Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:55 01 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1972)
Bristol Parkway station opens

Train RunningCancelled
15:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
16:28 Basingstoke to Reading
16:33 Reading to Basingstoke
16:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
16:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:59 Basingstoke to Reading
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:15 Reading to Basingstoke
17:20 Basingstoke to Reading
17:38 Reading to Basingstoke
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:53 Basingstoke to Reading
17:57 Reading to Basingstoke
18:17 Basingstoke to Reading
18:29 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
18:32 Reading to Basingstoke
18:37 Basingstoke to Reading
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:05 Reading to Basingstoke
19:07 Basingstoke to Reading
19:25 Reading to Basingstoke
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
15:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
18:10 Taunton to Cardiff Central
Delayed
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
15:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:18 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:22 Swansea to London Paddington
16:35 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
16:35 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 17:00:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[95] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[82] Cash payments for transport services
[79] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
[38] May Timetable Change
[38] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Rails for Reykjavik !  (Read 5213 times)
chuffed
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1562


View Profile
« on: May 21, 2016, 12:33:29 »

A line is to be bullt connecting Keflavik airport to the capital. The train station is planned to be below the bus station. One wonders whether the train will be geothermally powered !
Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1375



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2016, 12:39:45 »

Quite a large proportion of its energy requirements will be supplied by geothermal sources.

From wikipedia...

Quote
About 85 percent of total primary energy supply in Iceland is derived from domestically produced renewable energy sources.
In 2011, geothermal energy provided about 65 percent of primary energy, the share of hydropower was 20 percent, and the share of fossil fuels (mainly oil products for the transport sector) was 15 percent. In 2013, Iceland also became a producer of wind energy.

So natural nuclear energy from Mother Earth herself!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43947



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2016, 12:44:25 »

A line is to be bullt connecting Keflavik airport to the capital.

See http://icelandmonitor.mbl.is/news/nature_and_travel/2016/03/14/iceland_s_high_speed_airport_train_one_step_closer/

and ... YES PLEASE ... said as a heartfelt plea by someone who's used the current coach system and found it less than ideal before / after a longish flight.

Noting from the picture, mischievously, that perhaps DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about)'s foreign arm  Arriva - may be in the bidding to run it!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19310



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2016, 12:50:03 »

I believe a forum moderator was very recently in Iceland. Perhaps he'd care to comment. No idea whether this scheme is planned to be four tracks though...
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7429


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2016, 12:56:38 »

As described, it's more of a decision to think about planning to have another plan to actually build a railway. Maybe. 
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2016, 13:33:40 »

Hardly high speed as described in the report, but realistically the distance probably doesn't warrant anything faster.

I'd agree that the current coach journey is a bit tedious at around an hour.  Passenger numbers have grown rapidly in the last three years since low cost operators such as Easyjet opened routes. Though whether 6m a year is enough to sustain a frequent passenger service and justify the investment required to build the link must be marginal.

And although people tend to believe that the country has repaid those debts such as when Icesave collapsed, the reality is that the underlying debt position of the country is still very precarious, with a lot of bank bond debt now effectively backed by the government unlikely to be repaid (source FT).  So I am a little miffed that a busted flush thinks it can afford a nice to have railway when it can't pay its debts.

Logged
chuffed
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1562


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2016, 14:14:28 »

 According to the report in TR (Europe) the first 12km will be in tunnel the next 35km will be on the surface alongside motorway 41. ma x speed 175km/hr.  Forecast cost 150m ISK (1.07 million euros)
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4524


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2016, 14:16:32 »

According to the report in TR (Europe) the first 12km will be in tunnel the next 35km will be on the surface alongside motorway 41. ma x speed 175km/hr.  Forecast cost 150m ISK (1.07 million euros)

Seems very cheap for 47km of railway I would have though the million ought to be replaced with Billion
Logged
chuffed
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1562


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2016, 16:43:09 »

I stand corrected. Billion not million !
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2016, 09:17:44 »

Though whether 6m a year is enough to sustain a frequent passenger service and justify the investment required to build the link must be marginal.


Depends where it stops on the way.  Presumably it would pass through the Hafnarfjordur and Kopavogur suburbs on the way to Reykjavik.   They generate substantial commuter traffic into the capital.  I have no idea if they will have stops though. 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page