Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:35 15 Jun 2025
 
- UK sending more RAF jets to Middle East
- Seven people killed in India helicopter crash
* Man seriously hurt in airport car park incident
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/06/25 - Rail Live 2025
24/06/25 - GWR Community Rail Conf
26/06/25 - TWNW conference
05/07/25 - Railfuture AGM

On this day
15th Jun (2018)
GWR Community Rail conference at Swindon (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15/06/25 10:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15/06/25 10:50 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
11:32 Swindon to Weymouth
12:36 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
15/06/25 12:55 Bristol Parkway to London Paddington
15/06/25 13:12 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
13:49 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
15/06/25 13:51 Liskeard to Looe
13:55 Bristol Parkway to London Paddington
14:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
15/06/25 14:33 Looe to Liskeard
15/06/25 14:54 Paignton to London Paddington
15:12 Liskeard to Looe
15:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
15:41 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
15:44 Looe to Liskeard
15:45 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
16:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:25 Liskeard to Looe
15/06/25 16:27 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
17:04 Looe to Liskeard
17:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Parkway
17:33 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
17:44 Swindon to Salisbury
17:55 Liskeard to Looe
17:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:45 Looe to Liskeard
18:45 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
18:55 Bristol Temple Meads to Taunton
19:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Parkway
19:40 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
19:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:00 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
20:15 Liskeard to Looe
20:16 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
20:26 Exeter St Davids to Bristol Temple Meads
20:49 Looe to Liskeard
20:53 Bristol Temple Meads to Taunton
21:45 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
21:54 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
12:26 Gatwick Airport to Reading
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:14 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
13:32 Swindon to Weymouth
14:05 Frome to Swindon
14:26 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:05 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
16:43 Frome to Swindon
17:08 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
17:13 London Paddington to Swindon
18:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Portsmouth Harbour
18:50 Swindon to London Paddington
19:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
Delayed
11:03 London Paddington to Newquay
12:18 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
June 15, 2025, 13:52:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[139] Weymouth - Westbury cancellations, 14 and 15 June 2025
[88] Looe Branch Line - timetables, cancellations, engineering work...
[76] European Passengers Federation - 13th and 14th June 2025
[61] Bus Service 205
[41] Gone to the dogs? A look at greyhound racing's future - June 2...
[39] Storing petrol
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Marsh Barton Station  (Read 47631 times)
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 572



View Profile Email
« on: July 31, 2020, 18:41:31 »

New plans though I have not found the detail plans on the portal.

“The proposed station will have two platforms, with the eastern and western platforms served by trains to Newton Abbot and Exeter, respectively. Each platform will be 124 metres in length, sufficient to accommodate trains formed of up to 5 cars, and will be 4m wide.”
Each platform will have a waiting shelter, 10m wide by 1.5m deep, containing 12 stainless steel seats with arm rests, and a perch rail for 4 passengers, as well as one ticket vending machine on each platform, located inside the waiting shelters.

Marsh Barton Station. 2 by Robert, on Flickr

Marsh Barton Station by Robert, on Flickr
Logged
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2559


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2020, 22:38:23 »

From the local news:

https://www-devonlive-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/marsh-barton-train-station-plans-4384046.amp?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.devonlive.com%2Fnews%2Fdevon-news%2Fmarsh-barton-train-station-plans-4384046
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 44239



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2020, 22:54:39 »


That is a spectacular URL .... try https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/marsh-barton-train-station-plans-4384046 without the tracking data  Grin Grin

Was I reading a big cost saving by having the bridge ramps in line with the section aross the railway rather than at right angles it, parallel with the track ... the saving being in reduced payments because the problem of having to build close alongside the main and only railway to South Devon and Cornwall is largely eliminated.

https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/marsh-barton-train-station-plans-4384046
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 891


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2020, 10:37:16 »

Hopefully this will now proceed without further delay. The only quibble I have is allowing private motor vehicle access to the station site - given it's principal raison d'être it should be accessible only on foot, by bicycle or a frequent Marsh Barton Trading Estate shuttle bus service preferably using electric or hybrid vehicles.
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2020, 11:06:31 »

Hopefully this will now proceed without further delay. The only quibble I have is allowing private motor vehicle access to the station site - given it's principal raison d'être it should be accessible only on foot, by bicycle or a frequent Marsh Barton Trading Estate shuttle bus service preferably using electric or hybrid vehicles.

What's the betting this will up and running before either Portway Parkway or Portishead ?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 44239



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2020, 14:34:49 »

Hopefully this will now proceed without further delay. The only quibble I have is allowing private motor vehicle access to the station site - given it's principal raison d'être it should be accessible only on foot, by bicycle or a frequent Marsh Barton Trading Estate shuttle bus service preferably using electric or hybrid vehicles.

What's the betting this will up and running before either Portway Parkway or Portishead ?

You gave me an idea ... poll at http://www.passenger.chat/23856 . Just for fun.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 572



View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2020, 21:40:52 »

The annoying thing to me this is a Devon County Council (not Exeter where it is situated) proposal and can call on other funding that Torbay as a unitary authority cannot in regard to Edginswell.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4525


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 01, 2020, 22:23:46 »

The annoying thing to me this is a Devon County Council (not Exeter where it is situated) proposal and can call on other funding that Torbay as a unitary authority cannot in regard to Edginswell.

I don't understand the issue here. 

Exeter is not a unitary and therefore is part of the area covered by Devon County Council.  Torbay is a Unitary and is therefore not part of the area covered by Devon County Council.

