Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:15 01 May 2025
 
- Snake halts Japanese bullet trains after wrapping around power line
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1971)
Amtrak founded (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:57 Exmouth to Paignton
13:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
14:23 London Paddington to Oxford
14:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
14:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
15:03 Oxford to London Paddington
15:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
15:12 Westbury to Warminster
15:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport
15:25 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
15:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
15:30 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
15:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
15:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
15:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
15:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
16:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
16:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:32 Exeter Central to Okehampton
14:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
Delayed
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
14:06 London Paddington to Newbury
14:15 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
14:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
14:34 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
14:59 Marlow to Maidenhead
15:30 Banbury to Didcot Parkway
15:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
16:07 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
16:18 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:35 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
16:35 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 15:17:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[102] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[101] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[87] Cash payments for transport services
[84] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
[41] May Timetable Change
[40] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 170
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 688850 times)
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 517


View Profile
« Reply #330 on: January 19, 2018, 11:42:10 »

It's going to feature in the next series of the Paddington "fly-on-the-wall" documentary, apparently.
When I was at Reading a couple of weeks ago they were recording a Reading 'fly on the wall' documentary for Channel 5, so it could be used for that.
Logged
RobT
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 368


View Profile
« Reply #331 on: January 19, 2018, 12:06:06 »

From RTT» (Real Time Trains - website), unfortunately it was 12 late by Swindon!
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/C55335/2018/01/19/advanced
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #332 on: January 19, 2018, 12:19:29 »

Heard a rumour from fairly reliable source that one of the problems with the 5 car units is coupling two sets together.

Due to the streamlined nose the driver loses sight of the coupler on the set he's approaching so has to guided with hand signals.

The problem with auto couplers is they have to be given a fairly hard bang to couple but hard enough  to cause damage  or too soft not to couple properly.

Maybe they should fit a camara in the nose like a reversing camera on  cars with lines showing distance from the other unit.

Apparently that's why the 387s have the a white light on the right front level with the coupler to assist coupling.
Logged
RobT
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 368


View Profile
« Reply #333 on: January 19, 2018, 14:51:10 »

Heard a rumour from fairly reliable source that one of the problems with the 5 car units is coupling two sets together.

If that is correct then there would seem to be problems with both coupling and uncoupling, issues which Hitachi will surely need to resolve asap.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #334 on: January 19, 2018, 16:44:25 »


The problem with auto couplers is they have to be given a fairly hard bang to couple but hard enough  to cause damage  or too soft not to couple properly.


I assume that the speed of these trains is electronically controlled.  If the drivers can't judge that reliably, then can't there be a setting on the console that gets it right every time?   
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8643



View Profile
« Reply #335 on: January 19, 2018, 16:54:16 »

Heard a rumour from fairly reliable source that one of the problems with the 5 car units is coupling two sets together.

If that is correct then there would seem to be problems with both coupling and uncoupling, issues which Hitachi will surely need to resolve asap.

"Can the units couple together" Seems a pretty basic detail for GWR (Great Western Railway) to have ascertained during/after testing and before signoff acceptance into service?


Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #336 on: January 20, 2018, 14:45:35 »

Heard a rumour from fairly reliable source that one of the problems with the 5 car units is coupling two sets together.

Due to the streamlined nose the driver loses sight of the coupler on the set he's approaching so has to guided with hand signals.

The problem with auto couplers is they have to be given a fairly hard bang to couple but hard enough  to cause damage  or too soft not to couple properly.

Maybe they should fit a camara in the nose like a reversing camera on  cars with lines showing distance from the other unit.

Apparently that's why the 387s have the a white light on the right front level with the coupler to assist coupling.
The Dellner/Scharfenberg pattern coupler widely used in the older Electrostar and Desiro fleets (and on 387s and 800s) doesn’t normally require a ‘fairly hard bang’ to make it work.  The coupling action is hardly noticeable in the stationary portion.

I think the forward facing white light on more recent electrostar variants was reported to be for track illumination for the forward facing CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele-Vision).
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #337 on: January 21, 2018, 11:06:21 »

Basing my experience on the Chiltern Simulator coupling a 168! 
Logged
RobT
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 368


View Profile
« Reply #338 on: January 21, 2018, 11:25:59 »

Heard a rumour from fairly reliable source that one of the problems with the 5 car units is coupling two sets together.

Due to the streamlined nose the driver loses sight of the coupler on the set he's approaching so has to guided with hand signals.

The problem with auto couplers is they have to be given a fairly hard bang to couple but hard enough  to cause damage  or too soft not to couple properly.

Video of IETs (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) coupling at Swansea:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiitEoXTrbE&feature=youtu.be
Logged
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #339 on: January 21, 2018, 11:39:19 »

Basing my experience on the Chiltern Simulator coupling a 168! 
Pedant mode ON
These units use the BSI (British Standards Institute) coupler, not the Dellner/Scharfenberg design.
Pedant mode OFF
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #340 on: January 21, 2018, 15:21:34 »


Video of IETs (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) coupling at Swansea:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiitEoXTrbE&feature=youtu.be

Interesting guy signalling driver wasn't wearing Hi-Vis.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10456


View Profile
« Reply #341 on: January 21, 2018, 17:14:33 »

Looks like it was a fellow driver on the platform.  No need for hi-viz.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
mjones
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 408


View Profile
« Reply #342 on: January 23, 2018, 07:11:25 »

0659 from Didcot this morning, definitely still on diesel approaching Reading... Starting to feel like there are some persistent problems switching over.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4524


View Profile
« Reply #343 on: January 29, 2018, 17:29:33 »

Does anyone know whether the different Class 800 variants are considered to require separate traction knowledge?  I am thinking in particular of the version for the Plymouth and Penzance trains.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10456


View Profile
« Reply #344 on: January 29, 2018, 18:32:57 »

I don’t know for sure, but I would doubt it.  Unless the location of equipment and controls are radically different.  Small differences are to be expected but, like the 165/166 fleet, I don’t think there will be enough for them to be considered different.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 170
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page