Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:55 02 May 2025
 
- Activists say ship aiming to sail to Gaza was attacked by drones
- Trump disliked Trudeau - why Carney may fare better
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Wilton South station opened

Train RunningCancelled
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
17:35 Swindon to Westbury
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
Short Run
13:22 Swansea to London Paddington
14:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:52 Paignton to Exmouth
15:15 Swindon to Westbury
15:23 Exmouth to Paignton
15:55 Exmouth to Paignton
16:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Evesham
Delayed
15:51 Paignton to Exmouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 15:51 Exeter Central to Paignton
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 16:23 Westbury to Chippenham
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 18:13 Chippenham to Westbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2025, 16:08:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[100] In memory of the Weymouth Harbour Tramway on the anniversary o...
[78] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[72] 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[53] Bath Spa station - dealing with future capacity issues - ideas...
[49] Low passenger numbers due to train unreliability
[43] Brighton Belle - merged topics
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW Policy on release of CCTV to Insurance companies  (Read 6553 times)
thornebt
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 12


View Profile Email
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:39:55 »

A taxi reversed into my car by the taxi rank at Weston-Super-Mare station and denied he was liable saying I drove into him.  The area is covered by CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele-Vision) and my insurance company have submitted a written request (to FGW (First Great Western) Head Office I think) eight days ago for the CCTV footage to be downloaded and supplied to them.  In a recent phone call to my insurer they said that some companies have a policy of not releasing CCTV.  At the moment they are still waiting for a response to the request.

Does anybody know please if FGW have a policy on release of CCTV and how long it might generally take?  I'd also be interested to know what it would cost - although my insurer will cover this.

Thanks in advance.  Cheers.  Bruce.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13351


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2014, 09:20:27 »

Don't know for sure, but some TOCs (Train Operating Company) only release to a BTP (British Transport Police) request.
Logged
thornebt
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 12


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2014, 09:24:29 »

Thanks for your reply.  What are TOC (Train Operating Company) and BTP (British Transport Police) please?
Logged
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2014, 09:27:16 »

Train Operating Company and British Transport Police.
Logged
thornebt
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 12


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2014, 09:33:23 »

Thanks.  I'm optimistic that CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele-Vision) download will supplied as the station staff who were very helpful said that the procedure was for my insurer to submit a written request.  Sounds like it has been done before.  Fingers crossed.  It would just be nice to have confirmation that this shouldn't be a problem.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19588



View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2014, 09:54:48 »

Meanwhile, may I offer you a warm welcome to the Coffee Shop forum, thornebt.

Thanks for posting your enquiry, and please do let us know what happens - this could be useful for others in a similar situation.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
thornebt
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 12


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2014, 09:43:40 »

Thanks for the welcome Chris.  An update - My insurance company had no response from FGW (First Great Western) so they phoned the Head Office.  They found that they could obtain the CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele-Vision) footage by paying just a ^10 fee.  However, they advised me that it would take about a month to raise a cheque and obtain the CCTV (seems a ridiculous timeframe!) so I phoned FGW myself and will pay the ^10 over the phone when they ring back to say they have located the footage.

It is good news that FGW will release CCTV (by post on a DVD) and it only costs ^10.  Some companies will not release CCTV at all - due to the Data Protection Act I believe.  So if any forum members get their car bumped in the car park or whatever just phone FGW head office.  I guess it would help if you have some idea of time that the incident happened.  I am in the process of getting onboard cameras for my car.  Only costs about ^50 and it would have provided the necessary evidence if I had them when the incident happened!
Logged
Nibat
Full Member
***
Posts: 38


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2014, 18:14:02 »

I think I can explain the ridiculous timeframe.

If it's the same time of system installed in other ex-Wessex stations, the footage can only be downloaded by staff from Telent.  They have to do it locally at the station and even when they are connected directly to the network in the same cabinet it takes forever to do.  And that assuming it doesn't fail and they have to start again!  It helps a lot if the exact time and date can be given as that way they only have to download a couple-of-hour chunk, but I had in the past engineers with me from about 8 in the morning till maybe 5 in the afternoon to download a whole night footage.

And this is a system that was installed about 4 years ago!
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3571

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 01, 2014, 18:37:17 »

From the basis of the ^10 fee and requirement to request in writing it sounds like they are providing the CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele-Vision) footage through a Data Subject Access Request (DSAR). CCTV footage of you is covered by a DSAR request. This gives them a maximum of 40 days to provide the footage.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13351


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: November 01, 2014, 18:49:09 »

But this was of an inanimate object, not a person, and I don't think that's covered under DSAR?

Whatever, ^10 is damn good value. Pah! to your insurance company needing a month to raise a ^10 cheque though!
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3571

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2014, 18:52:55 »

But this was of an inanimate object, not a person, and I don't think that's covered under DSAR?

Whatever, ^10 is damn good value. Pah! to your insurance company needing a month to raise a ^10 cheque though!

Depends whether the car's owner features in the footage. I guess he will at least when he parked it and pulled away as a minimum as we don't have driverless cars as yet.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13351


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2014, 18:56:41 »

Butr that's not the footage requested....
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3571

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2014, 19:05:38 »

Butr that's not the footage requested....

But the footage requested will contain the required incident and if continuation of the footage the incident will also feature.
However it has not been clarified whether the OP (Original Poster / topic starter, or Off Peak, depending on context) was present at the time, if the taxi driver alleges he was moving forward at the time then its safe to say he was present in the footage at the time of the incident.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13351


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: November 01, 2014, 20:13:43 »

Fair comment....
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10242



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2014, 20:22:26 »

I just hope after all this that FGW (First Great Western) still have the footage and it has not been wiped so the storage can be reused....
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page