Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 02 May 2025
 
- Activists say ship aiming to sail to Gaza was attacked by drones
- Trump disliked Trudeau. Here's why Carney may fare better
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Wilton South station opened

Train RunningCancelled
16:57 Exmouth to Paignton
17:34 London Paddington to Hereford
18:50 Paignton to Exeter St Davids
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
Short Run
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
16:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
17:26 Exmouth to Paignton
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:56 Exmouth to Paignton
18:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
19:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
19:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:10 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
Delayed
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 18:13 Chippenham to Westbury
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 18:37 Westbury to Chippenham
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 19:14 Chippenham to Westbury
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 19:35 Westbury to Salisbury
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:16 Bristol Parkway to Bristol Temple Meads
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:52 Gloucester to Worcester Shrub Hill
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2025, 18:35:41 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[131] In memory of the Weymouth Harbour Tramway on the anniversary o...
[61] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[56] Taplow-Hassocks
[56] 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[41] Bath Spa station - dealing with future capacity issues - ideas...
[38] Low passenger numbers due to train unreliability
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: From a shuttle towards a service  (Read 2154 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43968



View Profile WWW Email
« on: November 08, 2014, 11:03:04 »

We're getting to have a proper train service on the TransWilts!

On Thursday evening, I left on a business trip on the 18:47 ... and when we were pulled into the platform at Chippenham, across the platform from us was the Southampton train, also via the TransWilts line.   This morning, on the 08:36 from Swindon,  a 2 car train coming up from Westbury pulled in to Chippenham just as we pulled out.

When we have a couple of trains around, are they busy enough?   Well - the 18:47 on Thursday dropped off 9 people and picked up 4 more at Melksham, and 10 people were left on the train to Chippenham.  That's 19/13 .  And this morning, the train left Chippenham a couple of minutes before 9 a.m. with 23 passengers on board; five got off and 3 got on at Melksham - for the stats, 26/8 .  Yes, that's a reasonable load for those particular trains ... especially when you consider that the main flow is morning toward Swindon and evening back, and the trains I have counter are contra-flow;  I would be almost certain that the trains we passed would have been much busier;  that's confirmed by a report (and yes, I saw it) of parking running out at Melksham station this morning.  And we're a pretty green station, with most people walking to / from ...

The more I observe, the more convinced I am that gap-fillers would not only work in terms of having traffic up to a good level, but ask that they would generate significant extra traffic with minimal abstraction from previous / next trains.  In particular, the Monday -> Friday southbound gap from 15:14 to 17:36 off Swindon could do with being plugged, as could the 07:48 to 10:03 morning gap (Melksham times given) up to Swindon.

We have a discussion ongoing at the moment in the TransWilts Member area of this forum about what could be done with the unit that form the 16:24 arrival and then the 17:54 departure at Swindon on the Stroud Valley line, and the unit that arrives in Westbury at 16:33 from Bristol Parkway and leaves at 17:11 for Warminster, passing back at 17:38 on its way back to Bristol Parkway.  Although we have some 130 minutes of idle "unit time", fuel levels, paths, staff rotas, robustness, where train can turn, where the freight and "Q" trains are, all have to be aligned to make anything operationally useful of it - a far from easy thing.   On its own / prior to the extra LSTF (Local Sustainable Transport Fund) services, this was looked at and put into the "very difficult, and insufficient to make enough of a service to be worthwhile" ... but now that the LSTF services are doing so well, perhaps it's more "very difficult, but worth doing".

In the morning, the 08:12 Bristol to Swindon sits in Swindon from 09:04 to 09:38, and in the past we have wondered about adding extra stops at Bradford-on-Avon (08:42) and Melksham (09:02 ish).  Although that's made easier by the addition of reversal facilities at Bradford Junction, such a service would now clash with the 08:48 (but please make it 08:36) Swindon to Westbury.  So with existing stock, that has moved from "difficult and insufficient" to "impossible but worth doing". Oh the irony!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page