Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:35 01 May 2025
 
* Snake halts Japanese bullet trains after wrapping around power line
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1972)
Bristol Parkway station opens

Train RunningCancelled
11:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
12:13 Newbury to Reading
13:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
09:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:13 London Paddington to Newbury
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
Delayed
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 11:39:02 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[112] Cash payments for transport services
[69] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[53] May Timetable Change
[52] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
[36] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
[36] What and why - on the platform
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Highways England the best guardian for rail heritage and dormant resource?  (Read 19911 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43944



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #30 on: November 04, 2022, 11:21:01 »

From New Civil Engineer

Quote
National Highways scrutinised over four more historic bridge infills

National Highways is under pressure over four more controversial bridge infills which were carried out to historic structures before the infamous Great Musgrave fallout.

Campaigners claim that National Highways failed to obtain relevant planning consents for work on four historic bridges which were infilled using emergency powers between January 2019 and May 2021. National Highways disputes the claims and believes it does have the necessary consents for the infillings.

The HRE Group – an alliance of engineers, sustainable transport advocates and greenway developers – claims that the infillings have “questionable legal status” and is urging the four respective local authorities to assess whether National Highways should be ordered to reverse the work.

If the councils do issue enforcement orders for the infills to be removed, costs are likely to run into the millions.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43944



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #31 on: October 15, 2023, 21:12:49 »

From Lancs Live

Quote
'Vandalised' Cumbria railway bridge reopens two years after filled in with concrete

A Victorian railways bridge has finally reopened two years after National Highways filled it with concrete. The act was branded 'cultural vandalism'.

The Great Musgrave Bridge near Warcop was filled in by the highway agency in July 2021. The decision was made after fears the bridge could collapse.

Thousands of tons of concrete were poured into the 161-year-old bridge costing a whopping £124,000. But opponents said the work was taken "without justification" and the filling in would stop the bridge being used by walkers and cyclists.

This is just one of dozens of bridges that campaigners argue were infilled or demolished with no consideration taken about their heritage value. More than 800 people objected and Eden District Council issued an enforcement notice in September last year after refusing retrospective planning permission.

After listening to campaigners, work to remove the concrete started in July and the archway has been restored to was it once one. The bridge opened on Friday at 6pm.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2141


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: October 16, 2023, 07:10:40 »

and the total cost to the tax payer?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page