Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:15 01 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1851)
Great Exhibition opens (*)

Train RunningCancelled
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
20:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Delayed
18:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
20:29 Par to Newquay
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 21:16:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[144] Low passenger numbers due to train unreliability
[93] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[57] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[50] Cash payments for transport services
[48] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
[44] Proposed Bristol Airport link
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Rumour of HSTs to operate Cardiff-Portsmouth discounted - probably Class 165/166 instead  (Read 54474 times)
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6624


View Profile
« on: February 05, 2016, 19:13:32 »

The March edition of Today's Railways is reporting that "GWR (Great Western Railway) is considering using HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) on regional services such as Cardiff-Portsmouth". This is following the recent trial of running a 2+5 set in the SW. This would be in place of running turbos that are due to replace the current 158s that operate the route.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2016, 19:38:01 »

That would be consistent with the requirement in the franchise to look at more appropriate stock for that route.  And there will be lots of HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) spare, so it's certainly feasible in the not too distant future.

Would suggest power operated doors would be needed if dwell times are not to suffer, but Chiltern (and soon Scotrail) have these on Mk 3 stock so that shouldn't be an issue.

As well as solving the capacity problem on the route, I'm sure the improved rolling stock would in time make a big difference to passenger numbers.

Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2167



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2016, 19:57:40 »

Not forgetting the requirement for Short Swing Link bogies for Redbridge/Eastleigh to Portsmouth Smiley
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6624


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2016, 19:59:57 »

Would it be too much to hope that one of the five coaches would be one of the composite coaches bringing back First Class to the Cardiff-Portsmouth line?
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6624


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2016, 20:03:52 »

Even if nothing comes of this, I really don't see any HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) ending up at Booths of Rotherham (scrapers yard) for sometime to come. Hope the same can be said of the 18 class 442s about to come off lease.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2016, 00:17:30 »

A GWR (Great Western Railway) insider posting in the wnxx forum has written within the last week or so that this is definitely NOT happening on this route.

Also, HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) are not cleared to run on the Netley line, believed to be due to the power cars being out of gauge on the Hamble river bridge.

Paul
« Last Edit: February 06, 2016, 12:19:57 by paul7755 » Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13350


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2016, 22:23:50 »

So yet again the rail press don't check their facts.....
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43948



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2016, 22:29:50 »

As well as solving the capacity problem on the route, I'm sure the improved rolling stock would in time make a big difference to passenger numbers.

... resulting in a capacity issue once again?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2016, 22:42:34 »

As well as solving the capacity problem on the route, I'm sure the improved rolling stock would in time make a big difference to passenger numbers.

... resulting in a capacity issue once again?

Given the current sets are 3 car units, 5 coach sets should be OK for a while. Ideally the services should be limited in stops, with  the other stations served by shorter services (e.g. Westbury to Bristol, covering the Trowbridge and Bradford stops).  That would  also create more capacity on the HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units))'s and reduce journey times, making the services even more attractive for longer distance traffic.

Although from what paul7755 says, it isn't going to happen so maybe this discussion is academic. (Or maybe not, as the principle is the same even if the service is run by 5 car turbos.)

I probably just hanker after the service I used to take to get from Cardiff to Soton when at Uni... only 4 intermediate stops.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19586



View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2016, 22:52:35 »

So yet again the rail press don't check their facts.....

Instead, they could simply read the Coffee Shop forum.  Wink Cheesy Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13350


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2016, 00:37:14 »

quite.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6624


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2016, 06:09:01 »

So yet again the rail press don't check their facts.....
I am a little disappointed they didn't. If this story had been in certain other railway based magazines I wouldn't have bothered posting it. But as it was in Today's Railways, I thought better of them.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6624


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2016, 17:48:38 »

For what it's worth RAIL is also reporting the future use of shortened HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) on Cardiff-Penzance and Cardiff-Weymouth (think they mean Portsmouth) services.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13350


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2016, 17:51:23 »

So they nick it from Today's Railways & a) can't proof their own work & b) check out the story/source either....our railbpress really are sh1t
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 29, 2016, 12:23:07 »

Even if nothing comes of this, I really don't see any HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) ending up at Booths of Rotherham (scrapers yard) for sometime to come. Hope the same can be said of the 18 class 442s about to come off lease.

Surely a few loco-hauled 442s is the obvious answer. They will be available, provide the improvement in passenger quality that the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) asked GWR (Great Western Railway) to look at as part of its franchise terms, and I'm guessing have no issue with the Netley line.  The only problem is if they are regarded as a stop-gap then passenger expectations would need to be managed carefully as to the longer term quality of rolling stock they can expect.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page