Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 05:35 16 Jun 2025
 
- UK advises against all travel to Israel
- HS2 reports subcontractor over alleged fraud
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/06/25 - Rail Live 2025
21/06/25 - BRC to Lydney
24/06/25 - GWR Community Rail Conf
26/06/25 - TWNW conference

On this day
16th Jun (1947)
Last passenger train services to Nailsworth

Train RunningCancelled
06:28 Penzance to Plymouth
23:32 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
21:02 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
June 16, 2025, 05:43:31 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[136] Gone to the dogs? A look at greyhound racing's future - June 2...
[106] Where was Finn today, 15th June 2025.
[102] Looe Branch Line - timetables, cancellations, engineering work...
[69] Weymouth - Westbury cancellations, 14 and 15 June 2025
[38] Bus Service 205
[34] HS2 - Government proposals, alternative routes and general dis...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Friday 16th shambles  (Read 6755 times)
tramway
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 617



View Profile
« on: February 21, 2007, 00:14:56 »

Just a follow up to blogs/posts elsewhere.

http://oldfieldparktrains.blogspot.com/

I was also on the 1722 and it was diabolical. Although arriving in BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI) but BTM is a commonly used alternative)) about on time a single 158 was never going to cope on a Friday afternoon. FGW (First Great Western) should have been aware of what weekends are like, why on earth did Wessex hire the 31's to do the Brighton run for.  Huh Huh

Train should have left at 1722, it was announced that it wasn't going to be the first Bath train and anyone who could get through the doors should dash to platform 13. HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) duly departed before the 1722. It was full and crushed all the way to Trowbridge, where a female with young child with seat reservations were nearly denied access to the train. Her husband was busily writing complaint letters before the train finally pulled out, 20 min late.

« Last Edit: February 21, 2007, 00:24:29 by tramway » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 44248



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2007, 06:01:37 »

It is, of course, very expensive to have trains on the fleet that are only used for a small part of the day, and one of the big ways to reduce this expense is to reduce the peak.   It happened in the 1960s and 1970s with the reduction of seaside trains on summer saturdays, and First now appear to be doing it (and continuing to do it further in december if you look at the current edition of Rail) with the peak hour services into Bristol.

There is, though, a difference between what an annual tripper will put up with, and what a daily commuter will take.  I'm not a psychologist, but I note that the daily commuter is a stoic type who will, however, be a lot more of a "problem" once he gets rattled that an annual riviera tripper would.

There's evidence that the current tough commute conditions were intentionally engineered - or at least that warnings given by people who already know the service and flows very well weren't taken into account anything like as much as one would wish.   Remember the official view from certain senior civil servants who used to work for First  that a 30 minute stand is perfectly acceptable.

Now - to be fair to First - they seem to be looking (again?) at best use of trains in the critical peak times, inclding some "out of the box" options which weren't previously possible - using trains that were used on one of the three elements that came together to make up the new FGW (First Great Western) to support service that came from another element.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Jim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1186


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2007, 20:37:47 »

Did you hear what happened this Friday night on the 17:22?

It ran 4 car (unlike the 1622) but got split (a all seats taken 4 car 158) , taking the rear 158 off of it, the best bit was


wait for it

a)The crew weren't told
b)it was wedged


BUT


here it comes

The Split unit went to Pompey as a 4 car on what was the 1922 ex Bristol!
Logged

Cheers
Jim Smiley
AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
tramway
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 617



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2007, 15:57:26 »


I was also on the 1722 and it was diabolical. Although arriving in BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI) but BTM is a commonly used alternative)) about on time a single 158 was never going to cope on a Friday afternoon. FGW (First Great Western) should have been aware of what weekends are like, why on earth did Wessex hire the 31's to do the Brighton run for.  Huh Huh

I understood the additional diesel hauled service was rented 'by the hour' and was affordable for the times it ran as a suppliment on the Friday. There is still some info on the old Fragonset website, albeit the company has finally gone into administration.

http://www.fragonset.co.uk/archive.htm
Logged
Jim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1186


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2007, 16:23:10 »


I was also on the 1722 and it was diabolical. Although arriving in BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI) but BTM is a commonly used alternative)) about on time a single 158 was never going to cope on a Friday afternoon. FGW (First Great Western) should have been aware of what weekends are like, why on earth did Wessex hire the 31's to do the Brighton run for.  Huh Huh

I understood the additional diesel hauled service was rented 'by the hour' and was affordable for the times it ran as a suppliment on the Friday. There is still some info on the old Fragonset website, albeit the company has finally gone into administration.

http://www.fragonset.co.uk/archive.htm


Correct, it was indeed "Power By The Hour" which is what made it fairly good value
Logged

Cheers
Jim Smiley
AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page