Torbay Council as a unitary local authority has the same access to government funds as Devon County Council.  What is the issue?
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 572



View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: August 02, 2020, 14:32:41 »

The annoying thing to me this is a Devon County Council (not Exeter where it is situated) proposal and can call on other funding that Torbay as a unitary authority cannot in regard to Edginswell.

I don't understand the issue here. 

Exeter is not a unitary and therefore is part of the area covered by Devon County Council.  Torbay is a Unitary and is therefore not part of the area covered by Devon County Council.

Torbay Council as a unitary local authority has the same access to government funds as Devon County Council.  What is the issue?

This is what I was told on another site.

Devon County Council administrate transport infrastructure so the application will be applied by them rather than Exeter City Council. The same would have happened at Newcourt.

The scheme however is jointly funded by Devon County Council, Exeter City Council, Teignbridge District Council, East Devon District Council, and Mid Devon District Council. This is where being a unitary council is a handicap for Torbay (and Plymouth) as they can't call upon Devon County Council to give funding or request neighbouring council's under the Devon County Council umbrella to contribute to schemes.

And if that's right I am more annoyed because Torbay had to contribute a lot of money to the Kingskerswell By Pass which is wholly in Devon. Newton Abbot contributed a very small about and ensured there was only one lane in and out of Torbay while retaining all there access lanes at the roundabout.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4525


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 02, 2020, 19:39:14 »

Devon County Council administrate transport infrastructure so the application will be applied by them rather than Exeter City Council. The same would have happened at Newcourt.

The scheme however is jointly funded by Devon County Council, Exeter City Council, Teignbridge District Council, East Devon District Council, and Mid Devon District Council. This is where being a unitary council is a handicap for Torbay (and Plymouth) as they can't call upon Devon County Council to give funding or request neighbouring council's under the Devon County Council umbrella to contribute to schemes.

And if that's right I am more annoyed because Torbay had to contribute a lot of money to the Kingskerswell By Pass which is wholly in Devon. Newton Abbot contributed a very small about and ensured there was only one lane in and out of Torbay while retaining all there access lanes at the roundabout.

Yes but Kingkerswell By Pass benefited Torbay since it improved access to Torbay (massively by road at least).  And Torbay gets both County and District funding (such as it is) from central government. They could still agree co-funding with Devon on other things. 

I am guessing that Devon have agreed with their district councils for a funding package for Devon Metro as a whole. 

The same issue arises in other areas where councils want to go it alone (North Somerset?) rather than join in with their neighbours (in that case as a combined authority). 
Logged
southwest
Guest
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2020, 00:20:23 »

The annoying thing to me this is a Devon County Council (not Exeter where it is situated) proposal and can call on other funding that Torbay as a unitary authority cannot in regard to Edginswell.

I don't understand the issue here. 

Exeter is not a unitary and therefore is part of the area covered by Devon County Council.  Torbay is a Unitary and is therefore not part of the area covered by Devon County Council.

Torbay Council as a unitary local authority has the same access to government funds as Devon County Council.  What is the issue?

This is what I was told on another site.

Devon County Council administrate transport infrastructure so the application will be applied by them rather than Exeter City Council. The same would have happened at Newcourt.

The scheme however is jointly funded by Devon County Council, Exeter City Council, Teignbridge District Council, East Devon District Council, and Mid Devon District Council. This is where being a unitary council is a handicap for Torbay (and Plymouth) as they can't call upon Devon County Council to give funding or request neighbouring council's under the Devon County Council umbrella to contribute to schemes.

And if that's right I am more annoyed because Torbay had to contribute a lot of money to the Kingskerswell By Pass which is wholly in Devon. Newton Abbot contributed a very small about and ensured there was only one lane in and out of Torbay while retaining all there access lanes at the roundabout.

There is certainly more than one lane into and out of Torbay.   The only stupid idea was making the overpass at Penn Inn Roundabout one lane as often some don't follow the 50mph speed limit and drive up your backside!  Otherwise it works perfect fine, although it's very future proof limited (i.e not thinking much about its use in 10 or 20 years from now)
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 572



View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2020, 10:14:06 »

It was reduced to one lane from two or it would not have got built. It only got built because there was a coalition government at the time and Adrian Saunders was the Torbay MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) (libdem). The lanes at ground level were kept exactly as before so you can get to Torbay at ground level hindered by the traffic lights. Torbay was conned into paying a lot of money for one lane. Devon was looking after Newton Abbot.
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 572



View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: October 22, 2020, 20:54:50 »

Just checking past applications and Marsh Barton station validated on 27 July has still not been approved. More visualisations, in September on the planning portal with some alterations to original.

old

Marsh Barton Station by Robert, on Flickr

New

Marsh Barton sept 2020 by Robert, on Flickr
Logged
southwest
Guest
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2020, 21:36:14 »

Still the shelters won't be comfortable to sit in for your 30 minute wait, a Pagoda would be a better shelter  Grin. This station is very much needed and will provide good connections to those working in the area taking strain off Exeter's congested roads. I wonder if Stagecoach will set up a bus service from the station to further parts of Matford/Marsh Barton as parts are quite a distance from the proposed station.


One point to note: Whilst the idea is to get this station done on the cheap, would it not have been a good idea to have used this opportunity to make a second passing loop on the Newton Abbot to Exeter stretch?
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 572



View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2020, 11:05:34 »

https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/marsh-barton-new-train-station-4782036

Plans approved with a view to open in December 2021.

The article also mentions Okehampton, Edginswell, Monkerton, and Cullompton.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page