Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 02 May 2025
 
- Trump disliked Trudeau. Here's why Carney may fare better
- Activists say ship aiming to sail to Gaza was attacked by drones
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
17:34 London Paddington to Hereford
18:26 Exmouth to Paignton
Short Run
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
19:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
19:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:10 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
20:28 Paignton to Exmouth
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
Delayed
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 19:35 Westbury to Salisbury
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
20:23 Swansea to London Paddington
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:16 Bristol Parkway to Bristol Temple Meads
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:52 Gloucester to Worcester Shrub Hill
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2025, 20:16:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[116] In memory of the Weymouth Harbour Tramway on the anniversary o...
[54] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[49] Taplow-Hassocks
[49] 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[36] Bath Spa station - dealing with future capacity issues - ideas...
[34] Low passenger numbers due to train unreliability
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Investigation into the DFT and the decision to cancel rail electrification.  (Read 3179 times)
Western Pathfinder
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1656



View Profile
« on: March 29, 2018, 13:40:04 »

Came across this released this morning
https://www.nao.org.uk/report/investigation-into-the-department-for-transports-decision-to-cancel-three-rail-electrification-projects/?platform=hootsuite.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7429


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2018, 14:18:54 »

It's worth noting that the report reaches no conclusion at all - it doesn't aim to, it's just documenting what happened. The most interesting paragraph (for readers here) is I think 4.6, about "Delivering benefits without electrification: Cardiff to Swansea":
Quote
4.6  The main passenger benefits of electrifying the Great Western route were to increase passenger capacity and to improve passenger experience. The Department had already ordered new bi-mode trains to run on the route before the decision to cancel. The train specification includes 24% more seats than the trains they replace. The Department expects to achieve the majority of journey time benefits through running the bi-mode trains in electric mode between London and Cardiff, where the trains can run at 125 miles per hour where line speed allows. The maximum speed a train (diesel or electric) can run between Cardiff and Swansea is 90 miles per hour so the full benefits of running fast electric trains would not have been possible even with electrification. Hitachi, the train manufacturer, estimates that electrification will reduce journey times between London and Swansea by 15 minutes once electrification to Cardiff is completed in 2019. The Department’s appraisal of the project in April 2017 assumed that journey times between Cardiff and Swansea will be 3.5 minutes longer with bi-mode trains operating in diesel rather than electric mode. However, at the Department’s request, the manufacturer has agreed to modify the bi-mode trains to enable them to operate at faster speeds in diesel mode. The Department currently expects that once electrification to Cardiff has been completed, the trains will be able to achieve the same journey times in diesel mode between Cardiff and Swansea as they would have in electric mode.
Logged
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1579



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2018, 16:51:54 »

The Audit Office might not have gone that far but they did leave some hints and this Tweet from Lilian Greenwood of the Transport Select Committee goes somewhat further

Grayling decided to cancel MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) electrification before the GE2017 but didn’t tell us; doesn’t know the environmental or financial costs; & promised same benefits from bi-mode trains - even though he knows they don’t exist. East Midlands passengers are entitled to feel very angry

It might be worth reading the 28 page NAO report as it is pretty damning.

Also today Bombardier announced that they have developed a 125mph biome based on their Adventra
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page