Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:15 01 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1928)
Inauguaral non stop "Flying Scotsman" London to Edinburgh (link)

Train RunningCancelled
10:24 Newbury to London Paddington
12:13 Newbury to Reading
Short Run
09:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:13 London Paddington to Newbury
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
Delayed
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 11:21:38 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[112] Cash payments for transport services
[69] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[53] May Timetable Change
[52] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
[36] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
[36] What and why - on the platform
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: GWR - Eight years old today  (Read 9412 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10456


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2024, 17:24:18 »

Yup, quite a few steps forward (which tend to get forgotten like late trains along the North Cotswold Line and a much improved service for Llanelli and Carmarthen), but quite a few steps backwards as well.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 881


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2024, 17:29:40 »

Although obviously not something for which GWR (Great Western Railway) bears much, if any, direct responsibility I rather think the failure to complete electrification to BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) - both possible routes - and SWA» (Swansea - next trains) should be on the -ve list. Perhaps the GWR powers-that-be could have argued the case more strongly?

On the +ve side the Devon Metro service has to get a mention even if the programme started in pre-GWR times. 
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1801



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2024, 17:58:59 »

Quote
Although obviously not something for which GWR (Great Western Railway) bears much, if any, direct responsibility I rather think the failure to complete electrification to BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains)» - both possible routes - and SWA» (Swansea - next trains)» should be on the -ve list. Perhaps the GWR powers-that-be could have argued the case more strongly?

Add Didcot to Oxford to that list! I imagine that the powers that be might read a representation from First Group/GWR and then ignore it in the light of the message from the Treasury via DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about).....
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 584


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: September 18, 2024, 13:00:54 »

Looking back on the original question posed by Graham

"What has been achieved under the GWR (Great Western Railway) branding, and what has failed?"

- can anyone provide a list of the achievements?

Echoing Grahame, I think the green GWR branding has worked very well to give everyone in the region something to be proud of. By and large, stations, rolling stock and personnel are very well turned out. Very much "our railway".

As for achievements, from a Bristolian perspective:
- Coping with, then taking advantage of electrification
- Coping reasonably well with COVID and strikes - felt like it had much less disruptive effect than elsewhere
- 80x introduction
- Stock refurbishments
- Okehampton reopening
- "Castles" and the introduction of an Intercity-quality service between Cardiff and Penzance
- Half-hourly Gloucester services
- Expansion of Severn Beach and Bristol local services
- Generally very good community relations and engagement
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 570



View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: September 20, 2024, 07:01:16 »

On the good side. Dawlish has lifts and rebuild of the seaward platform. Paignton station had new doors to street and platform.

Bad side. Torquay still waiting for lifts, Newton Abbot still waiting for new entrance to industrial estate. Edginswell still not built. Exeter St David's platform 2 extension abandoned which would have helped service flexibility. Exeter Central needs something done to help congestion on the narrow footbridge.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8643



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: September 20, 2024, 07:20:57 »

On the good side. Dawlish has lifts and rebuild of the seaward platform. Paignton station had new doors to street and platform.

Bad side. Torquay still waiting for lifts, Newton Abbot still waiting for new entrance to industrial estate. Edginswell still not built. Exeter St David's platform 2 extension abandoned which would have helped service flexibility. Exeter Central needs something done to help congestion on the narrow footbridge.

..................doesn't all that come under Network Rail's remit?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page