Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:15 02 May 2025
 
- Activists say ship aiming to sail to Gaza was attacked by drones
- Trump disliked Trudeau. Here's why Carney may fare better
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
17:34 London Paddington to Hereford
18:26 Exmouth to Paignton
18:50 Paignton to Exeter St Davids
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
Short Run
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
17:26 Exmouth to Paignton
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:56 Exmouth to Paignton
18:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
19:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
19:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:10 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
20:28 Paignton to Exmouth
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
Delayed
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 18:37 Westbury to Chippenham
An additional bus service has been planned to operate as shown 19:14 Chippenham to Westbury
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 19:35 Westbury to Salisbury
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:16 Bristol Parkway to Bristol Temple Meads
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:52 Gloucester to Worcester Shrub Hill
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2025, 19:18:05 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[123] In memory of the Weymouth Harbour Tramway on the anniversary o...
[57] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[53] Taplow-Hassocks
[52] 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[38] Bath Spa station - dealing with future capacity issues - ideas...
[36] Low passenger numbers due to train unreliability
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Network Rail's electrification upgrade delayed, now restarted, by government  (Read 39208 times)
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8646



View Profile
« on: June 12, 2015, 11:20:22 »

http://www.expressandstar.com/business/city-news/2015/06/11/network-rail-debt-soars-to-38bn/

Performance "Isn't yet where we want it to be" has got to be the understatement of the year so far!

It's fortunate that the taxpayer is there to pick up the bill.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13351


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2015, 11:26:22 »

89+% isn't actually as poor as some TOCs (Train Operating Company)!!
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8646



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2015, 13:37:09 »

http://orr.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/18157/network-rail-monitor-2014-15-q3-4.pdf

Here's the report - makes pretty grim reading.
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1454


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2015, 12:33:43 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) News
Quote
The government says it will delay or cut back a number of modernisation projects planned for Network Rail.

Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin says rising costs and missed targets make the ^38.5bn plan untenable.

Network Rail's chief executive told the BBC that the plan, which was launched in April last year as the "largest modernisation of the railways since Victorian times", was too ambitious.

Mr McLoughlin also said Network Rail's chairman would leave the group. Richard Parry-Jones will leave after his three year term at Network Rail, which controls 2,500 stations as well as tracks, tunnels and level crossings. He will be replaced by Sir Peter Hendy, the current commissioner of Transport for London.

The projects at most risk of being delayed are the electrification of the Great Western Railway to Swansea, as well as the electrification of the Midland Mainline. The chief executive of Network Rail, Mark Carne, told the BBC the challenges of delivering myriad improvement projects - such as the electrification of the Great Western line to South Wales, improved punctuality for millions of passengers and the renewal of hundreds of miles of track - while still running a railway seven days a week were simply overwhelming.

"Over the last year, it has become obvious that the challenges of operating, maintaining and enhancing the railway are significant," he said. "I think it's time to level with the public and say that some of these extraordinary projects that we absolutely need are going to take longer and are going to cost more than we originally thought. "We are going to take the summer to re-evaluate the extension of the programme - we need to do that properly with the Department for Transport and, of course, looking at the impact on trains as well."

He said it would not be possible to estimate the impact of the delays on the final cost.
Mr Carne said it was important to be honest with the travelling public: "Rather than beating ourselves up over some rather arbitrary target, I think we should level with people and reset expectations around what we can deliver.
"Our railway is a great success story, passenger numbers have doubled in the last 20 years - but it's a huge challenge to transform the performance of our railway while still providing a great service to the four-and-a-half million people that use our railway every day."
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13351


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2015, 12:38:53 »

Good way to cut costs!delay the work into the next Control Period.... I thought that CP5 (Control Period 5 - the five year period between 2014 and 2019) would survive & CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024) get large cuts, but the lack of staff has been used to cut sooner
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6625


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2015, 12:47:04 »

Surely Dft have to place an order for more DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) stock. Transpennine Express trains are close to bursting at the seems with the planned electrification bringing in new rolling stock put on the back burner. That looks a long way off now.

Regards Swansea likely to get the chop wires wise, where does that leave the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) order, less 9 car electrics with 9 car bi-modes ordered?
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6625


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2015, 12:50:13 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) South Today's Transport correspondent Paul Clifton has just tweeted:

Electrification to Oxford is "vulnerable" say staff. Electric spine route "on pause."

Report on BBC South Today after the 1pm news.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6625


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2015, 12:59:13 »

Statement to the House of Commons by Transport Secretary:
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/network-rails-performance
Logged
Kernow Otter
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 273



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2015, 13:30:37 »

Government needs to be brave, and 'pause' HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) until the existing railway has been dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st Century.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13351


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2015, 13:36:38 »

won't happen....too much egg on face
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1454


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 25, 2015, 13:38:07 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) South Today's Transport correspondent Paul Clifton has just tweeted:

Electrification to Oxford is "vulnerable" say staff. Electric spine route "on pause."

Report on BBC South Today after the 1pm news.
Claimed additionally in the report that at the time electrification should have reached Swansea it might only have got as far as Swindon.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5680



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 25, 2015, 13:40:33 »

Surely Dft have to place an order for more DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) stock. Transpennine Express trains are close to bursting at the seems with the planned electrification bringing in new rolling stock put on the back burner. That looks a long way off now.

Regards Swansea likely to get the chop wires wise, where does that leave the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) order, less 9 car electrics with 9 car bi-modes ordered?

My natural cynicism leads me to suspect that the order for electric IEP sets will be reduced in either train length or number of trains, and that the diesel order will be increased, but by less than the reduction in electric sets.
For example order 20 fewer electric trains and 8 more diesel ones.

And announce that the HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) are to be life extended and re-deployed from the Electrified bit of the west to other areas where electrification is to be paused.
Then in a few years time announce that life extending the HSTs is not in fact viable, and that "some" overcrowding on DMUs will persist for a "few" years until electrification in the late 2020s, or perhaps a few years after that.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1454


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 25, 2015, 13:43:54 »

Speech given by Patrick McLoughlin here. (As above - hadn't refreshed.)

As well as the electric spine, MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) electrification seems to have been pushed out into future with concentration of available resources (people and money) on the GW» (Great Western - used as an abbreviation for the area / lines under the Great Western franchise, as opposed to FGW which includes "First", the company operating them too. For tickets - about).
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13351


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: June 25, 2015, 13:46:22 »

Statement to the House of Commons by Transport Secretary:
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/network-rails-performance

Same link....
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6625


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 25, 2015, 13:49:54 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) South Today's Transport correspondent Paul Clifton has just tweeted:

Electrification to Oxford is "vulnerable" say staff. Electric spine route "on pause."

Report on BBC South Today after the 1pm news.
Looks like the main focus is now on the main line to Bristol and Cardiff
Didcot to Oxford electrification is under threat
High Output Electrification Train described as 'a white elephant'


Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page