Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:55 03 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
3rd May (2018)
~ Just one working lower quadrant distant signal left (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:53 Basingstoke to Reading
14:00 Greenford to West Ealing
14:15 West Ealing to Greenford
14:30 Greenford to West Ealing
14:45 West Ealing to Greenford
15:00 Greenford to West Ealing
22:15 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:13 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
14:04 Newbury to London Paddington
14:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
15:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
13:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
14:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:37 Reading to Basingstoke
15:14 Gunnislake to Plymouth
15:24 Basingstoke to Reading
16:07 Reading to Basingstoke
16:53 Basingstoke to Reading
17:37 Reading to Basingstoke
18:23 Basingstoke to Reading
19:05 Reading to Basingstoke
19:55 Basingstoke to Reading
20:37 Reading to Basingstoke
21:23 Basingstoke to Reading
22:05 Reading to Basingstoke
22:55 Basingstoke to Reading
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 03, 2025, 14:12:52 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[192] Subtle train time changes
[91] A very easy riddle
[86] In memory of the Weymouth Harbour Tramway on the anniversary o...
[56] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[56] Service reduction - Coombe Junction
[15] Taplow-Hassocks
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Further bus changes in Wiltshire.  (Read 3833 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43974



View Profile WWW Email
« on: August 06, 2015, 16:25:34 »

The two early runs from Bath to Melksham on route 272 withdrawn and buses from Chippenham to Pewsham estate in Chippenham withdrawn from 23rd August.

From the Wiltshire Times ...

Quote
Melksham councillor let down by decision to cancel early bus ...

MELKSHAM Councillor Jon Hubbard said he feels ^disappointed and let down^ by the decision of First Bus to cancel their early morning buses running from Bowerhill.

According to Cllr Hubbard, the decision to stop the 6.48am and 7.41am 272 services will come as a bitter blow to residents who have already seen the free Melksham Rail Link bus axed last month.

The free rail link service, run by Frome Minibuses and funded through a Local Sustainable Transport Fund Grant, stopped on July 20 after Wiltshire Council was unable to secure funding to continue it.

Melksham also lost the 234 service at the beginning of this month after it was axed by First Group following a review of its services in Wiltshire, which resulted in the firm cutting a number of loss-making routes.

Cllr Hubbard said: ^I feel personally very let down by First Bus, who have made this decision. Last time I spoke with First it was about how these popular services could also help replace the Rail Link service. Now residents in Bowerhill are left with nothing.


Jon seems to have different news to I have - I understood it to be just the first Bath to Melksham buses (06:03 and 06:55) that were to cease, not the first two in both directions.

I haven't seen many people on the inbound buses (but need to take a further look);  I think their loss is probably far less serious than either the loss of the Rail Link or the evening 234 in terms of passenger numbers.   Jon's choice to defend strongly against the 272 cuts in a way we've not seen with the 234 or rail link is interesting, but I note that the 272 cuts are a First decision and the other cuts are a Wiltshire Council decision, and Jon is a Wiltshire Councillor ...

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43974



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2015, 16:29:03 »

Attachement - new 272 timetable (Monday to Friday) as supplied to me by First.

The early buses in the outbound direction from Bath now start at Melksham Market place, and many other services are 8 minutes later.   Nothing cancelled at all inbound to Bath, or later in the day.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43974



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2015, 20:00:14 »

Well ... the changes have happened and it was indeed just the first two buses from Bath which no longer run.

I observed these two buses arriving into Melksham Market Place a few times over recent weeks, and they were nearly or completely empty.  But just because a bus is empty at one point doesn't mean it' empty all the way (could have brought lots of folks to the Tyre factory) and I'll admit I didn't take a trip to learn for myself.

So I was very fortunate yesterday to get talking with a chap who used the 06:03 from Bath almost daily, and the 06:55 sometimes. He told me that he was usually the only passenger - sometimes joined by another person for part of the route.  And so, regrettably with that evidence and no marketing going on to encourage more people to use that bus, First's decision to cull it looks very understandable indeed.

What is disappointing is that no-one told the passengers  ...

What is baffling is that these are the services our councillor stood up for ... when he let the Melksham Rail Link and the evening 234 - carrying over 10 times the number of passengers - die.   Could in just be that a Wiltshire Councillor finds it more politically advantageous to make a point against First (who were the decision makers on the 272) than against Wiltshire Council (who were the decision makers on the rail link and 234!).
« Last Edit: August 26, 2015, 20:08:42 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19590



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2015, 02:45:05 »

What is baffling is that these are the services our councillor stood up for ... when he let the Melksham Rail Link and the evening 234 - carrying over 10 times the number of passengers - die.  Could it just be that a Wiltshire Councillor finds it more politically advantageous to make a point against First (who were the decision makers on the 272) than against Wiltshire Council (who were the decision makers on the rail link and 234!).

"You may very well think that: I couldn't possibly comment."  Tongue
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page