan, 14 Railway Control Centers (RCO) to be implemented this is over quite a few years decades even in some places.  Didcot and Cardiff at the 2 shown for the GW» (Great Western - used as an abbreviation for the area / lines under the Great Western franchise, as opposed to FGW which includes "First", the company operating them too. For tickets - about) route.  The move of Slough old and new to Didcot planned to be complete by the end of 2013 anyway

Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2011, 18:05:55 »

The closure of mechanical boxes cannot have come as much of a surprise to any new entrant signallers, but the changes announced are to take place over a 15-20 year period anyway, ie half a typical career.  There should be no obvious reason why the overall reduction in manpower shouldn't be manageable mostly by normal retirement over the sort of timescales becoming apparent.   

Paul
Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2011, 22:43:18 »

What's that link for? :-)
Oops sorry here is the correct link
http://www.rmt.org.uk/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=148213
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4532


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2011, 07:55:11 »

The closure of mechanical boxes cannot have come as much of a surprise to any new entrant signallers, but the changes announced are to take place over a 15-20 year period anyway, ie half a typical career.  There should be no obvious reason why the overall reduction in manpower shouldn't be manageable mostly by normal retirement over the sort of timescales becoming apparent.   

Paul
I agree although there are some raip changes in the pipe line like the reduction of Electrical Control Rooms (ECR) from the current 7 Southern, 2 WCML (West Coast Main Line), 1 ECML (East Coast Main Line), 1 Scotland, 1 East Anglia (total) 12 down to 2 which will be located in 2 of the ROC (Rail Operating Centre - a centralised location for railway signalling and train control operations for a specific route or region) 1 in South 1 in North. 

There is new OD (obstacle Detection) technology in the final phase being tested for level crossings and the new modular signaling systems being deployed all of which improves the business case to remove mechanical boxes up to now the business case has been weak due to the reliability of mechanical signaling.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2011, 11:42:28 »

A poster in the 'signalbox' forum gives the proposed dates of closures/transfers in the Wessex and Western areas, (sourced from the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers)'s private webpages), and also mentions Three Bridges and Manchester as being the locations of the two Electrical Control Rooms, presumably one for DC (Direct Current) and one for AC (Alternating Current, or can mean Air Conditioning, depending on context. The second meaning is often used in a railway context and more generally)?

http://www.signalbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3357&sid=ddee6f38f4e3999b9dc976f4867a6f8b

Paul
 
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4532


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2011, 12:53:56 »

and also mentions Three Bridges and Manchester as being the locations of the two Electrical Control Rooms, presumably one for DC (Direct Current) and one for AC (Alternating Current, or can mean Air Conditioning, depending on context. The second meaning is often used in a railway context and more generally)?
Paul

I have to be a little careful here as possibly know a little too much, the ECR areas are not being split ac dc not even North South a more radical structure is proposed even to the extent that one ECR can cover for the other in the event one is compromised
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
dviner
Full Member
***
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2011, 15:01:27 »

I have to be a little careful here as possibly know a little too much, the ECR areas are not being split ac dc not even North South a more radical structure is proposed even to the extent that one ECR can cover for the other in the event one is compromised

For something like an ECR, it would make sense to plan in some redundancy.

It bothers me somewhat how much resistance is shown when it comes to modernisation plans for the railways. There are some magnificent examples of engineering and architecture out there which would be criminal to rip out just for the sake of it, but the railway network is a living thing, and needs to move with the times. Should a 21st Century railway network have to rely on a man in a box pulling levers and ringing bells?

Things have to evolve and move on - I get the impression that there's too much of "tried that back in xxxx, and it didn't work" and "we've always done it this way" which is put in the way of progress. It may not have worked then, but things have moved on - the things that stopped it from working may be surmountable with modern tech, and just because things have always been done one way doesn't mean it's the right way. I mean, we don't use children to clean chimneys any more...
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4532


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2011, 18:18:45 »

we don't use children to clean chimneys any more...

Oooooo  Shocked didn't know that .......... better cancel the contract issued last week for chimney cleaning  Tongue Grin

You are right the railways are an ever evolving thing, problem is we have bits of kit that are expected to have a 20 to 30 year service life more often than not we get 50, 60 or more years life out of it, we do not live in a world now were we can rely on obsolete and obsolescent equipment or practices,  Jimmy Saville was 30 years ahead of his time ........... we are now in (que music and choir) "This is the age of the train" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sd3NRr4SYiA
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2011, 19:04:39 »

Jimmy at Bodmin Parkway Road.

No Trees to be seen, well not like today
« Last Edit: July 24, 2011, 19:22:24 by smokey » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page